Department of Psychology.
Department of Psychiatry and Addiction Center.
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2023 Jan;132(1):51-62. doi: 10.1037/abn0000791.
Socioeconomic disadvantage may be a significant risk factor for disordered eating, particularly for individuals with underlying genetic risk. However, little to nothing is known about the impact of disadvantage on disordered eating in boys during the critical developmental risk period. Crucially, risk models developed for girls may not necessarily apply to boys, as boys show different developmental patterns of disordered eating risk (i.e., earlier activation of genetic influences during adrenarche, an early stage of puberty). This is the first study to examine phenotypic and Genotype × Environment (G × E) effects of disadvantage in boys. Analyses examined 3,484 male twins ages 8-17 ( = 12.27, SD = 2.96) from the Michigan State University Twin Registry. Disordered eating (e.g., body dissatisfaction, binge eating) was measured using the parent-report Michigan Twins Project Eating Disorder Survey. Neighborhood disadvantage was measured using a census-tract level Area Deprivation Index, and family socioeconomic status was determined from parental income and education. Adrenarche status was determined using multiple indicators, including age and Pubertal Development Scale scores. G × E models suggested that genetic influences on disordered eating were activated earlier for boys experiencing familial or neighborhood disadvantage, with substantial genetic influences in early adrenarche, when genetic influences were low in more advantaged boys. Phenotypically, both neighborhood and familial disadvantage were associated with greater disordered eating for boys in late adrenarche, which could indicate a lasting impact of earlier activation of genetic influences on later risk. Results highlight disadvantage as a novel risk factor for disordered eating in boys, particularly those with genetic vulnerabilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
社会经济劣势可能是饮食失调的一个重要风险因素,尤其是对于那些存在潜在遗传风险的人。然而,对于在关键发育风险期,劣势对男孩饮食失调的影响知之甚少。至关重要的是,为女孩开发的风险模型不一定适用于男孩,因为男孩表现出不同的饮食失调风险发展模式(即,在青春期早期的肾上腺功能亢进期间,遗传影响更早地被激活)。这是第一项研究检查劣势对男孩表型和基因型与环境(G × E)影响的研究。分析中检查了来自密歇根州立大学双胞胎登记处的 3484 名 8-17 岁的男性双胞胎(= 12.27,SD = 2.96)。使用父母报告的密歇根双胞胎项目饮食障碍调查来衡量饮食失调(例如,身体不满,暴食)。使用人口普查区层面的区域剥夺指数来衡量邻里劣势,而家庭社会经济地位则根据父母的收入和教育程度来确定。肾上腺功能亢进的状态是通过多种指标来确定的,包括年龄和青春期发育量表评分。G × E 模型表明,对于经历家庭或邻里劣势的男孩,遗传对饮食失调的影响更早被激活,在早期肾上腺功能亢进时具有较大的遗传影响,而在处于更有利地位的男孩中,遗传影响较低。表型上,邻里和家庭劣势都与后期肾上腺功能亢进的男孩的饮食失调问题更严重有关,这可能表明遗传影响的早期激活对后期风险有持久影响。结果突出了劣势是男孩饮食失调的一个新的风险因素,特别是对于那些具有遗传脆弱性的男孩。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。