• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Is the information on infection prevention measures against COVID-19 reaching the target audience? A cross-sectional survey among eating and drinking services in Tokyo, Japan.关于新冠病毒感染预防措施的信息是否传达给了目标受众?日本东京饮食服务业的一项横断面调查。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2023 Jan 14;5:100357. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100357. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the Remote Early Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的远程早期检测的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Oct 11;22(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05643-5.
4
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the remote early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对远程早期检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05241-5.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
6
A short, animated video to improve good COVID-19 hygiene practices: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一个用于改善良好 COVID-19 卫生习惯的简短动画视频:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04449-1.
7
[Impact of COVID-19 on Japanese municipal public health nurses and public health practices related to communication with community residents].[新型冠状病毒肺炎对日本市政公共卫生护士及与社区居民沟通相关公共卫生实践的影响]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2022 Mar 23;69(3):225-235. doi: 10.11236/jph.21-054. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
8
Reasons for being unsure or unwilling regarding intention to take COVID-19 vaccine among Japanese people: A large cross-sectional national survey.日本人对接种新冠疫苗意愿不确定或不愿意的原因:一项大型全国性横断面调查。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Sep;14:100223. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100223. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
9
The effectiveness of web-based programs on the reduction of childhood obesity in school-aged children: A systematic review.基于网络的项目对学龄儿童肥胖症减轻的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-14. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-248.
10
[Factors associated with behaviors to prevent COVID-19 infection during the declaration of emergency: A study among Tokyo residents].[紧急声明期间与预防COVID-19感染行为相关的因素:东京居民的一项研究]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2021 Sep 7;68(9):597-607. doi: 10.11236/jph.20-112. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioemotional Selectivity Theory: The Role of Perceived Endings in Human Motivation.社会情绪选择理论:感知终点在人类动机中的作用。
Gerontologist. 2021 Nov 15;61(8):1188-1196. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab116.
2
Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on major industries in Japan: A dynamic conditional correlation approach.评估新冠疫情对日本主要行业的影响:动态条件相关方法。
Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Dec;58:101488. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101488. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
3
The Covid-19 Infodemic - Applying the Epidemiologic Model to Counter Misinformation.新冠疫情信息疫情——应用流行病学模型应对错误信息
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 19;385(8):678-681. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2103798. Epub 2021 May 12.
4
Gathering, processing, and interpreting information about COVID-19.收集、处理和解读有关新冠病毒的信息。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 22;11(1):6569. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86088-3.
5
[Daily information-gathering behavior of natural disaster victims: Focusing on residents who experienced the Great East Japan Earthquake and the Kanto-Tohoku Heavy Rainfall Disaster].[自然灾害受害者的日常信息收集行为:以经历东日本大地震和关东-东北暴雨灾害的居民为重点]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2021 Apr 23;68(4):221-229. doi: 10.11236/jph.20-093. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
6
COVID-19 Outbreak Associated with Air Conditioning in Restaurant, Guangzhou, China, 2020.2020年中国广州某餐厅与空调相关的新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;26(11):2791-2793. doi: 10.3201/eid2611.203774. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
7
Elderly people and responses to COVID-19 in 27 Countries.27 个国家的老年人及其对 COVID-19 的反应。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235590. eCollection 2020.
8
How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?基于国家的缓解措施将如何影响新冠疫情的发展进程?
Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):931-934. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
9
A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.2019 年中国肺炎患者中的一种新型冠状病毒。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
10
Evidence on the effectiveness of health literacy interventions in the EU: a systematic review.欧盟健康素养干预措施有效性的证据:一项系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):1414. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6331-7.

关于新冠病毒感染预防措施的信息是否传达给了目标受众?日本东京饮食服务业的一项横断面调查。

Is the information on infection prevention measures against COVID-19 reaching the target audience? A cross-sectional survey among eating and drinking services in Tokyo, Japan.

作者信息

Shiozawa Ayako, Ogihara Shinji, Ishii Yoshikazu, Tateda Kazuhiro

机构信息

Department of Collaborative Regional Infection Control, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2023 Jan 14;5:100357. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100357. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100357
PMID:36686983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9840524/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study aims to evaluate information gathering behaviour (IGB) and its effectiveness in eating and drinking services for infection control during COVID-19.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey using anonymous self-administered questionnaires was conducted in October 2021. Participants were asked what IGB they use to obtain infection control measures, to what extent they understand the measures (and, if they do not understand them, what inhibits their comprehension), and which IGBs they do not currently use and why.

METHODS

The sample included 957 eating and drinking services in Ota City, Tokyo. The response rate was 14.5%. Binomial logistic regression was used to analyse the factors associated with the baseline characteristics using Stata v.17.0.

RESULTS

The highest proportion of respondents used television (88.0%); another large proportion (38.9%) used guidelines. Regarding difficulty in understanding the retrieved information, 'difficulty in coming up with specific actions' had the highest ratio for every IGB. Regarding reasons for not currently using IGB, 'it takes too much time to extract the necessary information' showed the highest ratios of all IGBs. Individuals over 60 years had a negative relationship with the use of guidelines and the Internet. Participants also advised that they did not use time-consuming guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Current information dissemination methods for information on COVID-19 infection control may not successfully convey information or reach their target populations. This study indicates the need for specific expressions and layouts to effectively share information on COVID-19. Also, special means of communication must be established to cater to individuals aged 60 and above.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估信息收集行为(IGB)及其在新冠疫情期间饮食服务感染控制中的有效性。

研究设计

2021年10月采用匿名自填问卷进行了横断面调查。参与者被问及他们使用何种IGB来获取感染控制措施,他们对这些措施的理解程度(以及如果不理解,是什么阻碍了他们的理解),以及他们目前未使用的IGB及其原因。

方法

样本包括东京大田市的957家饮食服务场所。回复率为14.5%。使用Stata v.17.0软件进行二项逻辑回归分析与基线特征相关的因素。

结果

使用电视的受访者比例最高(88.0%);另一个较大比例(38.9%)使用指南。关于理解检索到的信息的困难程度,“难以想出具体行动”在每种IGB中所占比例最高。关于目前不使用IGB的原因,“提取必要信息花费时间过长”在所有IGB中所占比例最高。60岁以上的人使用指南和互联网的情况呈负相关。参与者还表示他们不使用耗时的指南。

结论

目前关于新冠病毒感染控制信息的传播方法可能无法成功传达信息或覆盖目标人群。本研究表明需要特定的表达方式和布局来有效分享新冠病毒相关信息。此外,必须建立特殊的沟通方式以满足60岁及以上人群的需求。