Mikhail Megan E, Cordell Kate Duggento, Downey Amanda E, Snowden Lonnie R, Accurso Erin C
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2025 Jan;58(1):181-192. doi: 10.1002/eat.24301. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
Although eating disorders (EDs) affect youth from all socioeconomic backgrounds, little is known about the treatment experiences of under-resourced youth with EDs. To address this gap, we examined patterns of outpatient and inpatient service utilization among publicly-insured youth with EDs in California and potential disparities for youth with additional marginalized identities.
Participants were identified from the full sample of California Medicaid/Medi-Cal beneficiaries aged 7-18 with ≥ 1 service episode between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016. Claims data were extracted for youth with a full year of claims after the first known ED diagnosis (N = 3311) to analyze outpatient mental health, outpatient medical/physical, inpatient mental health, and inpatient medical/physical service use across ED diagnosis and demographic characteristics (sex, age, race/ethnicity, and preferred language).
Outpatient individual and family therapy service utilization was low across ED diagnoses (4-7 individual therapy sessions and ≈5 family therapy sessions annually). Conversely, hospitalization rates were high, particularly among youth with anorexia nervosa (27.8%) and bulimia nervosa (30.0%). Youth with other specified feeding or ED had high medical service utilization, with more days of outpatient medical care and greater odds of medical hospitalization than youth with all other diagnoses. Latinx youth, Black youth, and boys tended to receive fewer services after accounting for diagnosis, with disparities particularly pronounced for Latinx youth.
Publicly-insured youth with EDs in California experience high hospitalization rates but receive limited outpatient therapy. Additional research is needed to identify possible unmet needs and factors contributing to treatment disparities among these youth.
尽管饮食失调(EDs)影响着来自各种社会经济背景的青少年,但对于资源不足的患有饮食失调症的青少年的治疗经历却知之甚少。为了填补这一空白,我们研究了加利福尼亚州有公共保险的患有饮食失调症的青少年的门诊和住院服务利用模式,以及具有其他边缘化身份的青少年可能存在的差异。
从2014年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间年龄在7 - 18岁、有≥1次服务记录的加利福尼亚医疗补助/医保受益人的完整样本中确定参与者。提取首次已知饮食失调诊断后有一整年索赔记录的青少年的索赔数据(N = 3311),以分析不同饮食失调诊断以及人口统计学特征(性别、年龄、种族/族裔和首选语言)下的门诊心理健康、门诊医疗/身体、住院心理健康和住院医疗/身体服务使用情况。
在所有饮食失调诊断中,门诊个体和家庭治疗服务的利用率都很低(每年4 - 7次个体治疗疗程和约5次家庭治疗疗程)。相反,住院率很高,尤其是神经性厌食症患者(27.8%)和神经性贪食症患者(30.0%)。患有其他特定喂养或饮食失调症的青少年医疗服务利用率很高,与所有其他诊断的青少年相比,门诊医疗护理天数更多,住院治疗的几率也更大。在考虑诊断因素后,拉丁裔青少年、黑人青少年和男孩往往获得的服务较少,拉丁裔青少年的差异尤为明显。
加利福尼亚州有公共保险的患有饮食失调症的青少年住院率很高,但接受的门诊治疗有限。需要进一步研究以确定这些青少年可能未满足的需求以及导致治疗差异的因素。