Suppr超能文献

长效促性腺激素释放激素激动剂长方案对接受试管婴儿治疗的子宫内膜异位症患者更有效吗?

Is the long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist long protocol better for patients with endometriosis undergoing IVF?

机构信息

Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, China.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Jul;162(1):325-332. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14690. Epub 2023 Feb 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of the long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) long protocol on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes of patients with endometriosis (EMs).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was carried out from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2021. In all, 798 patients with EMs who underwent first IVF were enrolled. The patients were classified by the ovarian stimulation protocols. The clinical outcomes of IVF were compared in each group.

RESULTS

Those EMs patients who received the long-acting GnRHa long protocol had significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (72.00%, 60.70% and 50.90%, respectively; P = 0.047 and 0.010) and implantation rate (51.0%, 44.6%, and 38.7%, respectively; P = 0.006 and <0.001) compared with the short-acting GnRHa long protocol and the GnRH antagonist protocol. Live birth rate was also significantly higher than the GnRH antagonist protocol (60.10% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.032), but not statistically different from the short-acting GnRHa (60.10% vs. 53.80%, P = 0.443). In addition, they also had significantly higher duration of stimulation, total dose of gonadotropin, and number of high-quality embryos transferred compared with other groups (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-acting GnRHa long protocol could improve IVF outcomes of patients with EMs compared with the short-acting GnRHa long protocol and the GnRH antagonist protocol.

摘要

目的

探讨长效促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)长方案对子宫内膜异位症(EMs)患者体外受精(IVF)结局的影响。

方法

本回顾性队列研究于 2016 年 7 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日进行。共纳入 798 例接受首次 IVF 的 EMs 患者。根据卵巢刺激方案对患者进行分类,比较各组 IVF 的临床结局。

结果

接受长效 GnRHa 长方案的 EMs 患者的临床妊娠率(分别为 72.00%、60.70%和 50.90%;P=0.047 和 0.010)和种植率(分别为 51.0%、44.6%和 38.7%;P=0.006 和 <0.001)显著高于短效 GnRHa 长方案和 GnRH 拮抗剂方案。活产率也显著高于 GnRH 拮抗剂方案(60.10% vs. 40.0%,P=0.032),但与短效 GnRHa 方案无统计学差异(60.10% vs. 53.80%,P=0.443)。此外,与其他组相比,他们的促排卵时间、促性腺激素总剂量和高质量胚胎移植数量也显著增加(P<0.001)。

结论

与短效 GnRHa 长方案和 GnRH 拮抗剂方案相比,长效 GnRHa 长方案可改善 EMs 患者的 IVF 结局。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验