• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Close but Not Close Enough: How Distance Caregiving is Associated with Hospice Family Caregiver Hospice Communication Experiences.近在咫尺却又不够近:远程照护与临终关怀家庭照护者的临终关怀沟通体验之间的关联
Health Commun. 2024 Mar;39(3):482-492. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2170199. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
2
Family Members' Perceptions of Caregiver-Centered Communication with Hospice Interdisciplinary Teams: Relationship to Caregiver Wellbeing.家庭成员对临终关怀跨学科团队以照顾者为中心的沟通的看法:与照顾者幸福感的关系。
J Palliat Care. 2023 Jul;38(3):299-306. doi: 10.1177/08258597221113725. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
3
Anxiety, Depression, Quality of Life, Caregiver Burden, and Perceptions of Caregiver-Centered Communication among Black and White Hospice Family Caregivers.黑人和白人临终关怀家庭照顾者的焦虑、抑郁、生活质量、照顾者负担和以照顾者为中心的沟通感知。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;25(4):596-605. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0302. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
4
Family caregiving experiences with hospice lung cancer patients compared to other cancer types.与其他癌症类型相比,临终关怀肺癌患者的家庭护理体验。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2023;41(2):210-225. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2022.2101907. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
Impact of an automated, remote monitoring and coaching intervention in reducing hospice cancer family caregiving burden: A multisite randomized controlled trial.自动化远程监测和辅导干预对减轻临终关怀癌症家庭照护负担的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2024 Apr 1;130(7):1171-1182. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35131. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
6
Black Caregivers' Symptom Management, Cultural, and Religious Experiences With Home Hospice Care.黑人家属照顾者在家中临终关怀中的症状管理、文化和宗教体验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Aug;66(2):116-122.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
7
"It was terrible, I didn't sleep for two years": A mixed methods exploration of sleep and its effects among family caregivers of in-home hospice patients at end-of-life.“太可怕了,我两年都没睡过觉了”:一项混合方法研究,探索临终家庭护工的睡眠及其影响。
Palliat Med. 2022 Dec;36(10):1504-1521. doi: 10.1177/02692163221122956. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
8
Hospice Family Caregivers' Uncertainty, Burden, and Unmet Needs in Prospective Audio Diaries.前瞻性音频日记中临终关怀家庭护理者的不确定性、负担和未满足的需求。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2023 Dec 1;25(6):321-329. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000975. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
9
Association of Hospice Profit Status With Family Caregivers' Reported Care Experiences.临终关怀机构盈利状况与家属报告的照护体验的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Apr 1;183(4):311-318. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7076.
10
The Burden of having to Wonder: Hospice Caregiving Experiences of LGBTQ+ Cancer Family Caregivers.疑惑的负担:LGBTQ+癌症家庭照顾者的临终关怀照顾经历
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Jan;41(1):56-62. doi: 10.1177/10499091231159089. Epub 2023 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences and support needs of informal long-distance caregivers at the end of life: a scoping review.临终非专业远距离照护者的体验和支持需求:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 21;13(4):e068175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068175.

本文引用的文献

1
Family caregiving experiences with hospice lung cancer patients compared to other cancer types.与其他癌症类型相比,临终关怀肺癌患者的家庭护理体验。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2023;41(2):210-225. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2022.2101907. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
Family Members' Perceptions of Caregiver-Centered Communication with Hospice Interdisciplinary Teams: Relationship to Caregiver Wellbeing.家庭成员对临终关怀跨学科团队以照顾者为中心的沟通的看法:与照顾者幸福感的关系。
J Palliat Care. 2023 Jul;38(3):299-306. doi: 10.1177/08258597221113725. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
3
Reliability and Validity Testing of the Caregiver-Centered Communication Questionnaire. caregiver-centered communication questionnaire 的信度和效度测试
J Nurs Meas. 2023 Sep 1;31(3):439-447. doi: 10.1891/JNM-2022-0044. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
4
Insomnia Symptoms Among Hospice Family Caregivers: Prevalence and Association with Caregiver Mental and Physical Health, Quality of Life, and Caregiver Burden.临终关怀家庭照护者的失眠症状:流行率及与照护者心理和身体健康、生活质量和照护者负担的关系。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 May;40(5):517-528. doi: 10.1177/10499091221105882. Epub 2022 May 26.
5
Long-distance caregiving at the end of life: a protocol for an exploratory qualitative study in Germany.生命终末期的远程照护:在德国开展探索性定性研究的方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 May 12;21(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00967-8.
6
Choosing and Managing Aged Care Services from Afar: What Matters to Australian Long-Distance Care Givers.远程选择和管理老年护理服务:澳大利亚远程护理者关心的问题。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 9;18(24):13000. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413000.
7
Timely Communication Through Telehealth: Added Value for a Caregiver During COVID-19.远程医疗实现及时沟通:COVID-19 期间护理人员的附加价值。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 29;9:755391. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.755391. eCollection 2021.
8
Perceptions of Telehealth vs In-Person Visits Among Older Adults With Advanced Kidney Disease, Care Partners, and Clinicians.老年晚期肾病患者、照护者和临床医生对远程医疗与面对面就诊的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2137193. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37193.
9
Anxiety, Depression, Quality of Life, Caregiver Burden, and Perceptions of Caregiver-Centered Communication among Black and White Hospice Family Caregivers.黑人和白人临终关怀家庭照顾者的焦虑、抑郁、生活质量、照顾者负担和以照顾者为中心的沟通感知。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;25(4):596-605. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0302. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
10
A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward.一项基于文献的关于护患互动中以患者为中心的护理与沟通的研究:障碍、促进因素及未来方向。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Sep 3;20(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2.

近在咫尺却又不够近:远程照护与临终关怀家庭照护者的临终关怀沟通体验之间的关联

Close but Not Close Enough: How Distance Caregiving is Associated with Hospice Family Caregiver Hospice Communication Experiences.

作者信息

Starr Lauren T, Washington Karla, Pitzer Kyle, Oliver Debra Parker, Demiris George

机构信息

Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing.

Division of Palliative Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2024 Mar;39(3):482-492. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2170199. Epub 2023 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1080/10410236.2023.2170199
PMID:36683376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10362092/
Abstract

Half of hospice family caregivers report having unmet information needs, which can contribute to poor pain and symptom management, emergency department use, and hospice disenrollment for care-recipients and to caregiver strain and stress. Effective communication between hospice teams and family caregivers is critical yet communication inadequacies persist. Despite the growing prevalence of distance caregiving, including in hospice care, and the relationship between caregiver proximity and communication effectiveness, little is known about how caregiver proximity is associated with caregiver perceptions of hospice communication. In this secondary analysis of quantitative data from two multisite randomized clinical trials (NCT03712410 and NCT02929108) for hospice family caregivers ( = 525), multivariate linear models with demographic and contextual controls were used to analyze caregivers' perceptions of caregiver-centered communication with hospice providers based on caregiver proximity to the hospice care-recipient. In multivariate models, "local" hospice family caregivers who lived within 1 hour of the hospice care-recipient reported less effective communication with the hospice team than co-residing caregivers; and older caregivers rated communication more favorably than younger caregivers. To improve communication and collaboration between hospice teams and caregivers, regardless of proximity, distance communication training for hospice teams and interventions such as telehealth communication and virtual tools that enable triadic collaboration are recommended. Research is needed to understand why local caregivers, specifically, perceive communication quality less favorably and how hospice teams can better meet local and distance caregiver communication needs.

摘要

半数临终关怀机构的家庭照护者表示他们的信息需求未得到满足,这可能导致照护对象的疼痛和症状管理不善、频繁前往急诊科就医以及退出临终关怀护理,同时也会给照护者带来压力和负担。临终关怀团队与家庭照护者之间的有效沟通至关重要,但沟通不足的问题依然存在。尽管远程照护的普及率在不断提高,包括在临终关怀护理中,且照护者与照护对象的距离和沟通效果之间存在关联,但对于照护者与临终关怀机构沟通的认知如何受到照护者与照护对象距离的影响,我们知之甚少。在这项对两项多中心随机临床试验(NCT03712410和NCT02929108)中针对临终关怀家庭照护者(n = 525)的定量数据进行的二次分析中,我们使用了包含人口统计学和背景控制变量的多元线性模型,来分析基于照护者与临终关怀照护对象的距离,照护者对以照护者为中心与临终关怀机构提供者沟通的认知情况。在多变量模型中,居住在距离临终关怀照护对象1小时路程内的“本地”临终关怀家庭照护者报告称,他们与临终关怀团队的沟通效果不如同住的照护者;年龄较大的照护者对沟通的评价比年轻照护者更积极。为了改善临终关怀团队与照护者之间的沟通与协作,无论距离远近,建议为临终关怀团队提供远程沟通培训,并采取远程医疗沟通和虚拟工具等干预措施,以实现三方协作。有必要开展研究,以了解为何本地照护者对沟通质量的评价较低,以及临终关怀团队如何更好地满足本地和远程照护者的沟通需求。