• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医生在计划生育服务中对生殖胁迫筛查的看法和经验。

Clinician views and experiences with reproductive coercion screening in a family planning service.

作者信息

Cheng Yan, Rogers Claire, Boerma Clare J, Botfield Jessica R, Estoesta Jane

机构信息

Family Planning NSW, 8 Holker Street, Newington, NSW 2127, Australia.

出版信息

Sex Health. 2023 Feb;20(1):71-79. doi: 10.1071/SH22143.

DOI:10.1071/SH22143
PMID:36690449
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reproductive coercion refers to behaviour that interferes with a person's reproductive autonomy, such as contraceptive sabotage, pregnancy coercion, controlling a pregnancy outcome or forced sterilisation. Routine screening for reproductive coercion, together with clinician education, was implemented at a family planning service in New South Wales, Australia, in December 2018. A study was undertaken to explore the views and experiences of clinicians in undertaking reproductive coercion screening at this service.

METHODS

Clinicians were invited to complete an online survey and interview to discuss their understanding of reproductive coercion and their views and experiences of undertaking reproductive coercion screening. Descriptive and thematic content analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Clinicians deemed reproductive coercion screening to be relevant and important in family planning services. Key barriers to reproductive coercion screening and responding to disclosures included time constraints and limited appropriate referral pathways. Ongoing education and training with resources such as a decision-support tool on reproductive coercion screening and management, as well as effective multi-disciplinary collaboration, were identified as strategies to improve the screening program.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from our study highlight that clinicians' perceived reproductive coercion screening as a relevant and important component of sexual and reproductive healthcare. Ongoing reproductive coercion education, training and support would ensure the competency and confidence of clinicians undertaking screening. Identifying appropriate referral pathways with multi-disciplinary collaboration (involving clinicians, social workers, support workers and psychologists) would support clinicians in undertaking screening and responding to disclosures of reproductive coercion in Australian health care settings which provide family planning and sexual and reproductive health services.

摘要

背景

生殖胁迫是指干扰个人生殖自主权的行为,如破坏避孕措施、强迫怀孕、控制妊娠结局或强制绝育。2018年12月,澳大利亚新南威尔士州的一家计划生育服务机构实施了生殖胁迫的常规筛查以及临床医生教育。开展了一项研究,以探讨临床医生在该服务机构进行生殖胁迫筛查的观点和经验。

方法

邀请临床医生完成一项在线调查和访谈,以讨论他们对生殖胁迫的理解以及他们进行生殖胁迫筛查的观点和经验。进行了描述性和主题性内容分析。

结果

临床医生认为生殖胁迫筛查在计划生育服务中具有相关性和重要性。生殖胁迫筛查及对披露情况作出回应的主要障碍包括时间限制和适当的转诊途径有限。确定将持续开展教育和培训,并提供诸如生殖胁迫筛查和管理决策支持工具等资源,以及有效的多学科协作,作为改进筛查项目的策略。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,临床医生将生殖胁迫筛查视为性与生殖健康保健的一个相关且重要的组成部分。持续的生殖胁迫教育、培训和支持将确保进行筛查的临床医生具备能力和信心。确定与多学科协作(包括临床医生、社会工作者、支持人员和心理学家)的适当转诊途径,将有助于临床医生在澳大利亚提供计划生育及性与生殖健康服务的医疗环境中进行筛查并对生殖胁迫的披露情况作出回应。

相似文献

1
Clinician views and experiences with reproductive coercion screening in a family planning service.临床医生在计划生育服务中对生殖胁迫筛查的看法和经验。
Sex Health. 2023 Feb;20(1):71-79. doi: 10.1071/SH22143.
2
Barriers to responding to reproductive coercion and abuse among women presenting to Australian primary care.澳大利亚初级医疗保健机构中,女性应对生殖胁迫和虐待行为时面临的障碍。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 4;21(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06420-5.
3
Reproductive coercion and abuse in Australia: what do we need to know?澳大利亚的生殖胁迫和虐待:我们需要了解什么?
Sex Health. 2021 Nov;18(5):436-440. doi: 10.1071/SH21116.
4
Reproductive coercion and abuse among pregnancy counselling clients in Australia: trends and directions.澳大利亚妊娠咨询客户中的生殖胁迫和虐待:趋势和方向。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jul 30;19(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01479-7.
5
Outcomes of routine screening for reproductive coercion in a family planning service.计划生育服务中常规筛查生殖强迫的结果。
Sex Health. 2021 Nov;18(5):349-357. doi: 10.1071/SH21079.
6
Cluster randomized controlled trial protocol: addressing reproductive coercion in health settings (ARCHES).整群随机对照试验方案:在卫生环境中应对生殖胁迫(ARCHES)
BMC Womens Health. 2015 Aug 6;15:57. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0216-z.
7
Experiences of Reproductive Coercion in Queensland Women.昆士兰州女性的生殖强迫经历。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Mar;37(5-6):NP2823-NP2843. doi: 10.1177/0886260519846851. Epub 2019 May 5.
8
Women's and girls' experiences of reproductive coercion and opportunities for intervention in family planning clinics in Nairobi, Kenya: a qualitative study.肯尼亚内罗毕计划生育诊所中女性和女孩的生殖强迫经历和干预机会:一项定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 17;17(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00942-7.
9
Coerced Choice: Resigned Contraceptive Usership Among Individuals Affected by Reproductive Coercion.被迫的选择:受生殖强迫影响的个体中的无奈避孕使用。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Sep;67(5):593-597. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13396. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
10
An exploration of perceived contraceptive coercion at the time of abortion.堕胎时感知到的避孕强制行为探究。
Contraception. 2018 Apr;97(4):329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 15.