Eidelman Pozin Inna, Zabida Amir, Friedman Zeev, Ivry Michal, Friedman Maria, Zahavi Guy, Yahav Shafir Dana D, Orkin Dina, Berkenstadt Haim
Department of Anaesthesiology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Department of Anaesthesia, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2023 Mar;51(2):114-119. doi: 10.1177/0310057X221113591. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
Given the severity of the consequences of operating room fires, it is recommended that every anaesthesiologist master fire safety protocols and periodically participate in operating room fire drills. The aim of the present study was to evaluate skill retention one year after an airway fire training programme. Anaesthesiology residents were evaluated using an airway fire simulation-based scenario one year after an educational programme that included a one-h long problem-based learning session, a simulation-based airway fire drill with debriefing, and a formal group discussion. The same simulation scenario was used for both the initial training and the one-year assessment. Thirty-eight anaesthesiology residents participated as pairs in the initial training programme. Of these, 36 participated in the evaluation a year later. Performance after one year was better than performance during the initial simulation. Time to removal of tracheal tube was 7.0 (4.0-12.8) s (median (interquartile range)) at the one-year assessment compared with 22.0 (18.5-52.5) s at the time of initial training ( < 0.001). Performance improvement was also demonstrated by a higher incidence of performance of crucial action items (cessation of airway gases, removal of sponges and pouring of saline), as well as shorter duration of time necessary to perform these tasks. After controlling the fire, the time to re-establish ventilation by bag-mask ventilation or intubation was shorter at one year: 18.0 (11.0-29.0 ) s, compared with initial training 54.0 s (36.2-69.8) s ( = 0.001). We conclude that skills are effectively retained for a year after an airway fire management training session.
鉴于手术室火灾后果的严重性,建议每位麻醉医生掌握消防安全规程,并定期参加手术室火灾演练。本研究的目的是评估气道火灾培训项目一年后的技能保持情况。在一个教育项目一年后,使用基于气道火灾模拟的场景对麻醉科住院医师进行评估,该教育项目包括一个长达一小时的基于问题的学习课程、一次带有汇报环节的基于模拟的气道火灾演练以及一次正式的小组讨论。初始培训和一年后的评估都使用相同的模拟场景。38名麻醉科住院医师成对参加了初始培训项目。其中,36人一年后参加了评估。一年后的表现优于初始模拟时的表现。在一年后的评估中,气管导管拔除时间为7.0(4.0 - 12.8)秒(中位数(四分位间距)),而初始培训时为22.0(18.5 - 52.5)秒(<0.001)。关键行动项目(停止气道气体供应、移除海绵和灌注生理盐水)的执行发生率更高,以及执行这些任务所需的时间更短,也证明了表现有所改善。控制火灾后,通过袋 - 面罩通气或插管重新建立通气的时间在一年后更短:18.0(11.0 - 29.0)秒,而初始培训时为54.0秒(36.2 - 69.8)秒(=0.001)。我们得出结论,气道火灾管理培训课程后,技能可有效保持一年。