Chaemsupaphan Thanaboon, Pudipeddi Aviv, Lin Huiyu, Wu Hsin-Yun, Limsrivilai Julajak, Lim Wee Chian, Wei Shu-Chen, Leong Rupert W
Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Services, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Intest Res. 2025 Jul;23(3):338-346. doi: 10.5217/ir.2024.00086. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recently, histological mucosal assessment has gained momentum as a potential new treatment target for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the Asia-Pacific region. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the knowledge and acceptability of histological assessment among gastroenterologists across the region.
A cross-sectional survey among gastroenterologists in the Asia-Pacific region was conducted and compared against a previous Australian survey. The questionnaire assessed knowledge and attitude towards the role and application of histology in IBD practice. Statistical analyses were employed to compare scores and identify predictors.
A total of 221 gastroenterologists from 12 countries, including 77 (34.8%) from Australia, responded to questionnaire, with 185 (83.7%) completing the survey. The mean knowledge score was 9.8 ± 3.3 (51.6%). There was no significant difference in the average score among countries (P= 0.53). IBD specialist (P< 0.01), doctoral degree (P= 0.02), and regular participation in IBD multidisciplinary meetings (P= 0.01) were associated with higher scores. Most respondents (90.7%) agreed on the importance of histology in IBD. While 54.6% of Australians perceived the role of histology as established, only 37.0% of Asians respondents considered this similarly (P= 0.02). Histological activity alone minimally influences treatment escalation in patients with endoscopic remission, but achieving combined histo-endoscopic remission often leads to therapy de-escalation.
Although gastroenterologists in the Asia-Pacific region are aware of the role of histology in IBD, their knowledge remains limited, and its clinical utility is not widely adopted. There is a need to promote the routine use of standardized histological assessment in IBD practice.
背景/目的:近年来,组织学黏膜评估作为亚太地区炎症性肠病(IBD)患者潜在的新治疗靶点受到越来越多的关注。本研究旨在评估和比较该地区胃肠病学家对组织学评估的了解程度和接受程度。
对亚太地区的胃肠病学家进行了一项横断面调查,并与之前澳大利亚的一项调查进行比较。问卷评估了对组织学在IBD实践中的作用和应用的了解程度及态度。采用统计分析来比较得分并确定预测因素。
来自12个国家的221名胃肠病学家回复了问卷,其中77名(34.8%)来自澳大利亚,185名(83.7%)完成了调查。平均知识得分为9.8±3.3(51.6%)。各国之间的平均得分无显著差异(P = 0.53)。IBD专科医生(P < 0.01)、博士学位(P = 0.02)以及定期参加IBD多学科会议(P = 0.01)与较高得分相关。大多数受访者(90.7%)认同组织学在IBD中的重要性。虽然54.6%的澳大利亚人认为组织学的作用已确立,但只有37.0%的亚洲受访者持类似看法(P = 0.02)。在内镜缓解的患者中,仅组织学活动对治疗升级的影响最小,但实现组织学 - 内镜联合缓解通常会导致治疗降级。
尽管亚太地区的胃肠病学家了解组织学在IBD中的作用,但其知识仍然有限,其临床应用尚未得到广泛采用。有必要在IBD实践中推广标准化组织学评估的常规使用。