University of Limoges, PEIRENE URA IRSTEA, Equipe DIQeau, 123 Avenue Albert Thomas, 87060, Limoges Cedex, France.
University of Limoges, PEIRENE URA IRSTEA, Equipe DIQeau, 123 Avenue Albert Thomas, 87060, Limoges Cedex, France.
Chemosphere. 2019 May;222:628-636. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.181. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
Flow velocity is known to alter passive sampling accuracy. We investigated the POCIS (Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Sampler) with PRC (Performance Reference Compounds) approach and Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films samplers (o-DGT) to limit the effect of flow on the quantification accuracy of ten model pharmaceuticals compounds (0.16 ≤ log K ≤ 4.51). POCIS and o-DGT samplers were exposed for seven days in controlled pilot-scale (hundreds of liters) experiments under quiescent or flowing (2 < V < 18 cm s) conditions. Under flowing conditions, both POCIS-PRC and o-DGT efficiently limited the flow effect and led, in most cases, to biases within analytical uncertainty (20%). Under quiescent conditions, o-DGT performed accurately (bias < 30% for most compounds) whereas the PRC approach was unsuitable to improve upon the accuracy of POCIS (PRC was unable to desorb). Therefore, both approaches are helpful in limiting the effects of flow on accuracy, but only o-DGT is efficient in quiescent conditions. However, o-DGT currently suffers from poorer sensitivity compared to POCIS, but the future development of o-DGT devices with wider windows could overcome this limitation.
流速已知会改变被动采样的准确性。我们研究了 POCIS(极性有机化学综合采样器)和 PRC(性能参考化合物)方法以及 o-DGT(薄膜扩散梯度采样器),以限制流速对十种模型药物化合物(0.16≤log K≤4.51)定量准确性的影响。在静止或流动(2<V<18cm/s)条件下,在受控中试规模(数百升)实验中,POCIS 和 o-DGT 采样器暴露了七天。在流动条件下,POCIS-PRC 和 o-DGT 都有效地限制了流速的影响,在大多数情况下,将偏差控制在分析不确定性(20%)范围内。在静止条件下,o-DGT 表现出较高的准确性(对于大多数化合物,偏差<30%),而 PRC 方法不适合提高 POCIS 的准确性(PRC 无法解吸)。因此,这两种方法都有助于限制流速对准确性的影响,但只有 o-DGT 在静止条件下有效。然而,与 POCIS 相比,o-DGT 目前的灵敏度较差,但未来开发具有更宽窗口的 o-DGT 设备可能会克服这一限制。