Suppr超能文献

匈牙利版认知失误问卷(CFQ)的效度验证。

Validation of the Hungarian version of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ).

作者信息

Volosin Márta, Hallgató Emese, Csábi Eszter

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Szeged, H-6722 Szeged, Egyetem utca 2, Hungary.

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, H-1117 Budapest, Magyar tudósok körútja 2, Hungary.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Jan 10;9(1):e12910. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12910. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) is a widely utilized tool to measure the frequency of everyday cognitive lapses. Here we present a validation study of the Hungarian translation of CFQ. A subsample (n = 157) filled out the questionnaire twice within a 7-21 days interval to determine test-retest reliability. Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) method was run on a larger sample (n = 382) for testing a different number of potential factors. Although the multiple-factor solutions showed good fit, the one-factor solution described the data more adequately. The composite reliability of the final model (CR = .822) as well as test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = .900) and the internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .920) of the CFQ were high. Higher CFQ scores (i.e., more cognitive slips) correlated positively with anxiety and depression while a negative relationship was present with well-being. Furthermore, women were characterized with higher CFQ scores compared to men. Our results are in line with previous studies, and the excellent psychometric properties make the Hungarian version of CFQ an appropriate measure of cognitive failures.

摘要

认知失误问卷(CFQ)是一种广泛用于测量日常认知失误频率的工具。在此,我们展示了CFQ匈牙利语翻译版的效度研究。一个子样本(n = 157)在7至21天的间隔内填写了两次问卷,以确定重测信度。对一个更大的样本(n = 382)采用探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)方法来测试不同数量的潜在因子。尽管多因子解决方案显示出良好的拟合度,但单因子解决方案对数据的描述更充分。最终模型的组合信度(CR = 0.822)以及CFQ的重测信度(组内相关系数 = 0.900)和内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.920)都很高。较高的CFQ得分(即更多的认知失误)与焦虑和抑郁呈正相关,而与幸福感呈负相关。此外,女性的CFQ得分高于男性。我们的结果与先前的研究一致,并且出色的心理测量特性使匈牙利语版的CFQ成为认知失误的合适测量工具。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Hungarian version of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ).
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 10;9(1):e12910. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12910. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
A confirmatory factor analysis for an adapted and validated Polish version of the e.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020 Jan 17;33(1):67-76. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01497. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
4
Psychometric properties of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire.
Ergonomics. 2013;56(10):1515-24. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.821172. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
5
Brazilian version of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ): cross-cultural adaptation and evidence of validity and reliability.
Braz J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul-Sep;40(3):312-315. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2227. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
6
Psychometric properties of the Albanian version of chewing-function questionnaire CFQ-ALB.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Mar 3;14:38. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0437-3.
7
Development of a new chewing function questionnaire for assessment of a self-perceived chewing function.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;41(6):565-73. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12048. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
8
Cross-cultural validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International to assess concerns about falls among Hungarian community-living older people.
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Dec;40(25):3070-3075. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1366555. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Lost in Thought or Just Lonely? Everyday Cognitive Competence in Middle Adulthood.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Apr 10;15(4):58. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15040058.
2
Tinnitus-associated cognitive and psychological impairments: a comprehensive review meta-analysis.
Front Neurosci. 2024 Feb 8;18:1275560. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1275560. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisiting the factor structure and construct validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire.
Psychol Assess. 2022 Jul;34(7):671-683. doi: 10.1037/pas0001127. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
2
Dimensionality and Determinants of Self-Reported Cognitive Failures.
Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2018 Jan-Jun;11(1):9-18. doi: 10.21500/20112084.3213.
3
A Primer to (Cross-Cultural) Multi-Group Invariance Testing Possibilities in R.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 18;10:1507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01507. eCollection 2019.
4
The lack of meaningful association between depression severity measures and neurocognitive performance.
J Affect Disord. 2018 Dec 1;241:164-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.034. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
5
Cognitive failures in late adulthood: The role of age, social context and depressive symptoms.
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):e0189683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189683. eCollection 2017.
6
Brazilian version of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ): cross-cultural adaptation and evidence of validity and reliability.
Braz J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul-Sep;40(3):312-315. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2227. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
7
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
8
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
9
A systematic review of cognitive failures in daily life: Healthy populations.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Apr;63:29-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验