Suppr超能文献

数字 COVID-19 追踪在成人社会关怀中的使用和影响:大曼彻斯特护理院的前瞻性队列研究。

The use and impact of digital COVID-19 tracking in adult social care: a prospective cohort study of care homes in Greater Manchester.

机构信息

Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 23;23(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07939-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To support proactive care during the coronavirus pandemic, a digital COVID-19 symptom tracker was deployed in Greater Manchester (UK) care homes. This study aimed to understand what factors were associated with the post-uptake use of the tracker and whether the tracker had any effects in controlling the spread of COVID-19.

METHODS

Daily data on COVID-19, tracker uptake and use, and other key indicators such as staffing levels, the number of staff self-isolating, availability of personal protective equipment, bed occupancy levels, and any problems in accepting new residents were analysed for 547 care homes across Greater Manchester for the period April 2020 to April 2021. Differences in tracker use across local authorities, types of care homes, and over time were assessed using correlated effects logistic regressions. Differences in numbers of COVID-19 cases in homes adopting versus not adopting the tracker were compared via event design difference-in-difference estimations.

RESULTS

Homes adopting the tracker used it on 44% of days post-adoption. Use decreased by 88% after one year of uptake (odds ratio 0.12; 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.28). Use was highest in the locality initiating the project (odds ratio 31.73; 95% CI 3.76-268.05). Care homes owned by a chain had lower use (odds ratio 0.30; 95% CI 0.14-0.63 versus single ownership care homes), and use was not associated with COVID-19 or staffing levels. Tracker uptake had no impact on controlling COVID-19 spread. Staff self-isolating and local area COVID-19 cases were positively associated with lagged COVID-19 spread in care homes (relative risks 1.29; 1.2-1.4 and 1.05; 1.0-1.1, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the COVID-19 symptom tracker in care homes was not maintained except in Locality 1 and did not appear to reduce the COVID-19 spread. COVID-19 cases in care homes were mainly driven by care home local-area COVID-19 cases and infections among the staff members. Digital deterioration trackers should be co-produced with care home staff, and local authorities should provide long-term support in their adoption and use.

摘要

背景

为了在冠状病毒大流行期间提供积极主动的护理,大曼彻斯特(英国)护理院部署了一个数字 COVID-19 症状追踪器。本研究旨在了解哪些因素与追踪器的使用后有关,以及追踪器是否对控制 COVID-19 的传播有任何影响。

方法

对 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 4 月期间大曼彻斯特的 547 家护理院的 COVID-19 数据、追踪器的采用和使用情况以及其他关键指标(如人员配置水平、员工自我隔离人数、个人防护设备的可用性、床位占用水平以及接受新居民方面的任何问题)进行了每日分析。使用相关效应逻辑回归评估了地方当局、护理院类型以及随时间推移的追踪器使用情况的差异。通过事件设计差异差异估计比较了采用和不采用追踪器的家庭中 COVID-19 病例的数量差异。

结果

采用追踪器的家庭在采用后平均每天使用 44%。采用一年后使用率下降了 88%(优势比 0.12;95%置信区间 0.06-0.28)。在发起该项目的地方(优势比 31.73;95%CI 3.76-268.05)使用率最高。连锁拥有的养老院使用率较低(优势比 0.30;95%CI 0.14-0.63 与单一所有权养老院),且使用率与 COVID-19 或人员配置水平无关。追踪器的采用对控制 COVID-19 的传播没有影响。员工自我隔离和当地的 COVID-19 病例与养老院 COVID-19 的传播呈正相关(相对风险分别为 1.29;1.2-1.4 和 1.05;1.0-1.1)。

结论

除 1 区外,护理院的 COVID-19 症状追踪器的使用并未得到维持,并且似乎并未减少 COVID-19 的传播。护理院的 COVID-19 病例主要由护理院当地的 COVID-19 病例和工作人员感染引起。数字追踪器应与护理院工作人员共同制定,地方当局应在其采用和使用方面提供长期支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f3f/9872330/401c8f2c4730/12879_2022_7939_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验