Suppr超能文献

内镜下全层切除术与套扎辅助内镜下全层切除术治疗源于固有肌层的直径≤1.5cm 胃黏膜下小肿瘤的对比研究。

Comparison of endoscopic full-thickness resection and ligation-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection for small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric subepithelial tumors originating from muscularis propria.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Hunan International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Artificial Intelligence Computer Aided Diagnosis and Treatment for Digestive Disease (2020CB1004), Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3796-3806. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09881-3. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of small gastric subepithelial tumors originating from muscularis propria (SET-MPs), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has been an effective procedure and ligation-assisted EFTR (EFTR-L) seems a feasible and promising operation. We aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of EFTR-L and EFTR to evaluate effect and safety of either method in the treatment of small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric SET-MPs.

METHODS

Between January 2018 to May 2022, we retrospectively enrolled a total of 119 patients with gastric SET-MPs treated by EFTR-L (79 patients) or EFTR (40 patients) at Xiangya Hospital Central South University. Clinical characteristics, operation efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and operation cost were compared between the 2 groups. Univariate and multiple logistic and linear regressions were applied to analyze the therapeutic outcomes of the procedure, and covariates were adjusted in the multiple analysis.

RESULTS

The operation time of EFTR-L group (16.34 ± 5.75 min) was significantly shorter than EFTR group (51.23 ± 21.21 min, P < 0.001), and the difference remained significant after adjusting the covariates (adjusted mean difference, 30.56; 95% confidence interval, 25.65-35.47; P < 0.001). The operation cost of EFTR-L group was lower than EFTR group (1268.52 ± 457.22 vs 1643.18 ± 295.08 $; P < 0.001). The complete resection rate of the EFTR-L group was 98.72% and of the EFTR group 100%. The incidence of abdominal pain in the EFTR-L group (5.06%) was lower than in the EFTR group (27.50%, P = 0.008). A patient in the EFTR group underwent severe pneumoperitoneum and received abdominocentesis during operation. One case of peritonitis occurred in the EFTR-L group but recovered from intensified antibiotic therapy. No delayed blood or perforation occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to EFTR, EFTR-L might be a feasible procedure for small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric SET-MPs due to the acceptable efficacy, shorter operation time, and lower cost.

摘要

背景

对于起源于固有肌层的小胃黏膜下肿瘤(SET-MPs),内镜全层切除术(EFTR)是一种有效的治疗方法,而结扎辅助 EFTR(EFTR-L)似乎是一种可行且有前途的手术。我们旨在比较 EFTR-L 和 EFTR 的治疗效果,以评估这两种方法在治疗直径≤1.5cm 的小胃 SET-MPs 中的安全性和有效性。

方法

2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 5 月,我们回顾性地纳入了在中南大学湘雅医院接受 EFTR-L(79 例)或 EFTR(40 例)治疗的 119 例胃 SET-MPs 患者。比较两组患者的临床特征、手术效果、不良事件(AE)和手术费用。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归及线性回归分析该手术的治疗效果,并对多因素分析中的混杂因素进行调整。

结果

EFTR-L 组的手术时间(16.34±5.75min)明显短于 EFTR 组(51.23±21.21min,P<0.001),调整混杂因素后差异仍有统计学意义(校正均数差值,30.56;95%置信区间,25.65-35.47;P<0.001)。EFTR-L 组的手术费用(1268.52±457.22 美元)明显低于 EFTR 组(1643.18±295.08 美元;P<0.001)。EFTR-L 组的完全切除率为 98.72%,EFTR 组为 100%。EFTR-L 组腹痛发生率(5.06%)低于 EFTR 组(27.50%,P=0.008)。EFTR 组 1 例患者术中发生严重气腹,行腹腔穿刺术。EFTR-L 组 1 例患者发生腹膜炎,经加强抗生素治疗后恢复。无迟发性出血或穿孔发生。

结论

与 EFTR 相比,EFTR-L 可能是一种治疗直径≤1.5cm 的小胃 SET-MPs 的可行方法,因为其具有可接受的疗效、较短的手术时间和较低的成本。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验