Gastroenterology and Liver Services, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney 2139, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney 2138, Australia.
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 14;29(2):378-389. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i2.378.
BACKGROUND: Histological remission is increasingly accepted as a treatment endpoint in the management of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the knowledge of histology guidelines and the attitudes towards their use in clinical practice by gastroenterologists and pathologists is unknown. AIM: To evaluate the knowledge of histology guidelines and attitudes towards the use of histology in UC by gastroenterologists and pathologists. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional nationwide survey of gastroenterologists and pathologists who analyse UC specimens was conducted. The survey consisted of 34 questions to assess gastroenterologists' and pathologists' knowledge (score out of 19) and attitudes towards histological assessment in UC. Survey questions were formulated using the European Crohn's and Colitis position paper on histopathology and the British Society of Gastroenterology biopsy reporting guidelines. It included knowledge of histological assessment of disease activity and dysplasia, knowledge of histological scoring systems for ulcerative colitis, uptake of histology scoring systems in routine practice, attitudes towards the role of histological activity, and the use of histological activity in clinical scenarios. RESULTS: Of 89 responders (77 gastroenterologists, 12 pathologists), there was almost universal acceptance that histological assessment should form part of UC evaluation [95% gastroenterologists, 92% pathologists]. However, gastroenterologists reported that 92% of their pathologists do not use a histological scoring system. Utilisation of a formal histological scoring system was preferred by 77% of gastroenterologists and 58% of pathologists. Both groups lacked awareness of the Geboes Score, Nancy Index and Robarts Histopathological Index scoring systems with 91%, 87%, and 92% of gastroenterologists respectively; and 83%, 83%, and 92% pathologists respectively, being uncertain of scoring systems' remission definitions. Histology knowledge score was not significantly different between gastroenterologists and pathologists [9/19 (IQR: 8-11) 8/19 (IQR: 7-10), = 0.54]. Higher knowledge scores were predicted by hospital attending gastroenterologists ( = 0.004), participation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) multidisciplinary teams ( = 0.009), and self-declared IBD sub-specialist ( = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Histological remission is a recognised target for both gastroenterologists and pathologists. Despite this, knowledge of histological scoring systems and their utilisation is poor.
背景:组织学缓解越来越被接受为溃疡性结肠炎(UC)治疗的终点。然而,胃肠病学家和病理学家对组织学指南的了解及其在临床实践中的应用态度尚不清楚。
目的:评估胃肠病学家和病理学家对 UC 组织学指南的了解程度以及对其在 UC 中的应用的态度。
方法:对分析 UC 标本的胃肠病学家和病理学家进行了一项前瞻性、横断面全国性调查。该调查由 34 个问题组成,用于评估胃肠病学家和病理学家对疾病活动和发育不良的组织学评估、溃疡性结肠炎组织学评分系统的知识、在常规实践中采用组织学评分系统、对组织学活动的作用的态度以及在临床情况下使用组织学活动的态度。调查问题是使用欧洲克罗恩病和结肠炎组织病理学立场文件和英国胃肠病学会活检报告指南制定的。它包括对疾病活动和发育不良的组织学评估、溃疡性结肠炎组织学评分系统的知识、在常规实践中采用组织学评分系统、对组织学活动的作用的态度以及在临床情况下使用组织学活动的态度。
结果:在 89 名应答者(77 名胃肠病学家,12 名病理学家)中,几乎普遍认为组织学评估应成为 UC 评估的一部分[95%的胃肠病学家,92%的病理学家]。然而,胃肠病学家报告说,他们的病理学家中有 92%不使用组织学评分系统。77%的胃肠病学家和 58%的病理学家更喜欢使用正式的组织学评分系统。两组对 Geboes 评分、Nancy 指数和 Robarts 组织病理学指数评分系统的认识都不足,分别有 91%、87%和 92%的胃肠病学家;分别有 83%、83%和 92%的病理学家不确定评分系统的缓解定义。胃肠病学家和病理学家之间的组织学知识评分没有显著差异[9/19(IQR:8-11)8/19(IQR:7-10),=0.54]。较高的知识评分与医院主治胃肠病学家(=0.004)、参与炎症性肠病(IBD)多学科团队(=0.009)和自我宣布的 IBD 亚专科医生(=0.03)相关。
结论:组织学缓解是胃肠病学家和病理学家都认可的目标。尽管如此,对组织学评分系统及其应用的了解仍然很差。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023-1-14
United European Gastroenterol J. 2023-7
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018-3
J Crohns Colitis. 2020-11-7
J Crohns Colitis. 2022-7-14
J Clin Med. 2024-1-4
United European Gastroenterol J. 2023-10
J Crohns Colitis. 2020-11-7
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020-2
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-5-25
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017-2-24
Lancet. 2016-12-1
Gut. 2015-10-16