• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助经皮螺钉固定治疗舟骨骨折

Robot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation in the treatment of navicular fracture.

作者信息

Wang Cheng, Fu Shaoling, Li Xueqian, Wang Jiazheng, Wu Chenglin, Zhang Jieyuan, Song Guoxun, Gu Wenqi, Shi Zhongmin

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Jan 5;9:1049455. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1049455. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.1049455
PMID:36684335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9849596/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long recovery time, large scar, postoperative swelling and pain are possible side effects of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for tarsal navicular fractures. Early exercise instruction is made possible by the use of an intraoperative robot-assisted percutaneous invasive closed reduction internal fixation. The goal of the trial was to determine whether percutaneous screw internal fixation with robot assistance might be used to treat navicular fractures.

METHODS

27 patients with navicular fractures had surgical treatment between June 2019 and December 2021. Of those, 20 instances were treated with ORIF, while 7 cases had robot-assisted percutaneous screw internal fixation. At the final follow-up, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score were compared to determine outcomes and function.

RESULTS

Follow-up was obtained in all 27 patients after surgery, with a mean follow-up time of 21.81 months, ranging from 15 to 29 months . In the 7 instances of robot-assisted group, percutaneous guide wire insertion and screw placement only needed one attempt and the depth and position of the implant were both satisfactory. In the ORIF group, there were two patients who sustained cutaneous nerve injuries. The AOFAS score and the VAS score of the group receiving robot-assisted navigation percutaneous screw fixation were 92.25 ± 2.22 and 0.75 ± 0.25 respectively at the last follow-up, while 82.25 ± 7.15 and 0.50 ± 0.29 were the respective values for the ORIF group.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative robot-assisted percutaneous closed reduction internal fixation for tarsal navicular fractures can accomplish exact localization of fracture site, reduce soft tissue damage and operative time. According to current view, this method offers fewer complications, a faster recovery after surgery, and more patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景

跗舟骨骨折切开复位内固定术(ORIF)可能存在恢复时间长、瘢痕大、术后肿胀和疼痛等副作用。术中使用机器人辅助经皮侵入性闭合复位内固定术使得早期运动指导成为可能。该试验的目的是确定机器人辅助下经皮螺钉内固定术是否可用于治疗舟骨骨折。

方法

2019年6月至2021年12月期间,27例舟骨骨折患者接受了手术治疗。其中,20例采用ORIF治疗,7例采用机器人辅助经皮螺钉内固定术。在末次随访时,比较美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)后足评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,以确定治疗效果和功能。

结果

所有27例患者术后均获得随访,平均随访时间为21.81个月,范围为15至29个月。在机器人辅助组的7例患者中,经皮导丝插入和螺钉置入仅需一次尝试,植入物的深度和位置均令人满意。在ORIF组中,有2例患者发生皮神经损伤。末次随访时,接受机器人辅助导航经皮螺钉固定组的AOFAS评分和VAS评分分别为92.25±2.22和0.75±0.25,而ORIF组的相应值分别为82.25±7.15和0.50±0.29。

结论

术中机器人辅助经皮闭合复位内固定术治疗跗舟骨骨折可实现骨折部位的精确定位,减少软组织损伤和手术时间。根据目前的观点,该方法并发症较少,术后恢复较快,患者满意度较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/844779102577/fsurg-09-1049455-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/b1ee127ae638/fsurg-09-1049455-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/8c4cf1eb8e5c/fsurg-09-1049455-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/394b3e240fcc/fsurg-09-1049455-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/0aa590ee07d6/fsurg-09-1049455-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/5e49e93b0f09/fsurg-09-1049455-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/df8e4793d477/fsurg-09-1049455-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/844779102577/fsurg-09-1049455-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/b1ee127ae638/fsurg-09-1049455-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/8c4cf1eb8e5c/fsurg-09-1049455-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/394b3e240fcc/fsurg-09-1049455-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/0aa590ee07d6/fsurg-09-1049455-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/5e49e93b0f09/fsurg-09-1049455-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/df8e4793d477/fsurg-09-1049455-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0e7/9849596/844779102577/fsurg-09-1049455-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Robot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation in the treatment of navicular fracture.机器人辅助经皮螺钉固定治疗舟骨骨折
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 5;9:1049455. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1049455. eCollection 2022.
2
Does robot-assisted percutaneous hollow screw placement combined with tarsal sinus incision reduction in the treatment of calcaneal fracture perform better at a minimum two year follow-up compared with traditional surgical reduction and fixation?机器人辅助经皮空心螺钉置入联合跗骨窦切口复位治疗跟骨骨折与传统手术复位内固定相比,在至少 2 年的随访中效果更好吗?
Int Orthop. 2023 Jun;47(6):1575-1581. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05752-7. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
3
Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures with Cannulated Screw Invasive Internal Fixation Assisted by Orthopaedic Surgery Robot Positioning System.骨科手术机器人定位系统辅助空心螺钉微创内固定治疗股骨颈骨折。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Oct;11(5):864-872. doi: 10.1111/os.12548.
4
[A comparative study on internal fixation of calcaneal fractures assisted by robot and traditional open reduction internal fixation].机器人辅助与传统切开复位内固定治疗跟骨骨折的对比研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 15;35(6):729-733. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202101029.
5
Percutaneous robot-assisted screw fixation for nondisplaced pelvic fractures: a good choice?经皮机器人辅助螺钉固定治疗无移位骨盆骨折:一个好的选择?
Int Orthop. 2023 Jun;47(6):1601-1608. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05794-x. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
6
Robot-assisted Minimally-invasive Internal Fixation of Pelvic Ring Injuries: A Single-center Experience.机器人辅助微创骨盆环损伤内固定术:单中心经验
Orthop Surg. 2019 Feb;11(1):42-51. doi: 10.1111/os.12423. Epub 2019 Feb 3.
7
[Comparison of effectiveness between plate and screw internal fixation in treatment of posterior malleolus fractures through posterolateral approach].经后外侧入路钢板与螺钉内固定治疗后踝骨折的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 15;35(4):431-438. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202010030.
8
Calcaneus traction compression with orthopaedic reduction forceps combined with percutaneous minimally invasive treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures: An analysis of efficacy.跟骨牵引压缩配合骨科复位钳联合经皮微创治疗关节内跟骨骨折:疗效分析。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2020 Aug;128:110295. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110295. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
9
[Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis with thoracolumbar fractures by robot-assisted internal fixation in lateral decubitus position].[机器人辅助侧卧位内固定治疗强直性脊柱炎合并胸腰椎骨折]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2022 Feb 25;35(2):113-7. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.02.004.
10
[Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and minimally invasive decompression in the same incision for type A3 thoracolumbar burst fracture].经皮椎弓根螺钉固定与微创减压同一切口治疗 A3 型胸腰椎爆裂骨折
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jul 15;31(7):830-836. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201702089.

引用本文的文献

1
Morphological measurements and classification of the navicular bone: a study based on computed tomography imaging.足舟骨的形态学测量和分类:基于计算机断层成像的研究。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2024 Jul;46(7):1131-1136. doi: 10.1007/s00276-024-03378-x. Epub 2024 May 8.
2
Robotic-assisted foot and ankle surgery: a review of the present status and the future.机器人辅助足踝手术:现状与未来综述
Biomed Eng Lett. 2023 Oct 11;13(4):571-577. doi: 10.1007/s13534-023-00328-1. eCollection 2023 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and risk factors of TINAVI robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery.TINAVI 机器人辅助经皮椎弓根螺钉置入术在脊柱手术中的安全性及风险因素。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Aug 8;17(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03271-6.
2
Navicular Fracture.舟骨骨折
Foot Ankle Clin. 2022 Jun;27(2):457-474. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2021.11.024. Epub 2022 May 5.
3
The Use of Low-Profile Angular-Stability Plates in a "Nutcracker" Tarsal Navicular Fracture Combined with a Cuboid Fracture: ORIF Experience.低轮廓角稳定钢板在“胡桃夹”型舟骨骨折合并骰骨骨折中的应用:切开复位内固定经验
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2021 Dec 6;6(4):99. doi: 10.3390/jfmk6040099.
4
Return to sport following navicular stress fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of three hundred and fifteen fractures.足舟骨应力性骨折后重返运动:315 例骨折的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2021 Oct;45(10):2699-2710. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05147-6. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
5
Radiological and Clinical Differences between Tinavi Orthopedic Robot and O-Arm Navigation System in Thoracolumbar Screw Implantation for Reconstruction of Spinal Stability.经胸腰椎螺钉置入重建脊柱稳定性中,Tinavi 骨科机器人与 O 臂导航系统的放射学和临床差异。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Sep 12;26:e924770. doi: 10.12659/MSM.924770.
6
Population-based incidence and epidemiology of 5912 foot fractures.基于人群的 5912 例足部骨折的发病率和流行病学研究。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Feb;27(2):181-185. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 May 19.
7
Tarsal Navicular Fracture in a Parkour Practitioner, a Rare Injury - Case Report and Literature Review.一名跑酷练习者的跗舟骨骨折,一种罕见损伤——病例报告及文献综述
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 Dec;54(6):739-745. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.12.009. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
8
A review of the management and outcomes of tarsal navicular fracture.距骨舟状骨骨折的治疗与结局的回顾。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Jul;26(5):480-486. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2019.05.020. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
9
Acute Fractures of the Tarsal Navicular: A Critical Analysis Review.舟骨急性骨折:一项批判性分析综述
JBJS Rev. 2015 Mar 31;3(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.N.00055.
10
Fractures and Dislocations of the Tarsal Navicular.足舟骨骨折与脱位
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Jun;24(6):379-89. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00442.