• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝动脉切除在远端胆管癌中的应用。

Hepatic artery resection in distal cholangiocarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 23;408(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02749-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-022-02749-5
PMID:36688973
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to elucidate the safety and oncological outcomes of surgery with hepatic artery resection (HAR) for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma who underwent curative intent surgery at Hiroshima University between March 2009 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Eligible patients were classified according to the presence or absence of HAR (HAR and non-HAR group), and clinicopathological features and disease-free survival rates were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Among the 60 patients analyzed, eight patients had received HAR, and the remaining 52 patients had not. The rate of portal vein resection, T stage, and the number of metastasized lymph nodes in the HAR group were significantly greater than those in the non-HAR group (p < 0.001, p = 0.00695, and p = 0.0480, respectively). Postoperative severe complication was confirmed in one patient, and there were no in-hospital deaths in the HAR group. Seven of 8 patients in the HAR group showed recurrence during follow-up, and of those, six patients showed early recurrence within 1 year postoperatively. The disease-free survival time in the HAR group was significantly shorter than that in the non-HAR group (median: 7.4 m vs. 34.2 m, respectively) (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis and HAR were significant risk factors for predicting the adverse disease-free survival time (hazard ratio (HR), 3.21; p = 0.0142; HR, 4.47; p = 0.0346, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma who underwent surgery with HAR tended to show early recurrences, although HAR could be performed safely.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在阐明肝动脉切除(HAR)手术治疗远端胆管癌的安全性和肿瘤学结果。

方法

回顾性分析 2009 年 3 月至 2021 年 1 月期间在广岛大学接受根治性手术治疗的远端胆管癌患者的临床资料。根据是否存在 HAR(HAR 组和非 HAR 组)对合格患者进行分类,并比较两组的临床病理特征和无病生存率。

结果

在分析的 60 例患者中,8 例接受了 HAR,其余 52 例未接受。HAR 组的门静脉切除率、T 分期和转移淋巴结数明显大于非 HAR 组(p<0.001、p=0.00695 和 p=0.0480)。1 例患者术后发生严重并发症,HAR 组无院内死亡。HAR 组 8 例患者中有 7 例在随访期间复发,其中 6 例在术后 1 年内出现早期复发。HAR 组的无病生存时间明显短于非 HAR 组(中位数:7.4 个月与 34.2 个月)(p<0.001)。多因素分析显示,淋巴结转移和 HAR 是预测不良无病生存时间的显著危险因素(风险比(HR),3.21;p=0.0142;HR,4.47;p=0.0346)。

结论

尽管 HAR 可以安全进行,但接受 HAR 手术治疗的远端胆管癌患者往往会出现早期复发。

相似文献

1
Hepatic artery resection in distal cholangiocarcinoma.肝动脉切除在远端胆管癌中的应用。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 23;408(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02749-5.
2
Left hepatectomy combined with hepatic artery resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.左半肝切除术联合肝动脉切除治疗肝门部胆管癌:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 Aug;32:167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.038. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
3
Long-term outcome and prognostic factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma involving the hepatic hilus versus hilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent resection: Should they be recognized as perihilar cholangiocarcinoma or differentiated?肝门部胆管癌累及肝门部与肝门部胆管癌根治性切除术后的长期预后和预后因素:是否应将其视为肝门周围胆管癌或加以区分?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;45(11):2173-2179. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
4
The impact of portal vein resection on outcomes for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 305 cases.门静脉切除对肝门部胆管癌预后的影响:305 例多机构分析。
Cancer. 2012 Oct 1;118(19):4737-47. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27492. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
5
[The safety and efficacy of combined hepatic artery resection in treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis].肝动脉联合切除治疗肝门部胆管癌的安全性和有效性:一项Meta分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 26;101(4):286-292. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.cn112137-20200619-01891.
6
Hepatectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an audit of 50 consecutive cases.肝切除术联合门静脉和肝动脉切除治疗高位肝门部胆管癌:50 例连续病例的回顾性分析。
Ann Surg. 2010 Jul;252(1):115-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e463a7.
7
Portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.肝门部胆管癌的门静脉切除术
Am Surg. 2006 Jul;72(7):599-604; discussion 604-5.
8
[Clinical application of combined hepatic artery resection and reconstruction in surgical treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma].肝动脉联合切除与重建在肝门部胆管癌手术治疗中的临床应用
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jan 1;56(1):41-46. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.01.010.
9
Hepatic Artery Resection for Bismuth Type III and IV Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Is Reconstruction Always Required?肝动脉切除治疗 Bismuth Ⅲ型和Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌:是否总是需要重建?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jul;22(7):1204-1212. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3711-3. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
10
Combined vascular resection in operative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does it work or not?肝门部胆管癌手术切除中的联合血管切除:是否有效?
Surgery. 2007 May;141(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.09.016. Epub 2007 Mar 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Long-Term Results of the Dutch Randomized PREOPANC Trial.可切除和边缘可切除胰腺癌的新辅助放化疗与 upfront 手术比较:荷兰随机 PREOPANC 试验的长期结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Apr 10;40(11):1220-1230. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02233. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
2
Hepatic artery resection without reconstruction in pancreatoduodenectomy.胰十二指肠切除术时不重建的肝动脉切除。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Sep;406(6):2081-2090. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02178-w. Epub 2021 May 1.
3
Arterial Resection in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: Effective After a Learning Curve.
胰腺癌手术中的动脉切除:度过学习曲线后效果显著。
Ann Surg. 2022 Apr 1;275(4):759-768. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004054.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary pancreas surgery with arterial resection.系统回顾和当代胰腺外科手术动脉切除的荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Nov;405(7):903-919. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01972-2. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer 2019 From the Japan Pancreas Society: A Synopsis.《2019 年日本胰腺学会胰腺癌临床实践指南概要》。
Pancreas. 2020 Mar;49(3):326-335. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001513.
6
Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study.卡培他滨对比观察用于可切除胆管癌(BILCAP):一项随机、对照、多中心、3 期研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):663-673. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30915-X. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
7
Oncological Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Gemcitabine Versus Upfront Surgery in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Phase 2/3 Trial.吉西他滨新辅助放化疗对比直接手术治疗边界可切除胰腺癌患者的肿瘤学获益:一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、多中心 2/3 期试验。
Ann Surg. 2018 Aug;268(2):215-222. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002705.
8
Predictors of Resectability and Survival in Patients With Borderline and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer who Underwent Neoadjuvant Treatment With FOLFIRINOX.FOLFIRINOX 新辅助治疗后可切除性和生存预测因素分析:交界性和局部进展期胰腺癌患者
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):733-740. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002600.
9
A comparative study of neoadjuvant treatment with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel versus surgery first for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.吉西他滨联合纳米白蛋白紫杉醇新辅助治疗与先行手术治疗胰腺腺癌的对比研究
Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec;26(4):402-410. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
10
Survival impact of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma with arterial contact.吉西他滨联合S-1新辅助化疗对伴有动脉接触的可切除边缘性胰腺癌患者生存的影响
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Jan;79(1):37-47. doi: 10.1007/s00280-016-3199-z. Epub 2016 Nov 22.