• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第一秒用力呼气容积/用力肺活量比值对接受双联抗血小板药物治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者临床结局的影响

The Impact of FEV1/FVC Ratio on the Clinical Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Treated with Dual Anti-Platelet Agents.

作者信息

Yeh Chia-Hung, Chung Wen-Jung, Chen Tien-Yu, Wu Po-Jui, Tseng Chien-Hao, Lee Chien-Ho, Cheng Cheng-I

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023 Jan;39(1):116-126. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202301_39(1).20220601A.

DOI:10.6515/ACS.202301_39(1).20220601A
PMID:36685154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9829852/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated the clinical efficacy and pulmonary side effects of different P2Y12 inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of forced expiratory volume in 1 second over forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio on the clinical outcomes in ACS patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

ACS patients who underwent PCI, had documented pre-existing spirometry tests, and received aspirin with either ticagrelor or clopidogrel were enrolled for retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

Of the enrolled ACS patients, 275 and 247 received ticagrelor and clopidogrel, respectively. The incidence of wheeze was significantly higher in the ticagrelor group compared to the clopidogrel group within 360 days (14.91% vs. 8.09%, p = 0.016). Multivariable analysis revealed that ticagrelor treatment, as compared to clopidogrel treatment, independently predicted 1-year hospitalization for acute exacerbation (AE) of obstructive airway disease (hazard ratio: 3.44; 95% confidence interval: 1.92 to 6.15; p < 0.01). The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that an FEV1/FVC ratio of 63.85% had the highest sensitivity and specificity for predicting the incidence of AE of obstructive airway disease within 1 year (p < 0.001). The 1-year hospitalization rate for AE of obstructive airway disease was significantly higher in the ticagrelor group when the FEV1/FVC ratio was < 63%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated higher incidence of wheeze and hospitalization for AE of obstructive airway disease in ACS patients treated with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel. Furthermore, the FEV1/FVC ratio ≤ 63% in the ACS patients predicted hospitalization for AE of obstructive airway disease in 1 year.

摘要

背景

很少有研究调查不同P2Y12抑制剂在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中的临床疗效和肺部副作用。本研究的目的是探讨经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后接受双联抗血小板治疗的ACS患者中,一秒用力呼气容积与用力肺活量之比(FEV1/FVC)对临床结局的影响。

方法

纳入接受PCI、有既往肺功能检查记录且接受阿司匹林联合替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷治疗的ACS患者进行回顾性分析。

结果

在纳入的ACS患者中,分别有275例和247例接受了替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷治疗。在360天内,替格瑞洛组的喘息发生率显著高于氯吡格雷组(14.91%对8.09%,p = 0.016)。多变量分析显示,与氯吡格雷治疗相比,替格瑞洛治疗独立预测阻塞性气道疾病急性加重(AE)的1年住院率(风险比:3.44;95%置信区间:1.92至6.15;p < 0.01)。受试者工作特征曲线表明,FEV1/FVC比值为63.85%时,预测1年内阻塞性气道疾病AE发生率的敏感性和特异性最高(p < 0.001)。当FEV1/FVC比值< 63%时,替格瑞洛组阻塞性气道疾病AE的1年住院率显著更高。

结论

本研究表明,与氯吡格雷相比,接受替格瑞洛治疗的ACS患者中,阻塞性气道疾病AE的喘息和住院发生率更高。此外,ACS患者中FEV1/FVC比值≤ 63%可预测1年内阻塞性气道疾病AE的住院情况。

相似文献

1
The Impact of FEV1/FVC Ratio on the Clinical Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Treated with Dual Anti-Platelet Agents.第一秒用力呼气容积/用力肺活量比值对接受双联抗血小板药物治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者临床结局的影响
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023 Jan;39(1):116-126. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202301_39(1).20220601A.
2
Assessing the Clinical Treatment Dynamics of Antiplatelet Therapy Following Acute Coronary Syndrome and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the US.评估美国急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板治疗的临床治疗动态。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238585. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8585.
3
Dabigatran dual therapy with ticagrelor or clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention in atrial fibrillation patients with or without acute coronary syndrome: a subgroup analysis from the RE-DUAL PCI trial.达比加群双重治疗联合替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷在伴有或不伴有急性冠脉综合征的房颤患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的亚组分析:来自 RE-DUAL PCI 试验的结果。
Eur Heart J. 2019 May 14;40(19):1553-1562. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz059.
4
Serum uric acid levels during dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor or clopidogrel: Results from a single-centre study.替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗期间的血清尿酸水平:一项单中心研究的结果
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Jul;26(7):567-574. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
5
Association of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel With Major Adverse Coronary Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要不良冠状动脉事件的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Mar 1;180(3):420-428. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6447.
6
Comparison of Net Clinical Benefit Between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients in China With Acute Coronary Syndrome.中国急性冠脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛的净临床获益比较。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jan;39(1):754-766. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01907-3. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
7
Effect of ticagrelor and clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy on MPVLR, MAADP, and AA inhibition rate in acute coronary syndrome patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者血小板平均体积与血小板容积比、最大血小板聚集率和花生四烯酸抑制率的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 15;102(37):e34974. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034974.
8
Comparison of P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Australian Population.澳大利亚人群中急性冠脉综合征的 P2Y12 抑制剂比较。
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Aug;31(8):1085-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 May 17.
9
Prasugrel (Efient®) with percutaneous coronary intervention for treating acute coronary syndromes (review of TA182): systematic review and economic analysis.普拉格雷(Efient®)联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征(TA182综述):系统评价与经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Apr;19(29):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta19290.
10
Contemporary antiplatelet treatment in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: 1-year outcomes from the GReek AntiPlatElet (GRAPE) Registry.急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的当代抗血小板治疗:来自希腊抗血小板(GRAPE)注册研究的 1 年结果。
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jun;14(6):1146-54. doi: 10.1111/jth.13316. Epub 2016 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Should Ticagrelor Be Used with Caution in Patients with Low FEV1/FVC?对于第一秒用力呼气容积/用力肺活量(FEV1/FVC)低的患者,是否应谨慎使用替格瑞洛?
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023 Nov;39(6):945. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202311_39(6).20230529A.

本文引用的文献

1
A Cohort Study to Evaluate the Risk of Hospitalisation for Congestive Heart Failure Associated with the Use of Aclidinium and Other Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Medications in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.一项在英国临床实践研究数据库中评估使用阿地氯铵和其他慢性阻塞性肺疾病药物与充血性心力衰竭住院风险相关的队列研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 May 31;16:1461-1475. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S301624. eCollection 2021.
2
Global Initiative for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. The 2020 GOLD Science Committee Report on COVID-19 and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断、管理和预防倡议。2020 年 GOLD 科学委员会关于 COVID-19 和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的报告。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan 1;203(1):24-36. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202009-3533SO.
3
Association of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel With Net Adverse Clinical Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者净临床不良事件的影响。
JAMA. 2020 Oct 27;324(16):1640-1650. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.16167.
4
The risk of dyspnea in patients treated with third-generation P2Y inhibitors compared with clopidogrel: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.与氯吡格雷相比,第三代 P2Y 抑制剂治疗患者发生呼吸困难的风险:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01419-y.
5
Ticagrelor Increases and mRNA Levels in Peripheral Blood Cells from Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.替格瑞洛增加稳定型冠状动脉疾病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者外周血细胞和 mRNA 水平。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 25;21(5):1576. doi: 10.3390/ijms21051576.
6
Association of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel With Major Adverse Coronary Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要不良冠状动脉事件的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Mar 1;180(3):420-428. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6447.
7
Antiplatelet therapy in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled proof-of-concept trial.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者心血管疾病一级预防中的抗血小板治疗:一项随机对照概念验证试验
ERJ Open Res. 2019 Aug 5;5(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00110-2019. eCollection 2019 Jul.
8
Increased risk of major adverse cardiac events following the onset of acute exacerbations of COPD.COPD 急性加重后发生主要不良心脏事件的风险增加。
Respirology. 2019 Dec;24(12):1183-1190. doi: 10.1111/resp.13620. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
9
Ticagrelor in patients with heart failure after acute coronary syndromes-Insights from the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.替格瑞洛在急性冠状动脉综合征后心力衰竭患者中的应用——来自血小板抑制和患者结局(PLATO)试验的见解。
Am Heart J. 2019 Jul;213:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
10
β-blockers after acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A nationwide population-based observational study.β 受体阻滞剂在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者急性心肌梗死后的应用:一项全国范围内基于人群的观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 5;14(3):e0213187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213187. eCollection 2019.