Department of Nutrition & Integrative Physiology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(5):600-612. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2172493. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
Hemorrhage is a leading cause of preventable battlefield and civilian trauma deaths. Ketamine, fentanyl, and morphine are recommended analgesics for use in the prehospital (i.e., field) setting to reduce pain. However, it is unknown whether any of these analgesics reduce hemorrhagic tolerance in humans. We tested the hypothesis that fentanyl (75 µg) and morphine (5 mg), but not ketamine (20 mg), would reduce tolerance to simulated hemorrhage in conscious humans. Each of the three analgesics was evaluated independently among different cohorts of healthy adults in a randomized, crossover (within drug/placebo comparison), placebo-controlled fashion using doses derived from the Tactical Combat Casualty Care Guidelines for Medical Personnel. One minute after an intravenous infusion of the analgesic or placebo (saline), we employed a pre-syncopal limited progressive lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) protocol to determine hemorrhagic tolerance. Hemorrhagic tolerance was quantified as a cumulative stress index (CSI), which is the sum of products of the LBNP and the duration (e.g., [40 mmHg x 3 min] + [50 mmHg x 3 min] …). Compared with ketamine ( = 0.002 result) and fentanyl ( = 0.02 result), morphine reduced the CSI (ketamine (n = 30): 99 [73-139], fentanyl (n = 28): 95 [68-130], morphine (n = 30): 62 [35-85]; values expressed as a % of the respective placebo trial's CSI; median [IQR]; Kruskal-Wallis test = 0.002). Morphine-induced reductions in tolerance to central hypovolemia were not well explained by a prediction model including biological sex, body mass, and age (R=0.05, = 0.74). These experimental data demonstrate that morphine reduces tolerance to simulated hemorrhage while fentanyl and ketamine do not affect tolerance. Thus, these laboratory-based data, captured via simulated hemorrhage, suggest that morphine should not be used for a hemorrhaging individual in the prehospital setting.
出血是战场上和民用创伤死亡的主要可预防原因。氯胺酮、芬太尼和吗啡被推荐用于院前(即现场)环境中的镇痛剂,以减轻疼痛。然而,目前尚不清楚这些镇痛剂是否能降低人类的出血耐受性。我们假设芬太尼(75μg)和吗啡(5mg),但不是氯胺酮(20mg),会降低清醒人类对模拟出血的耐受性。在一项随机、交叉(药物/安慰剂比较)、安慰剂对照的研究中,我们使用战术战斗伤员救治指南为医务人员推荐的剂量,分别在不同队列的健康成年人中独立评估了这三种镇痛剂。在静脉输注镇痛剂或安慰剂(生理盐水)1 分钟后,我们采用预晕厥有限渐进性下肢负压力(LBNP)方案来确定出血耐受性。出血耐受性通过累积应激指数(CSI)来量化,CSI 是 LBNP 和持续时间(例如,[40mmHg x 3 分钟] + [50mmHg x 3 分钟]...)的乘积之和。与氯胺酮( = 0.002)和芬太尼( = 0.02)相比,吗啡降低了 CSI(氯胺酮(n = 30):99 [73-139],芬太尼(n = 28):95 [68-130],吗啡(n = 30):62 [35-85];以各自安慰剂试验 CSI 的百分比表示;中位数 [IQR];Kruskal-Wallis 检验 = 0.002)。吗啡诱导的对中心性低血容量的耐受性降低不能很好地用包括生物性别、体重和年龄的预测模型来解释(R=0.05, = 0.74)。这些实验数据表明,吗啡降低了对模拟出血的耐受性,而芬太尼和氯胺酮则不影响耐受性。因此,这些基于实验室的模拟出血数据表明,吗啡不应在院前环境中用于出血个体。