Geisler Birte Linny, Amperidou Ourania, Pauly Sina Patricia, Mattern Sven, Schürch Christian M, Hermann Claudia, Stoffregen Christiane, Steinleitner Ilona, Paigin Natali, Lamß Claudia, Fend Falko, Rieger Monika A, Rind Esther, Preiser Christine
Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital and Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 18;27:e63366. doi: 10.2196/63366.
To transition to a fully digital workflow, a pathology department in a German university hospital reorganized its processes, upgrading and integrating new technologies such as an updated laboratory information system and high-throughput scanners. While the visions of digital pathology follow a "promissory rhetoric" of improved patient care, studies name technological and professional challenges of digital pathology. We examined the experiences of the pathology staff with the digital transformation process from an occupational health perspective, focusing on the mutual influences between digital transformation and work-related psychosocial demands and resources.
The purpose of this study was to explore the interactions between occupational health and digital transformation in the workplace based on a holistic analysis of an ongoing digital transformation process.
We conducted participant observation, focus groups, qualitative interviews, and document analysis using an ethnographic research design. The pathology department had approximately 100 employees. More than 30 pathology staff members and supervisors from the diagnostics, laboratory, quality management, administration, and IT areas participated. Data were collected in 3 field phases between July 2022 and December 2023, representing different stages of the digital transformation. Data were analyzed using the reflexive thematic analysis method of Braun and Clarke. In addition, 2 member-checking workshops were conducted with the entire pathology team.
We identified 2 key themes and 7 subthemes. The 2 key themes were (1) highly demanding work in a complex system that does not fit and (2) striving for steadiness in an open-ended process. What we found was that the pathology department under study experienced a digital transformation process with scarce human, time, and technological resources. The results showed that the process was at the expense of the people. Digital transformation remained a compromise and did not (yet) deliver on the promise of increased work efficiency and reduced workload. The demand-resource mismatch emerged as a major digital transformation stressor. However, the slower transformation was leveraged by the pathology staff to improve the organizational culture and (again) find creative workarounds. Digital transformation led to the renegotiation of work roles and identity. It also led to the creation of a new network of connections through the implementation of new technologies but also through the creation of new forms of team communication.
The modernization of the health care system is necessary, but it risks taking place under inadequate working conditions. Increased work intensity and perceived psychosocial stress during the transformation process threaten to drive even more people out of the health care system. Therefore, protecting the occupational health of the people implementing digital transformation should be at the core of planning digital transformation projects.
为了向全数字化工作流程转型,德国一家大学医院的病理科对其流程进行了重组,升级并整合了新技术,如更新后的实验室信息系统和高通量扫描仪。虽然数字病理学的愿景遵循着改善患者护理的“承诺性言辞”,但研究指出了数字病理学在技术和专业方面的挑战。我们从职业健康的角度审视了病理科工作人员在数字化转型过程中的经历,重点关注数字化转型与工作相关的社会心理需求和资源之间的相互影响。
本研究的目的是基于对正在进行的数字化转型过程的全面分析,探索工作场所职业健康与数字化转型之间的相互作用。
我们采用人种志研究设计进行了参与观察、焦点小组讨论、定性访谈和文件分析。病理科约有100名员工。来自诊断、实验室、质量管理、行政和信息技术领域的30多名病理科工作人员和主管参与了研究。在2022年7月至2023年12月的3个实地阶段收集数据,代表数字化转型的不同阶段。使用布劳恩和克拉克的反思性主题分析方法对数据进行分析。此外,还与整个病理团队举办了2次成员核对研讨会。
我们确定了2个关键主题和7个子主题。这2个关键主题是:(1)在一个不匹配的复杂系统中从事高要求工作;(2)在一个开放式过程中追求稳定性。我们发现,所研究的病理科在人力、时间和技术资源稀缺的情况下经历了数字化转型过程。结果表明,这一过程是以人员为代价的。数字化转型仍然是一种妥协,尚未兑现提高工作效率和减轻工作量的承诺。需求-资源不匹配成为数字化转型的一个主要压力源。然而,病理科工作人员利用较慢的转型速度来改善组织文化,并(再次)找到创造性的解决办法。数字化转型导致了工作角色和身份的重新协商。它还通过新技术的实施以及新形式的团队沟通的创建,促成了一个新的联系网络的形成。
医疗保健系统的现代化是必要的,但它有可能在工作条件不足的情况下进行。转型过程中工作强度的增加和感知到的社会心理压力有可能导致更多的人离开医疗保健系统。因此,保护实施数字化转型人员的职业健康应成为数字化转型项目规划的核心。