Suppr超能文献

共同引入物种之间的互利共生促进了入侵并改变了植物群落结构。

Mutualism between co-introduced species facilitates invasion and alters plant community structure.

作者信息

Prior Kirsten M, Robinson Jennifer M, Meadley Dunphy Shannon A, Frederickson Megan E

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G5 Koffler Scientific Reserve, University of Toronto, King City, Ontario, Canada L7B 1K5

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G5 Koffler Scientific Reserve, University of Toronto, King City, Ontario, Canada L7B 1K5.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 7;282(1800):20142846. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2846.

Abstract

Generalized mutualisms are often predicted to be resilient to changes in partner identity. Variation in mutualism-related traits between native and invasive species however, can exacerbate the spread of invasive species ('invasional meltdown') if invasive partners strongly interact. Here we show how invasion by a seed-dispersing ant (Myrmica rubra) promotes recruitment of a co-introduced invasive over native ant-dispersed (myrmecochorous) plants. We created experimental communities of invasive (M. rubra) or native ants (Aphaenogaster rudis) and invasive and native plants and measured seed dispersal and plant recruitment. In our mesocosms, and in laboratory and field trials, M. rubra acted as a superior seed disperser relative to the native ant. By contrast, previous studies have found that invasive ants are often poor seed dispersers compared with native ants. Despite belonging to the same behavioural guild, seed-dispersing ants were not functionally redundant. Instead, native and invasive ants had strongly divergent effects on plant communities: the invasive plant dominated in the presence of the invasive ant and the native plants dominated in the presence of the native ant. Community changes were not due to preferences for coevolved partners: variation in functional traits of linked partners drove differences. Here, we show that strongly interacting introduced mutualists can be major drivers of ecological change.

摘要

广义共生关系通常被认为对伙伴身份的变化具有弹性。然而,如果入侵物种的伙伴之间存在强烈相互作用,本地物种和入侵物种之间与共生关系相关的性状差异可能会加剧入侵物种的扩散(“入侵崩溃”)。在这里,我们展示了一种种子传播蚂蚁(红蚁)的入侵如何促进一种共同引入的入侵植物而非本地蚂蚁传播(蚁播)植物的招募。我们创建了由入侵蚂蚁(红蚁)或本地蚂蚁( rudis 盲切叶蚁)以及入侵植物和本地植物组成的实验群落,并测量了种子传播和植物招募情况。在我们的中型生态箱以及实验室和田间试验中,相对于本地蚂蚁,红蚁是更优秀的种子传播者。相比之下,先前的研究发现,与本地蚂蚁相比,入侵蚂蚁通常是较差的种子传播者。尽管属于同一行为类群,但种子传播蚂蚁在功能上并非冗余。相反,本地蚂蚁和入侵蚂蚁对植物群落有截然不同的影响:入侵植物在入侵蚂蚁存在时占主导地位,而本地植物在本地蚂蚁存在时占主导地位。群落变化并非由于对共同进化伙伴的偏好:相关伙伴功能性状的差异导致了这些不同。在这里,我们表明,强烈相互作用的引入共生者可能是生态变化的主要驱动因素。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
The role of ants in north temperate grasslands: a review.蚂蚁在北温带草原中的作用:综述
Oecologia. 2018 Feb;186(2):323-338. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-4007-0. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
8
Population-specific responses to an invasive species.特定种群对入侵物种的反应。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Aug 7;282(1812):20151063. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1063.

本文引用的文献

1
How exotic plants integrate into pollination networks.外来植物如何融入授粉网络。
J Ecol. 2014 Nov;102(6):1442-1450. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12310. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
2
Signals can trump rewards in attracting seed-dispersing ants.信号可以胜过奖励来吸引传播种子的蚂蚁。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 13;8(8):e71871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071871. eCollection 2013.
7
Mutualisms in a changing world: an evolutionary perspective.在不断变化的世界中互利共生:进化视角。
Ecol Lett. 2010 Dec;13(12):1459-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01538.x. Epub 2010 Oct 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验