• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计划生育服务中常规筛查生殖强迫的结果。

Outcomes of routine screening for reproductive coercion in a family planning service.

机构信息

Family Planning NSW, 328-336 Liverpool Road, Ashfield, NSW 2131, Australia.

Family Planning NSW, 328-336 Liverpool Road, Ashfield, NSW 2131, Australia; and The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Sex Health. 2021 Nov;18(5):349-357. doi: 10.1071/SH21079.

DOI:10.1071/SH21079
PMID:34606741
Abstract

Background Reproductive coercion (RC) occurs when a person's autonomous decision-making regarding reproductive health is compromised by another. RC screening, that is, the use of routine, non-invasive screening questions asked of service users/clients, is one strategy that can be used to assess for RC. Routine screening for RC was implemented within Family Planning NSW clinical consultations in December 2018. A cross-sectional study was undertaken to review the outcomes of screening to better understand the situation of RC among women accessing family planning services. Methods A retrospective review of clinical consultation data of eligible women attending Family Planning NSW clinics in 2019 was undertaken. Descriptive analysis was conducted and modified Poisson regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios and assess associations between binary outcomes and client characteristics. Results Of 7943 women eligible for RC screening, 5497 were screened (69%) and 127 women (2.3%) disclosed RC. RC was more likely to be disclosed among clients who were unemployed, had a disability or had more than one visit within 1 year. Conclusions Sexual and reproductive health clinicians, in particular, are well placed to conduct RC screening. However, they must have adequate training and access to resources to implement screening and respond to women who disclose RC.

摘要

背景

生殖胁迫(RC)是指当一个人在生殖健康方面的自主决策受到他人影响时发生的情况。生殖胁迫筛查,即对服务使用者/客户进行常规、非侵入性的筛查问题询问,是一种可用于评估 RC 的策略。2018 年 12 月,新南威尔士州计划生育在临床咨询中常规开展 RC 筛查。本研究开展了一项横断面研究,以审查筛查结果,从而更好地了解接受计划生育服务的妇女中 RC 的情况。

方法

对 2019 年在新南威尔士州计划生育诊所就诊的符合条件的女性的临床咨询数据进行回顾性审查。进行描述性分析,并使用修正泊松回归估计患病率比,并评估二项式结局与客户特征之间的关联。

结果

在 7943 名有资格接受 RC 筛查的女性中,有 5497 名接受了筛查(69%),有 127 名女性(2.3%)透露了 RC。在失业、残疾或在 1 年内有多次就诊的客户中,RC 更有可能被披露。

结论

性健康和生殖健康临床医生特别适合进行 RC 筛查。然而,他们必须接受充分的培训,并获得资源来实施筛查和回应透露 RC 的女性。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of routine screening for reproductive coercion in a family planning service.计划生育服务中常规筛查生殖强迫的结果。
Sex Health. 2021 Nov;18(5):349-357. doi: 10.1071/SH21079.
2
Cluster randomized controlled trial protocol: addressing reproductive coercion in health settings (ARCHES).整群随机对照试验方案:在卫生环境中应对生殖胁迫(ARCHES)
BMC Womens Health. 2015 Aug 6;15:57. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0216-z.
3
Reproductive Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence, and Unintended Pregnancy Among Latina Women.生育胁迫、亲密伴侣暴力与拉美裔女性意外怀孕。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Feb;37(3-4):1604-1636. doi: 10.1177/0886260520922363. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
4
Experiences of Reproductive Coercion Among Latina Women and Strategies for Minimizing Harm: "The Path Makes Us Strong".拉丁裔女性的生殖胁迫经历及减少伤害的策略:“道路使我们强大”。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Mar;65(2):248-256. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13061. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
5
Experience of domestic violence routine screening in Family Planning NSW clinics.新南威尔士州计划生育诊所进行家庭暴力常规筛查的经验。
Sex Health. 2017 Apr;14(2):155-163. doi: 10.1071/SH16143.
6
Recent reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy among female family planning clients.最近在女性计划生育服务对象中出现的生殖强迫和意外怀孕问题。
Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
7
Women's and girls' experiences of reproductive coercion and opportunities for intervention in family planning clinics in Nairobi, Kenya: a qualitative study.肯尼亚内罗毕计划生育诊所中女性和女孩的生殖强迫经历和干预机会:一项定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 17;17(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00942-7.
8
Implementing Trauma-Informed Partner Violence Assessment in Family Planning Clinics.在计划生育诊所实施创伤知情伴侣暴力评估
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Sep;26(9):957-965. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6093. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
Relationships of Reproductive Coercion and Intimate Partner Violence to Unintended Pregnancy.生殖胁迫及亲密伴侣暴力与意外怀孕的关系
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2019 Jan;48(1):50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
10
Training reproductive health providers to talk about intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion: an exploratory study.培训生殖健康服务提供者谈论亲密伴侣暴力和生殖胁迫:一项探索性研究。
Health Educ Res. 2018 Apr 1;33(2):175-185. doi: 10.1093/her/cyy007.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the Impact of Reproductive Coercion and Intimate Partner Violence on Psychological and Sexual Wellbeing.探究生殖胁迫和亲密伴侣暴力对心理及性健康的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2025 Feb;40(3-4):726-755. doi: 10.1177/08862605241253026. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
Reproductive Coercion and Abuse: The Potential Protective Scope of Existing Family Violence Legislation in Australia.生殖胁迫与虐待:澳大利亚现行家庭暴力立法的潜在保护范围
Violence Gend. 2024 Mar 1;11(1):14-21. doi: 10.1089/vio.2023.0011. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
Future directions for reproductive coercion and abuse research.
生殖胁迫和虐待研究的未来方向。
Reprod Health. 2023 Jan 2;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01550-3.