Yonsei University.
Louisiana State University.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2023 Aug 1;48(4):569-592. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10449887.
On June 24, 2022, the US Supreme Court decided in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization (597 U.S. (2022)) to overturn the constitutional right to abortion, a seismic shift in abortion policy that makes the states key battlegrounds in fights over abortion and broader reproductive rights. This article focuses on the role of state supreme courts in setting state abortion policies. Using an original data set of state court decisions surrounding abortion from the past 20 years, the authors investigate how two overarching factors affect state supreme court decision-making on abortion. First, they track how states' political environments affect the decisions courts make about access to abortion. Second, the authors consider the scope of the abortion policy considered by the courts. The authors find that the partisan makeup of state legislatures does not influence the direction of state supreme courts' rulings on abortion issues, but it does affect the scope of abortion regulation being considered by the courts. Additionally, they find that elected judges tend to be more responsive to constituent preferences when ruling on abortion policies. Overall, these findings illustrate the multifaceted dynamics involved in state supreme courts' rulings on abortion.
2022 年 6 月 24 日,美国最高法院在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案(Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization,597 U.S. (2022))中裁定推翻了堕胎的宪法权利,这是堕胎政策的重大转变,使各州成为堕胎和更广泛生殖权利斗争的关键战场。本文重点关注州最高法院在制定州堕胎政策方面的作用。作者使用过去 20 年围绕堕胎的州法院判决的原始数据集,调查了两个总体因素如何影响州最高法院在堕胎问题上的决策。首先,他们跟踪各州的政治环境如何影响法院对堕胎准入的决策。其次,作者考虑了法院审议的堕胎政策范围。作者发现,州立法机构的党派构成不会影响州最高法院在堕胎问题上裁决的方向,但确实会影响法院审议的堕胎监管范围。此外,他们发现,民选法官在裁决堕胎政策时往往更能响应选民的偏好。总的来说,这些发现说明了州最高法院在堕胎问题上裁决所涉及的多方面动态。