Suppr超能文献

概念图在印度医学教育背景下评估高阶思维的适用性:生理学学科的一项分析研究

Applicability of Concept Maps to Assess Higher Order Thinking in the Context of Indian Medical Education: An Analytical Study in the Subject of Physiology.

作者信息

Agarwal Prerna, Bhandari Bharti, Gupta Vivek, Panwar Aprajita, Datta Anjum

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Greater Noida - 201310, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2023 Jan;11(1):24-33. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2022.95660.1653.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Concept mapping is a multidimensional tool that has been put to little use in India. We designed this study to check its applicability for assessing higher-order thinking in the subject of Physiology.

METHODS

This interventional analytical study was carried out among 65 students of Phase I of MBBS in the year 2021. The students were sensitized to the technique and were given a practice session. On a pre-informed date, an assessment of a topic taught to them was done using concept mapping and a multiple-choice question (MCQ) based test. Feedback on the technique was taken from the students. The statistical tests used were test of normality - Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test, significance of association - Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, correlation - Spearman's correlation, and agreement - Bland Altman Analysis. The discrimination index was calculated for both concept mapping and MCQ based tests, separately. Percentages were calculated for feedback questionnaire items. The data were analysed using Microsoft Excel (2019) and an online calculator. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Students scored more in concept mapping. There was a significant difference in the scores of the students on the two tests (Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test, Z=-2.66, p=0.008) and a weakly positive non-significant correlation between them (Spearman's correlation coefficient, r=0.07 p=0.60). Bland Altman's Analysis showed agreement in the scores of the students in the two tests. The mean score of the students in the two tests increased, so did the difference in the scores in the two tests. The discrimination index of concept mapping (0.28) was higher than that of the MCQ-based test (0.18). Most of the students agreed on the advantages of concept mapping in the feedback.

CONCLUSION

The assessment result of concept mapping is better than that of MCQ-based test and it may be included as a teaching-learning and assessment strategy in the context of Indian medical education in the subject of Physiology.

摘要

引言

概念图是一种多维度工具,在印度很少被使用。我们设计了这项研究,以检验其在评估生理学学科高阶思维方面的适用性。

方法

这项干预性分析研究于2021年在65名医学学士一年级学生中进行。向学生介绍了该技术并安排了一次练习课。在预先通知的日期,使用概念图和基于多项选择题(MCQ)的测试对他们所学的一个主题进行评估。收集了学生对该技术的反馈。所使用的统计测试包括正态性检验——柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验、关联性显著性检验——威尔科克森符号秩检验、相关性检验——斯皮尔曼相关性检验以及一致性检验——布兰德-奥特曼分析。分别计算了概念图测试和基于MCQ测试的区分指数。计算了反馈问卷项目的百分比。使用Microsoft Excel(2019)和在线计算器对数据进行分析。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学显著性。

结果

学生在概念图测试中的得分更高。两次测试中学生的分数存在显著差异(威尔科克森符号秩检验,Z = -2.66,p = 0.008),且两者之间存在微弱的正相关但不显著(斯皮尔曼相关系数,r = 0.07,p = 0.60)。布兰德-奥特曼分析表明两次测试中学生的分数具有一致性。两次测试中学生的平均分数都有所提高,两次测试分数的差异也有所增加。概念图的区分指数(0.28)高于基于MCQ的测试(0.18)。大多数学生在反馈中认可概念图的优点。

结论

概念图的评估结果优于基于MCQ的测试,在印度生理学学科医学教育背景下,它可作为一种教学和评估策略纳入其中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f0b/9846098/0e955086aa58/JAMP-11-24-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验