• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大流行转变:面向退伍军人护理人员的虚拟自我护理课程。

Pandemic Shift: Virtual Self-Care Courses for Caregivers of Veterans.

作者信息

Martindale-Adams Jennifer, Stark Deanna, Zuber Jeffrey, Scariano Linda, Green April, Nichols Linda O

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA.

Caregiver Center, VA Medical Center Memphis, Memphis, USA.

出版信息

J Technol Behav Sci. 2023 Jan 19:1-7. doi: 10.1007/s41347-022-00294-y.

DOI:10.1007/s41347-022-00294-y
PMID:36691665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9849835/
Abstract

Self-care improves health and well-being, yet many caregivers neglect it. During COVID-19, self-care courses for caregivers of veterans transitioned from in-person to virtual videoconferencing. The format remained the same with caregiver groups and a trainer. This observational study examined in-person and virtual caregivers' satisfaction with courses. Caregivers (1120 in-person, 962 virtual) could attend five courses before and following March 2020 transition to virtual. Evaluations ( = 1665) examined demographics, satisfaction, and utility. Characteristics were compared between in-person and virtual participants using chi-squared tests. Qualitative caregiver comments were compared. Half of the caregivers were over 60 years old; 49% had been caregivers at least 6 years. Caregivers were primarily women (91%) and spouses (75%), with more spouses virtually ( = 0.006) and more men in-person ( < 0.001). Both groups endorsed learning new information, planning to use it in caregiving and for themselves, increasing knowledge and skills, and having needs met. Caregiver comments revealed six types of benefits: new information, information review, positive effects, interaction, plans to act, and instructor qualities. Caregivers in virtual groups more often mentioned learning more information, being reminded of information, and planning to take further action; in-person caregivers more often mentioned interaction as a benefit. Caregivers were satisfied with and found benefit from in-person and virtual self-care courses. Although in-person courses allow for more social connection with others, virtual courses offer decreased travel costs for instructors and increased convenience and access for caregivers.

摘要

自我护理可改善健康状况和幸福感,但许多护理人员却忽视了它。在新冠疫情期间,退伍军人护理人员的自我护理课程从面对面教学转变为虚拟视频会议形式。课程形式保持不变,仍有护理人员小组和一名培训师。这项观察性研究调查了面对面和虚拟教学模式下护理人员对课程的满意度。在2020年3月向虚拟教学转变之前和之后,护理人员(1120名面对面参与者,962名虚拟参与者)均可参加五门课程。评估(n = 1665)调查了人口统计学特征、满意度和实用性。使用卡方检验比较了面对面和虚拟参与者之间的特征。对护理人员的定性评论进行了比较。一半的护理人员年龄超过60岁;49%的人担任护理人员至少6年。护理人员主要为女性(91%)和配偶(75%),虚拟教学模式下配偶比例更高(p = 0.006),面对面教学模式下男性比例更高(p < 0.001)。两组人员都认可学习新信息、计划在护理工作及自身生活中运用所学、增加知识和技能以及需求得到满足。护理人员的评论揭示了六种益处:新信息、信息回顾、积极影响、互动、行动计划和教师素质。虚拟小组中的护理人员更常提到学到更多信息、被提醒相关信息以及计划采取进一步行动;面对面教学模式下的护理人员更常将互动视为一种益处。护理人员对面对面和虚拟自我护理课程都感到满意并从中受益。虽然面对面课程能让人与他人有更多社交联系,但虚拟课程为教师降低了差旅成本,为护理人员增加了便利性和可及性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d29/9849835/dfb23260d723/41347_2022_294_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d29/9849835/dfb23260d723/41347_2022_294_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d29/9849835/dfb23260d723/41347_2022_294_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pandemic Shift: Virtual Self-Care Courses for Caregivers of Veterans.大流行转变:面向退伍军人护理人员的虚拟自我护理课程。
J Technol Behav Sci. 2023 Jan 19:1-7. doi: 10.1007/s41347-022-00294-y.
2
Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia.远程为痴呆症患者的非正式照护者提供信息、培训和支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD006440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006440.pub3.
3
Converting a Geriatrics Clinic to Virtual Visits during COVID-19: A Case Study.在 COVID-19 期间将老年病学诊所转为虚拟就诊:案例研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211000235. doi: 10.1177/21501327211000235.
4
Family Caregiver Needs and Preferences for Virtual Training to Manage Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: Interview Study.家庭照顾者对管理痴呆症行为和心理症状的虚拟培训的需求与偏好:访谈研究
JMIR Aging. 2021 Feb 10;4(1):e24965. doi: 10.2196/24965.
5
Applying the RE-AIM framework to evaluate a holistic caregiver-centric hospital-to-home programme: a feasibility study on Carer Matters.运用 RE-AIM 框架评估整体以照顾者为中心的医院到家庭计划:以 Carer Matters 为例的可行性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):933. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08317-3.
6
Satisfaction With Telehealth Services Compared With Nontelehealth Services Among Pediatric Patients and Their Caregivers: Systematic Review of the Literature.儿科患者及其照顾者对远程医疗服务与非远程医疗服务的满意度:文献系统评价
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 Apr 27;6:e41554. doi: 10.2196/41554.
7
Assessing the Effectiveness of a Massive Open Online Course for Caregivers Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Methodological Study.评估新冠疫情期间面向护理人员的大规模在线开放课程的有效性:方法学研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 25;7:e48398. doi: 10.2196/48398.
8
It's time to address fear of cancer recurrence in family caregivers: usability study of an virtual version of the Family Caregiver-Fear Of Recurrence Therapy (FC-FORT).是时候关注家庭护理人员对癌症复发的恐惧了:家庭护理人员-复发恐惧疗法(FC-FORT)虚拟版本的可用性研究。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Aug 21;5:1129536. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1129536. eCollection 2023.
9
"We Don't Feel so Alone": A Qualitative Study of Virtual Memory Cafés to Support Social Connectedness Among Individuals Living With Dementia and Care Partners During COVID-19.《不再孤单:一项定性研究,探讨虚拟记忆咖啡馆在 COVID-19 期间如何支持痴呆症患者及其照护伙伴的社交联系》。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 13;9:660144. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.660144. eCollection 2021.
10
Acceptability and feasibility of the World Health Organization's Caregiver Skills Training Programme (WHO CST) delivered eLearning, videoconferencing, and in-person hybrid modalities in Hong Kong.世界卫生组织护理人员技能培训计划(WHO CST)以电子学习、视频会议和面对面混合模式在香港实施的可接受性和可行性。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 7;13:915263. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.915263. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Initial Validation of the Self-Care Practices Scale.自我护理实践量表的编制与初步验证。
Soc Work. 2019 Dec 20;65(1):21-28. doi: 10.1093/sw/swz045.
2
Health-Promoting Self-Care in Family Caregivers of People With Dementia: The Views of Multiple Stakeholders.促进痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的自我保健:多利益相关者的观点。
Gerontologist. 2019 Sep 17;59(5):e501-e511. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz029.
3
The impact of dementia caregiving on self-care management of caregivers and facilitators: a qualitative study.痴呆症护理对护理人员和协助者自我护理管理的影响:一项定性研究。
Psychogeriatrics. 2019 Jan;19(1):23-31. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12354. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
4
The Self-Care Needs and Behaviors of Dementia Informal Caregivers: A Systematic Review.痴呆症非专业照护者的自我护理需求和行为:系统评价。
Gerontologist. 2019 Sep 17;59(5):e565-e583. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny076.
5
Building Better Caregivers: A Pragmatic 12-Month Trial of a Community-Based Workshop for Caregivers of Cognitively Impaired Adults.构建更好的照护者:一项针对认知障碍成人照护者的基于社区的工作坊的实用 12 个月试验。
J Appl Gerontol. 2019 Sep;38(9):1228-1252. doi: 10.1177/0733464817741682. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
6
Predicting personal self-care in informal caregivers.预测非正式照料者的个人自我护理情况。
Soc Work Health Care. 2017 Oct;56(9):822-839. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2017.1344755. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
7
Smoking and Smoking Increase in Caregivers of Alzheimer's Patients.阿尔茨海默病患者照料者吸烟及吸烟率上升。
Gerontologist. 2015 Oct;55(5):780-92. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt149. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
8
Health-promoting self-care in family caregivers.
West J Nurs Res. 2002 Feb;24(1):73-86. doi: 10.1177/01939450222045716.
9
Self-care in health.健康中的自我保健。
Annu Rev Public Health. 1983;4:181-201. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.04.050183.001145.
10
Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.自我效能感:迈向行为改变的统一理论
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191.