Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠治疗犬癫痫持续状态和难治性癫痫持续状态的比较

Propofol versus sodium thiopentone for the treatment of status epilepticus and refractory status epilepticus in dogs.

作者信息

Espiñeira I, Alzate D, Araos J, Pellegrino F, Tunesi M, Jensen M, Donati P A

机构信息

UCICOOP, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Small Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

N Z Vet J. 2023 May;71(3):128-132. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2023.2172089. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

Abstract

AIMS

To compare the effect on mortality and length of hospital stay of propofol with that of sodium thiopentone for the management of dogs with status epilepticus (SE) and refractory status epilepticus (RSE).

METHODS

In this cohort study, medical records of a veterinary referral clinic in Argentina were retrospectively searched for dogs that were hospitalised and required induction of therapeutic coma (TC) with either propofol or sodium thiopentone for the management of SE or RSE of any cause. A logistic regression model was performed to evaluate the association between the type of anaesthetic used and in-hospital mortality adjusting for the type of epilepsy (idiopathic, structural, or reactive). Kaplan-Meier estimated survival curves for the length of hospital stay by the type of anaesthetic drug were compared using the log-rank test (deaths were considered censored events). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios for time to hospital discharge, unadjusted and adjusted for type of epilepsy.

RESULTS

A total of 24 dogs with SE were included in the study: eight treated with propofol and 16 treated with sodium thiopentone. Four dogs treated with propofol (proportion = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.15-0.84), and eight treated with sodium thiopentone (proportion = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.50-0.74) died during hospitalisation. The median hospitalisation time was 43 (IQR 24-56) hours for dogs that were treated with propofol and 72 (IQR 64-96) hours for dogs that were treated with sodium thiopentone. There was no evidence of a difference in the median duration of TC in dogs treated with propofol (12 (IQR 8-24) hours) or with sodium thiopentone (12 (IQR 7.5-20) hours; p = 0.946). In the logistic regression model, no evidence of association between the anaesthetic protocol for the management of RSE and in-hospital mortality, adjusted for the type of epilepsy, was found (OR 1.09 (95% CI = 0.17-6.87); p = 0.925). Cox regression analysis revealed a difference in the time to hospital discharge, adjusted by the type of epilepsy, between treatment groups (HR = 0.05 (95% CI = 0.01-0.54); p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The time spent in hospital before discharge was longer in dogs with RSE treated with sodium thiopentone compared to those treated with propofol. However, as the sample size was very small, the results obtained in the present study should be analysed with caution. Further studies including a greater number of dogs are required.

摘要

目的

比较丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠对癫痫持续状态(SE)和难治性癫痫持续状态(RSE)犬的死亡率及住院时间的影响。

方法

在这项队列研究中,对阿根廷一家兽医转诊诊所的医疗记录进行回顾性检索,查找因任何原因的SE或RSE而住院并需要用丙泊酚或硫喷妥钠诱导治疗性昏迷(TC)的犬只。进行逻辑回归模型以评估所用麻醉剂类型与住院死亡率之间的关联,并对癫痫类型(特发性、结构性或反应性)进行校正。使用对数秩检验比较不同麻醉药物类型的犬只住院时间的Kaplan-Meier估计生存曲线(死亡被视为删失事件)。使用Cox比例风险回归来估计出院时间的风险比,未校正及校正癫痫类型。

结果

本研究共纳入24只患有SE的犬只:8只用丙泊酚治疗,16只用硫喷妥钠治疗。4只接受丙泊酚治疗的犬只(比例 = 0.50;95% CI = 0.15 - 0.84)和8只接受硫喷妥钠治疗的犬只(比例 = 0.50;95% CI = 0.50 - 0.74)在住院期间死亡。接受丙泊酚治疗的犬只的中位住院时间为43(IQR 24 - 56)小时,接受硫喷妥钠治疗的犬只为72(IQR 64 - 96)小时。没有证据表明接受丙泊酚治疗的犬只(12(IQR 8 - 24)小时)或硫喷妥钠治疗的犬只(12(IQR 7.5 - 20)小时;p = 0.946)的TC中位持续时间存在差异。在逻辑回归模型中,未发现校正癫痫类型后用于治疗RSE的麻醉方案与住院死亡率之间存在关联的证据(OR 1.09(95% CI = 0.17 - 6.87);p = 0.925)。Cox回归分析显示,校正癫痫类型后,治疗组之间出院时间存在差异(HR = 0.05(95% CI = 0.01 - 0.54);p = 0.013)。

结论及临床意义

与接受丙泊酚治疗的RSE犬相比,接受硫喷妥钠治疗的犬出院前住院时间更长。然而,由于样本量非常小,本研究获得的结果应谨慎分析。需要开展包括更多犬只的进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验