GI & HPB Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 24;408(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02776-w.
Most studies identifying risk factors for post-hepatectomy biliary leaks (PHBLs) have relatively small proportions of major hepatectomies. A simplified predictive score to identify high risk patients is necessary in order to investigate the efficacy of mitigation strategies.
A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of liver resections from a high-volume cancer center was performed. Multivariate regression was utilized for identification of risk factors and development of the predictive score.
A total of 862 patients underwent a curative hepatic resection over 10 years, of whom 146 (16.9%) developed a biliary leak; 85 (9.86%), 52 (6.03%), and 9 (1.04%) patients had a grade A, B, and C leak respectively. A biliary-enteric anastomosis [OR 5.1 (95% CI 2.45-10.58); p < 0.001], a central [OR 4.33 (95% CI 1.25-14.95); p = 0.021] or an extended hepatectomy [OR 4.29 (95% CI 1.52-12.12); p = 0.006], liver steatosis [OR 2.28 (95% CI 1.09-4.77); p = 0.027], and blood loss of ≥ 2000 mL [OR 2.219 (95% CI 1.15-4.27); p = 0.017] were identified as independent predictors of a clinically significant biliary leak and were assigned 1 point each to develop the biliary leak score. Clinically significant biliary leaks were seen in 11 (2.79%), 20 (6.38%), 19 (15.4%), 9 (56.3%), and 1 (100%) patients with scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively (p < 0.001).
A biliary-enteric anastomosis, a central or extended hepatectomy, liver steatosis, and blood loss ≥ 2L combined result in a simple predictive score for clinically significant biliary leaks.
大多数确定肝切除术后胆漏(PHBL)风险因素的研究中,大切除术的比例相对较小。为了研究缓解策略的疗效,有必要制定一种简单的预测评分来识别高危患者。
对一个高容量癌症中心前瞻性维护的肝切除术数据库进行回顾性分析。利用多变量回归确定危险因素并开发预测评分。
在 10 年期间,共有 862 例患者接受了根治性肝切除术,其中 146 例(16.9%)发生了胆漏;85 例(9.86%)、52 例(6.03%)和 9 例(1.04%)患者分别发生 A、B 和 C 级漏。胆肠吻合术[比值比(OR)5.1(95%可信区间 2.45-10.58);p<0.001]、中央[OR 4.33(95%可信区间 1.25-14.95);p=0.021]或扩大肝切除术[OR 4.29(95%可信区间 1.52-12.12);p=0.006]、肝脂肪变性[OR 2.28(95%可信区间 1.09-4.77);p=0.027]和出血量≥2000ml[OR 2.219(95%可信区间 1.15-4.27);p=0.017]被确定为临床显著胆漏的独立预测因素,并分别赋值 1 分以制定胆漏评分。评分 0、1、2、3 和 4 的患者中分别有 11 例(2.79%)、20 例(6.38%)、19 例(15.4%)、9 例(56.3%)和 1 例(100%)发生临床显著胆漏(p<0.001)。
胆肠吻合术、中央或扩大肝切除术、肝脂肪变性和出血量≥2L 联合导致了一种用于预测临床显著胆漏的简单预测评分。