• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种被动采样器(o-DGT 和 POCIS)对 109 种亲水性新兴和优先有机化合物的校准比较。

Calibration comparison between two passive samplers -o-DGT and POCIS- for 109 hydrophilic emerging and priority organic compounds.

机构信息

Inrae, UR EABX, 50 avenue de Verdun, 33612 Cestas, France.

Inrae, UR EABX, 50 avenue de Verdun, 33612 Cestas, France.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2023 Apr 15;869:161720. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161720. Epub 2023 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161720
PMID:36690093
Abstract

The Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS) is the most widely used passive sampler for hydrophilic compounds, but unsuitable for certain ionic organic contaminants. The Diffusive Gradient in Thin-Film technique (o-DGT) has shown positive results for both ionic and hydrophilic compounds. However, a calibration step is now needed to evaluate kinetic constant of accumulation for a wide range of molecules. In this study, o-DGT and POCIS were compared for the sampling of three families of micropollutants of potential risk to aquatic environments: 53 pesticides, 36 pharmaceuticals and 20 hormones. A calibration experiment was conducted to compare the kinetic models and constants from a scientific and practical perspective. The results are discussed in a single table that summarizes the performance of both passive samplers for the 109 compounds of interest. The advantage of o-DGT is that it allows linear accumulation for 72 compounds versus only 33 with POCIS. The mean times to equilibrium obtained with o-DGT are higher than those obtained with POCIS. These results confirm that the presence of a diffusion gel delays the achievement of equilibrium during compound accumulation. Therefore, o-DGT can be considered for situations where POCIS cannot be used due to non-linear accumulation over a typical 14-day deployment period. However, overall sampling rates and mass transfer coefficients also appear reduced with o-DGT, which is explained by the smaller exchange surface area, as well as the consideration of an additional diffusive layer in this device. This paper also showed that the most appropriate membrane to sample polar compounds with o-DGT was a polyethersulfone polymer with a pore size of 5 μm.

摘要

极性有机化学整合采样器(POCIS)是最广泛用于亲水性化合物的被动采样器,但不适合某些离子有机污染物。薄膜扩散梯度技术(o-DGT)已被证明对离子和亲水性化合物都有积极的效果。然而,现在需要进行校准步骤来评估广泛分子的积累动力学常数。在这项研究中,o-DGT 和 POCIS 被用于采样三种对水生环境有潜在风险的微污染物家族:53 种农药、36 种药物和 20 种激素。进行了校准实验,从科学和实践的角度比较了动力学模型和常数。结果在一个表格中进行了讨论,该表格总结了两种被动采样器对 109 种感兴趣化合物的性能。o-DGT 的优势在于它允许 72 种化合物线性积累,而 POCIS 只能允许 33 种化合物线性积累。用 o-DGT 获得的平衡时间平均值高于用 POCIS 获得的平衡时间平均值。这些结果证实,扩散凝胶的存在会在化合物积累过程中延迟达到平衡。因此,o-DGT 可用于由于在典型的 14 天部署期间非线性积累而无法使用 POCIS 的情况。然而,o-DGT 的总体采样速率和质量传递系数似乎也降低了,这是由于其交换表面积较小,以及在该装置中考虑了额外的扩散层所致。本文还表明,o-DGT 最适合采样极性化合物的膜是聚醚砜聚合物,其孔径为 5μm。

相似文献

1
Calibration comparison between two passive samplers -o-DGT and POCIS- for 109 hydrophilic emerging and priority organic compounds.两种被动采样器(o-DGT 和 POCIS)对 109 种亲水性新兴和优先有机化合物的校准比较。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Apr 15;869:161720. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161720. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
2
Interest of a new large diffusive gradients in thin films (L-DGT) for organic compounds monitoring: On-field comparison with conventional passive samplers.新型薄膜扩散梯度技术(L-DGT)用于有机化合物监测的研究:与传统被动采样器的现场比较
Environ Pollut. 2023 Apr 15;323:121257. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121257. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
3
Limitation of flow effect on passive sampling accuracy using POCIS with the PRC approach or o-DGT: A pilot-scale evaluation for pharmaceutical compounds.限制流动效应对使用 PRC 方法或 o-DGT 的 POCIS 进行被动采样准确性的影响:药物化合物的中试评估。
Chemosphere. 2019 May;222:628-636. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.181. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
4
Performance of the organic-diffusive gradients in thin-films passive sampler for measurement of target and suspect wastewater contaminants.有机扩散梯度薄膜被动采样器用于测量目标和疑似废水污染物的性能。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Jun;261:114092. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114092. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
5
Field Evaluation and in Situ Stress Testing of the Organic-Diffusive Gradients in Thin-Films Passive Sampler.有机扩散薄膜采样器的野外评估和原地应力测试。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Nov 6;52(21):12573-12582. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b03622. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
6
Performance comparison of three passive samplers for monitoring of polar organic contaminants in treated municipal wastewater.三种被动式采样器用于监测经处理的城市废水中极性有机污染物的性能比较
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 15;908:168153. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168153. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
7
Adaptation of diffusive gradients in thin films technique to sample organic pollutants in the environment: An overview of o-DGT passive samplers.扩散梯度薄膜技术在环境中有机污染物采样中的应用:o-DGT 被动采样器概述。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 25;693:133537. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.343. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
8
Development and Calibration of an Organic-Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films Aquatic Passive Sampler for a Diverse Suite of Polar Organic Contaminants.发展和校准一种用于多种极性有机污染物的有机-扩散薄膜在薄水体被动采样器。
Anal Chem. 2016 Nov 1;88(21):10583-10591. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02749. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
9
Evaluation of polar organic chemical integrative and hollow fibre samplers for the determination of a wide variety of organic polar compounds in seawater.评价用于测定海水中多种有机极性化合物的极性有机化学综合采样器和中空纤维采样器。
Talanta. 2018 Aug 1;185:469-476. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.03.103. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
10
Pharmaceuticals and pesticides archived on polar passive sampling devices can be stable for up to 6 years.保存在极地被动采样器中的药品和农药最多可稳定 6 年。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 Mar;37(3):762-767. doi: 10.1002/etc.4012. Epub 2017 Dec 29.