Bickart Kevin C, Olsen Alexander, Dennis Emily L, Babikian Talin, Hoffman Ann N, Snyder Aliyah, Sheridan Christopher A, Fischer Jesse T, Giza Christopher C, Choe Meeryo C, Asarnow Robert F
BrainSPORT, Department of Neurosurgery, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Department of Neurology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Jan 4;3:1064215. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.1064215. eCollection 2022.
In survivors of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI), affective disruptions often remain underdetected and undertreated, in part due to poor understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms. We hypothesized that limbic circuits are integral to affective dysregulation in msTBI. To test this, we studied 19 adolescents with msTBI 17 months post-injury (TBI: M age 15.6, 5 females) as well as 44 matched healthy controls (HC: M age 16.4, 21 females). We leveraged two previously identified, large-scale resting-state (rsfMRI) networks of the amygdala to determine whether connectivity strength correlated with affective problems in the adolescents with msTBI. We found that distinct amygdala networks differentially predicted externalizing and internalizing behavioral problems in patients with msTBI. Specifically, patients with the highest medial amygdala connectivity were rated by parents as having greater externalizing behavioral problems measured on the BRIEF and CBCL, but not cognitive problems. The most correlated voxels in that network localize to the rostral anterior cingulate (rACC) and posterior cingulate (PCC) cortices, predicting 48% of the variance in externalizing problems. Alternatively, patients with the highest ventrolateral amygdala connectivity were rated by parents as having greater internalizing behavioral problems measured on the CBCL, but not cognitive problems. The most correlated voxels in that network localize to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), predicting 57% of the variance in internalizing problems. Both findings were independent of potential confounds including ratings of TBI severity, time since injury, lesion burden based on acute imaging, demographic variables, and other non-amygdalar rsfMRI metrics (e.g., rACC to PCC connectivity), as well as macro- and microstructural measures of limbic circuitry (e.g., amygdala volume and uncinate fasciculus fractional anisotropy). Supporting the clinical significance of these findings, patients with msTBI had significantly greater externalizing problem ratings than healthy control participants and all the brain-behavior findings were specific to the msTBI group in that no similar correlations were found in the healthy control participants. Taken together, frontoamygdala pathways may underlie chronic dysregulation of behavior and mood in patients with msTBI. Future work will focus on neuromodulation techniques to directly affect frontoamygdala pathways with the aim to mitigate such dysregulation problems.
在中度至重度创伤性脑损伤(msTBI)幸存者中,情感障碍常常未被充分检测和治疗,部分原因是对潜在神经机制的理解不足。我们假设边缘回路在msTBI的情感失调中起着不可或缺的作用。为了验证这一点,我们研究了19名受伤17个月后的msTBI青少年(TBI组:平均年龄15.6岁,5名女性)以及44名匹配的健康对照者(HC组:平均年龄16.4岁,21名女性)。我们利用先前确定的两个杏仁核大规模静息态功能磁共振成像(rsfMRI)网络,来确定连接强度是否与msTBI青少年的情感问题相关。我们发现,不同的杏仁核网络对msTBI患者的外化和内化行为问题有不同的预测作用。具体而言,杏仁核内侧连接性最高的患者,其父母评定他们在《行为评估问卷》(BRIEF)和《儿童行为清单》(CBCL)上的外化行为问题更严重,但认知问题不严重。该网络中相关性最强的体素定位于喙前扣带回(rACC)和后扣带回(PCC)皮质,可预测外化问题中48%的方差。另外,杏仁核腹外侧连接性最高的患者,其父母评定他们在CBCL上的内化行为问题更严重,但认知问题不严重。该网络中相关性最强的体素定位于腹内侧前额叶皮质(vmPFC),可预测内化问题中57%的方差。这两个发现均独立于潜在的混杂因素,包括TBI严重程度评分、受伤后的时间、基于急性成像的病灶负担、人口统计学变量以及其他非杏仁核rsfMRI指标(例如rACC与PCC的连接性),以及边缘回路的宏观和微观结构测量指标(例如杏仁核体积和钩束各向异性分数)。这些发现的临床意义在于,msTBI患者的外化问题评分显著高于健康对照参与者,并且所有脑-行为关系的发现均特定于msTBI组,因为在健康对照参与者中未发现类似的相关性。综上所述,额-杏仁核通路可能是msTBI患者行为和情绪长期失调的基础。未来的工作将集中在神经调节技术上,以直接影响额-杏仁核通路,从而减轻此类失调问题。