Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA.
Ecology. 2023 Apr;104(4):e3978. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3978. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
Mutualistic interactions provide essential ecosystem functions that contribute to promoting and maintaining diversity in ecosystems. Understanding if functionally important mutualisms are "resilient" (i.e., able to resist or recover) to anthropogenic disturbance is essential for revealing the capacity for diversity to recover. Animal-mediated seed dispersal supports plant population growth and influences community structure, and disturbance affecting seed dispersal can contribute to low resiliency of plant diversity. Ant-seed dispersal mutualisms are sensitive to anthropogenic disturbance, as they rely on one to a few high-quality dispersal partners. In North American eastern deciduous forests, ants in the genus Aphaenogaster are "keystone dispersers" of understory forbs adapted to dispersal by ants (myrmecochores), which make up more than one-third of the understory herbaceous community. The majority of forests within this region have regenerated from previous disturbance in the form of clearing for agriculture. Previous studies have revealed that myrmecochore diversity is not resilient to previous clearing. Here, we ask if seed dispersal mutualisms are resilient to historical forest disturbance and if decreases in mutualistic interactions with partners, Aphaenogaster sp., or increases in antagonistic interactions cause degradation of function. In a large-scale natural experiment (20 sites), we measured seed removal, the abundance of mutualistic partners and other invertebrates interacting with seeds, myrmecochore cover, and diversity, along with ant habitat and forest structure. We found lower and more variable seed removal in secondary forests compared with remnant forests. A path analysis of all forests revealed that the abundance of mutualists was the primary determinant of the variation in seed removal, and that seed damage by antagonists (invasive slugs) negatively affected dispersal and was higher in secondary forests. In a path analysis of remnant forests, the link between mutualist abundance and seed removal was absent, but present in the secondary forest path, suggesting that seed dispersal is more variable and dependent on the mutualist abundance in secondary forests and is stable and high in remnant forests. Our results suggest that functional resilience to disturbance is variable, where seed dispersal is low in some secondary forests and not others. This work provides key insights into the effects of disturbance on mutualistic interactions and how the resilience of critical ecosystem functions impacts the capacity for diversity resiliency.
互利共生关系提供了重要的生态系统功能,有助于促进和维持生态系统的多样性。了解功能上重要的互利共生关系是否“有弹性”(即能够抵抗或恢复)人为干扰,对于揭示多样性的恢复能力至关重要。动物介导的种子传播支持植物种群的生长并影响群落结构,而影响种子传播的干扰可能导致植物多样性的恢复能力较低。蚁传粉互惠关系对人为干扰很敏感,因为它们依赖于一到几个高质量的传播伙伴。在北美的东部落叶林中,属 Aphaenogaster 的蚂蚁是适应蚂蚁(蚁传粉者)传播的林下草本植物(蚁传粉植物)的“关键传播者”,它们占林下草本植物群落的三分之一以上。该地区的大多数森林都是在前一次为农业而进行的清理等干扰后再生的。先前的研究表明,蚁传粉植物的多样性对以前的清理没有恢复力。在这里,我们询问种子传播互惠关系是否对历史森林干扰有弹性,如果与伙伴 Aphaenogaster sp. 的互惠相互作用减少,或与种子相互作用的拮抗相互作用增加是否会导致功能退化。在一项大规模的自然实验(20 个地点)中,我们测量了种子去除率、共生伙伴的丰度以及与种子相互作用的其他无脊椎动物、蚁传粉植物的覆盖率和多样性,以及蚂蚁栖息地和森林结构。我们发现次生林的种子去除率较低且更具变异性,与原始林相比。所有森林的路径分析表明,共生体的丰度是种子去除率变化的主要决定因素,而食草动物(入侵的鼻涕虫)对种子的损害会对传播产生负面影响,并且在次生林中更高。在原始林的路径分析中,共生体丰度和种子去除之间的联系不存在,但在次生林的路径中存在,这表明种子传播在次生林中更具变异性且依赖于共生体的丰度,而在原始林中则更稳定且更高。我们的研究结果表明,对干扰的功能恢复力是可变的,一些次生林的种子传播率较低,而另一些则较高。这项工作为干扰对互利共生关系的影响以及关键生态系统功能的恢复力如何影响多样性恢复能力提供了重要的见解。