Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Department of Applied Clinical Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
J Physiol. 2020 Dec;598(24):5661-5672. doi: 10.1113/JP280491. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
Haemorrhage is the leading cause of battlefield and civilian trauma deaths. Given that a haemorrhagic injury on the battlefield is almost always associated with pain, it is paramount that the administered pain medication does not disrupt the physiological mechanisms that are beneficial in defending against the haemorrhagic insult. Current guidelines from the US Army's Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) for the selection of pain medications administered to a haemorrhaging soldier are based upon limited scientific evidence, with the clear majority of supporting studies being conducted on anaesthetized animals. Specifically, the influence of low-dose ketamine, one of three analgesics employed in the pre-hospital setting by the US Army, on haemorrhagic tolerance in humans is unknown. For the first time in conscious males and females, the findings of the present study demonstrate that the administration of an analgesic dose of ketamine does not compromise tolerance to a simulated haemorrhagic insult. Increases in muscle sympathetic nerve activity during progressive lower-body negative pressure were not different between trials. Despite the lack of differences for muscle sympathetic nerve activity responses, mean blood pressure and heart rate were higher during moderate hypovolemia after ketamine vs. placebo administration.
Haemorrhage is the leading cause of battlefield and civilian trauma deaths. For a haemorrhaging soldier, there are several pain medications (e.g. ketamine) recommended for use in the prehospital, field setting. However, the data to support these recommendations are primarily limited to studies in animals. Therefore, it is unknown whether ketamine adversely affects physiological mechanisms responsible for maintenance of arterial blood pressure (BP) during haemorrhage in humans. In humans, ketamine has been demonstrated to raise resting BP, although it has not been studied with the concomitant central hypovolemia that occurs during haemorrhage. Thus, the present study aimed to test the hypothesis that ketamine does not impair haemorrhagic tolerance in humans. Thirty volunteers (15 females) participated in this double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A pre-syncopal limited progressive lower-body negative pressure (LBNP; a validated model for simulating haemorrhage) test was conducted following the administration of ketamine (20 mg) or placebo (saline). Tolerance was quantified as a cumulative stress index and compared between trials using a paired, two-tailed t test. We compared muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography), beat-to-beat BP (photoplethysmography) and heart rate (electrocardiogram) responses during the LBNP test using a mixed effects model (time [LBNP stage] × drug). Tolerance to the LBNP test was not different between trials (Ketamine: 635 ± 391 vs. Placebo: 652 ± 360 mmHg‧min, p = 0.77). Increases in MSNA burst frequency (time: P < 0.01, trial: p = 0.27, interaction: p = 0.39) during LBNP stages were no different between trials. Despite the lack of differences for MSNA responses, mean BP (time: P < 0.01, trial: P < 0.01, interaction: p = 0.01) and heart rate (time: P < 0.01, trial: P < 0.01, interaction: P < 0.01) were higher during moderate hypovolemia after ketamine vs. placebo administration (P < 0.05 for all, post hoc), but not at the end of LBNP. These data, which are the first to be obtained in conscious humans, demonstrate that the administration of low-dose ketamine does not impair tolerance to simulated haemorrhage or mechanisms responsible for maintenance of BP.
出血是战场和民用创伤死亡的主要原因。鉴于战场上的出血损伤几乎总是伴随着疼痛,至关重要的是,给予的止痛药物不会干扰有益于抵抗出血损伤的生理机制。美国陆军战术战场伤员护理委员会(CoTCCC)目前对选择用于出血士兵的止痛药物的指南是基于有限的科学证据,绝大多数支持性研究都是在麻醉动物上进行的。具体来说,低剂量氯胺酮(美国陆军在院前环境中使用的三种镇痛药之一)对人类出血耐受性的影响尚不清楚。在首次在清醒的男性和女性中,本研究的结果表明,给予镇痛剂量的氯胺酮不会损害对模拟出血损伤的耐受性。在逐渐降低的下半身负压期间,肌肉交感神经活动的增加在试验之间没有差异。尽管肌肉交感神经活动的反应没有差异,但在氯胺酮与安慰剂给药后中度低血容量时,平均血压和心率更高。
出血是战场和民用创伤死亡的主要原因。对于出血的士兵,有几种推荐用于院前、现场的止痛药物(例如氯胺酮)。然而,支持这些建议的数据主要限于动物研究。因此,尚不清楚氯胺酮是否会对维持出血期间动脉血压(BP)的生理机制产生不利影响。在人类中,氯胺酮已被证明会升高静息血压,尽管尚未在出血期间发生的伴随性中央性低血容量的情况下对其进行研究。因此,本研究旨在检验氯胺酮不会损害人类出血耐受性的假设。30 名志愿者(15 名女性)参加了这项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。在给予氯胺酮(20mg)或安慰剂(生理盐水)后,进行了预晕厥有限进展性下肢负压力(LBNP;模拟出血的有效模型)测试。通过累积应激指数来量化耐受性,并使用配对双侧 t 检验比较试验之间的差异。我们使用混合效应模型(时间[LBNP 阶段]×药物)比较了 LBNP 测试期间的肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA;微神经记录)、逐搏血压(光体积描记法)和心率(心电图)的反应。LBNP 测试的耐受性在试验之间没有差异(氯胺酮:635±391 与安慰剂:652±360mmHg‧min,p=0.77)。在 LBNP 阶段,MSNA 爆发频率的增加(时间:P<0.01,试验:p=0.27,交互作用:p=0.39)在试验之间没有差异。尽管 MSNA 反应没有差异,但平均血压(时间:P<0.01,试验:P<0.01,交互作用:p=0.01)和心率(时间:P<0.01,试验:P<0.01,交互作用:P<0.01)在氯胺酮与安慰剂给药后中度低血容量时更高(所有 P<0.05,事后检验),但在 LBNP 结束时没有更高。这些数据是首次在清醒人类中获得的,表明给予低剂量氯胺酮不会损害对模拟出血的耐受性或维持血压的机制。