Suppr超能文献

住院患者的药物审查以降低发病率和死亡率。

Medication review in hospitalised patients to reduce morbidity and mortality.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.

The Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 23;1(1):CD008986. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008986.pub4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A medication review can be defined as a structured evaluation of a patient's medication conducted by healthcare professionals with the aim of optimising medication use and improving health outcomes. Optimising medication therapy though medication reviews may benefit hospitalised patients.

OBJECTIVES

We examined the effects of medication review interventions in hospitalised adult patients compared to standard care or to other types of medication reviews on all-cause mortality, hospital readmissions, emergency department contacts and health-related quality of life.

SEARCH METHODS

In this Cochrane Review update, we searched for new published and unpublished trials using the following electronic databases from 1 January 2014 to 17 January 2022 without language restrictions: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). To identify additional trials, we searched the reference lists of included trials and other publications by lead trial authors, and contacted experts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials of medication reviews delivered by healthcare professionals for hospitalised adult patients. We excluded trials including outpatients and paediatric patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We contacted trial authors for data clarification and relevant unpublished data. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) for continuous data (with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)). We used the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the overall certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

In this updated review, we included a total of 25 trials (15,076 participants), of which 15 were new trials (11,501 participants). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 20 months. We found that medication reviews in hospitalised adults may have little to no effect on mortality (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.05; 18 trials, 10,108 participants; low-certainty evidence); likely reduce hospital readmissions (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.98; 17 trials, 9561 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); may reduce emergency department contacts (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.03; 8 trials, 3527 participants; low-certainty evidence) and have very uncertain effects on health-related quality of life (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.30; 4 trials, 392 participants; very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Medication reviews in hospitalised adult patients likely reduce hospital readmissions and may reduce emergency department contacts. The evidence suggests that mediation reviews may have little to no effect on mortality, while the effect on health-related quality of life is very uncertain. Almost all trials included elderly polypharmacy patients, which limits the generalisability of the results beyond this population.

摘要

背景

药物审查可以定义为医疗保健专业人员对患者用药进行的结构化评估,旨在优化药物使用并改善健康结果。通过药物审查优化药物治疗可能使住院患者受益。

目的

我们研究了与标准护理或其他类型的药物审查相比,住院成年患者的药物审查干预措施对全因死亡率、医院再入院、急诊就诊和健康相关生活质量的影响。

检索方法

在本次 Cochrane 综述更新中,我们使用以下电子数据库从 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 1 月 17 日检索了新发表和未发表的试验,无语言限制:Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、Embase、护理和联合健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、ClinicalTrials.gov 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)。为了确定其他试验,我们检索了纳入试验的参考文献列表和主要试验作者的其他出版物,并联系了专家。

选择标准

我们纳入了由医疗保健专业人员为住院成年患者提供的药物审查的随机试验。我们排除了包括门诊和儿科患者的试验。

数据收集和分析

两名综述作者独立选择试验、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。我们联系了试验作者以澄清数据和相关未发表的数据。我们计算了二分类数据的风险比(RR)和连续数据的均数差(MD)或标准化均数差(SMD)(具有 95%置信区间(CI))。我们使用 GRADE(推荐、评估、制定和评估等级)方法评估证据的总体确定性。

主要结果

在本次更新的综述中,我们共纳入了 25 项试验(15076 名参与者),其中 15 项为新试验(11501 名参与者)。随访时间从 1 到 20 个月不等。我们发现,住院成人的药物审查可能对死亡率几乎没有影响(RR 0.96,95%CI 0.87 至 1.05;18 项试验,10108 名参与者;低确定性证据);可能降低医院再入院率(RR 0.93,95%CI 0.89 至 0.98;17 项试验,9561 名参与者;中等确定性证据);可能减少急诊就诊(RR 0.84,95%CI 0.68 至 1.03;8 项试验,3527 名参与者;低确定性证据),对健康相关生活质量的影响非常不确定(SMD 0.10,95%CI -0.10 至 0.30;4 项试验,392 名参与者;极低确定性证据)。

作者结论

住院成年患者的药物审查可能会降低医院再入院率,并可能减少急诊就诊。证据表明,药物审查可能对死亡率几乎没有影响,而对健康相关生活质量的影响则非常不确定。几乎所有试验都纳入了老年多药治疗患者,这限制了结果在该人群之外的推广。

相似文献

1
Medication review in hospitalised patients to reduce morbidity and mortality.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 23;1(1):CD008986. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008986.pub4.
2
Medication review in hospitalised patients to reduce morbidity and mortality.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 20;2(2):CD008986. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008986.pub3.
3
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
4
Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 26;11(11):CD013307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013307.pub3.
5
Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD013307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013307.pub2.
6
Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 4;10(10):CD003942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003942.pub3.
7
Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in people with cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 12;10(10):CD006911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub4.
8
Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;2(2):CD008469. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008469.pub3.
9
Systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19: Equity-related analyses and update on evidence.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD014963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014963.pub2.
10
Integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) strategy for children under five.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 22;2016(6):CD010123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010123.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Pathway to Healthier Aging or an Illusion? A Narrative Review on Deprescribing Protocols for the Elderly.
Sage Open Aging. 2025 Jun 9;11:30495334251345091. doi: 10.1177/30495334251345091. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Implementing physician-led medication reviews for patients with diabetes and severe mental disorder: A randomized controlled trial.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Sep;91(9):2543-2554. doi: 10.1002/bcp.70062. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
6
Geriatric patients' views on a pharmacist-led follow-up programme after discharge from hospital.
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2025 Mar 25;18:100597. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100597. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Reducing polypharmacy through deprescribing in the emergency department.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 7;104(10):e41590. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041590.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验