Barisch-Fritz Bettina, Nigg Claudio R, Barisch Marc, Woll Alexander
Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Institute of Sports Science, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Jan 4;4:1012239. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1012239. eCollection 2022.
The digital health sector is rapidly growing. With only 4% of publishers out of academic settings, it is under-represented in app development. The objective of this study is to assess the current state of app development with a systematic review and a survey within an exemplary academic setting along the following research questions: (Q1) Are software engineering principles sufficiently known in the sports science app development context? (Q2) Is the role of sports scientists in the context of app development sufficiently understood? The systematic review was conducted by two independent reviewers within databases Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. The PICO schema was used to identify the search term. We subtracted information about five main topics: development process, functional requirements and features, security, technology, and dissemination. The survey was developed by a multidisciplinary team and focused on five main topics. Out of 701 matches, 21 were included in the review. The development process was only described in seven studies. Functional requirements and features were considered in 11 studies, security in 3, technology in 13, and dissemination in 12 with varying details. Twelve respondents [mean age 33(7) years, 58% women] replied to the survey. The survey revealed limited knowledge in realization of security measures, underlying technology and source code management, and dissemination. Respondents were able to provide input on development processes as well as functional requirements and features. The involvement of domain experts is given in seven review studies and described in two more. In 50% of survey respondents, the role in app development is defined as a research assistant. We conclude that there is a varying degree of software engineering knowledge in the sports science app development context (Q1). Furthermore, we found that the role of sports scientists within app development is not sufficiently defined (Q2). We present recommendations for improving the success probability and sustainability of app development and give orientation on the potential roles of sports scientists as domain experts. Future research should focus on the generalizability of these findings and the reporting of the app development process.
数字健康领域正在迅速发展。在学术机构以外的出版商中,只有4%参与其中,因此它在应用程序开发中的代表性不足。本研究的目的是通过系统综述和在一个典型学术环境中的调查,围绕以下研究问题评估应用程序开发的现状:(问题1)软件工程原则在体育科学应用程序开发背景下是否广为人知?(问题2)体育科学家在应用程序开发背景下的作用是否得到充分理解?系统综述由两名独立评审员在PubMed、Scopus、科学网和IEEE Xplore数据库中进行。使用PICO模式来确定搜索词。我们提取了关于五个主要主题的信息:开发过程、功能需求和特性、安全性、技术以及传播。该调查由一个多学科团队开展,聚焦于五个主要主题。在701条匹配项中,有21条被纳入综述。只有七项研究描述了开发过程。11项研究考虑了功能需求和特性,3项研究涉及安全性,13项研究涉及技术,12项研究涉及传播,细节各不相同。12名受访者(平均年龄33[7]岁,58%为女性)回复了调查。调查显示,在安全措施的实施、基础技术和源代码管理以及传播方面,知识有限。受访者能够就开发过程以及功能需求和特性提供意见。七项综述研究提到了领域专家的参与,另有两项研究对此进行了描述。在50%的调查受访者中,应用程序开发中的角色被定义为研究助理。我们得出结论,在体育科学应用程序开发背景下,软件工程知识的掌握程度各不相同(问题1)。此外,我们发现体育科学家在应用程序开发中的作用没有得到充分界定(问题2)。我们提出了提高应用程序开发成功率和可持续性的建议,并明确了体育科学家作为领域专家的潜在作用。未来的研究应关注这些发现的普遍性以及应用程序开发过程的报告。