Suppr超能文献

荷兰癌症研究所保乳手术后即刻或延迟肿瘤整形手术:251例队列研究

Immediate or delayed oncoplastic surgery after breast conserving surgery at the Netherlands Cancer Institute: a cohort study of 251 cases.

作者信息

van Loevezijn Ariane A, Geluk Charissa S, van den Berg Marieke J, van Werkhoven Erik D, Vrancken Peeters Marie-Jeanne T F D, van Duijnhoven Frederieke H, Hoornweg Marije J

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Apr;198(2):295-307. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06841-8. Epub 2023 Jan 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) after breast conserving surgery is preferably performed during the same operation. Offering delayed OPS instead of mastectomy to patients with a high risk of tumor-positive margins allows breast conservation with the option of margin re-excision during OPS, without having to dismantle the reconstruction. We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes after immediate and delayed OPS.

METHODS

We included early-stage breast cancer patients who underwent OPS at the Netherlands Cancer Institute between 2016 and 2019. Patients were selected for delayed OPS after multidisciplinary consultation if the risk of tumor-positive margins with immediate OPS was considered significant (> 30%). Groups were compared on baseline characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 242 patients with 251 OPS, 130 (52%) OPS had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Immediate OPS was performed in 176 (70%) cases and delayed OPS in 76 (30%). Selection for delayed OPS was associated with tumor size (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04), ILC (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.10-6.20), DCIS (OR 3.45, 95% CI 1.42-8.34) and bra size (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.94). Delayed and immediate OPS differed in tissue weight (54 vs. 67 g, p = 0.034), tissue replacement (51% vs. 26%, p < .001) and tumor-positive margins (66% vs. 18%, p < .001). Re-excision was performed in 48 (63%) delayed OPS and in 11 (6%) immediate OPS. Groups did not differ in complications (21% vs. 18%, p = 0.333). Breast conservation after immediate and delayed OPS was 98% and 93%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Performing delayed OPS in selected cases facilitated simultaneous margin re-excision without increasing complications, and resulted in an excellent breast conservation rate.

摘要

目的

保乳手术后的肿瘤整形手术(OPS)最好在同一次手术中进行。对于切缘肿瘤阳性风险高的患者,提供延迟OPS而非乳房切除术可实现保乳,且可在OPS期间选择再次切除切缘,而无需拆除重建。我们旨在评估即刻和延迟OPS后的手术效果。

方法

我们纳入了2016年至2019年在荷兰癌症研究所接受OPS的早期乳腺癌患者。如果即刻OPS切缘肿瘤阳性风险被认为较高(>30%),则在多学科会诊后选择延迟OPS。比较两组的基线特征和短期手术效果。

结果

在242例接受251次OPS的患者中,130例(52%)OPS接受了新辅助化疗。176例(70%)进行了即刻OPS,76例(30%)进行了延迟OPS。延迟OPS的选择与肿瘤大小(OR 1.03,95%CI 1.01 - 1.04)、小叶原位癌(ILC,OR 2.61,95%CI 1.10 - 6.20)、导管原位癌(DCIS,OR 3.45,95%CI 1.42 - 8.34)和胸罩尺寸(OR 0.76,95%CI 0.62 - 0.94)有关。延迟OPS和即刻OPS在组织重量(54对67g,p = 0.034)、组织置换(51%对26%,p < 0.001)和切缘肿瘤阳性(66%对18%,p < 0.001)方面存在差异。48例(63%)延迟OPS和11例(6%)即刻OPS进行了再次切除。两组在并发症方面无差异(21%对18%,p = 0.333)。即刻和延迟OPS后的保乳率分别为98%和93%。

结论

在选定病例中进行延迟OPS有助于同时进行切缘再次切除,且不增加并发症,并导致了优异的保乳率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验