Suppr超能文献

在 50 个国家的重症监护病房中进行机械通气撤离(WEAN SAFE):一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究。

Weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care units across 50 countries (WEAN SAFE): a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study.

机构信息

Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, AP-HP, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU CORREVE, FHU SEPSIS, Groupe de Recherche CARMAS, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Université Paris-Sud, Inserm U1018, Equipe d'Epidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, CESP, 94807, Villejuif, France.

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Respir Med. 2023 May;11(5):465-476. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00449-0. Epub 2023 Jan 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current management practices and outcomes in weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation are poorly understood. We aimed to describe the epidemiology, management, timings, risk for failure, and outcomes of weaning in patients requiring at least 2 days of invasive mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

WEAN SAFE was an international, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study done in 481 intensive care units in 50 countries. Eligible participants were older than 16 years, admitted to a participating intensive care unit, and receiving mechanical ventilation for 2 calendar days or longer. We defined weaning initiation as the first attempt to separate a patient from the ventilator, successful weaning as no reintubation or death within 7 days of extubation, and weaning eligibility criteria based on positive end-expiratory pressure, fractional concentration of oxygen in inspired air, and vasopressors. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients successfully weaned at 90 days. Key secondary outcomes included weaning duration, timing of weaning events, factors associated with weaning delay and weaning failure, and hospital outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03255109.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 4, 2017, and June 25, 2018, 10 232 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 5869 were enrolled. 4523 (77·1%) patients underwent at least one separation attempt and 3817 (65·0%) patients were successfully weaned from ventilation at day 90. 237 (4·0%) patients were transferred before any separation attempt, 153 (2·6%) were transferred after at least one separation attempt and not successfully weaned, and 1662 (28·3%) died while invasively ventilated. The median time from fulfilling weaning eligibility criteria to first separation attempt was 1 day (IQR 0-4), and 1013 (22·4%) patients had a delay in initiating first separation of 5 or more days. Of the 4523 (77·1%) patients with separation attempts, 2927 (64·7%) had a short wean (≤1 day), 457 (10·1%) had intermediate weaning (2-6 days), 433 (9·6%) required prolonged weaning (≥7 days), and 706 (15·6%) had weaning failure. Higher sedation scores were independently associated with delayed initiation of weaning. Delayed initiation of weaning and higher sedation scores were independently associated with weaning failure. 1742 (31·8%) of 5479 patients died in the intensive care unit and 2095 (38·3%) of 5465 patients died in hospital.

INTERPRETATION

In critically ill patients receiving at least 2 days of invasive mechanical ventilation, only 65% were weaned at 90 days. A better understanding of factors that delay the weaning process, such as delays in weaning initiation or excessive sedation levels, might improve weaning success rates.

FUNDING

European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, European Respiratory Society.

摘要

背景

目前对于有创机械通气撤机的管理实践和结果仍知之甚少。我们旨在描述至少需要 2 天有创机械通气的患者撤机的流行病学、管理、时机、失败风险和结局。

方法

WEAN SAFE 是一项国际性、多中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究,在 50 个国家的 481 个重症监护病房进行。纳入标准为年龄大于 16 岁,入住参与研究的重症监护病房,并且接受机械通气 2 个日历日或更长时间。我们将撤机起始定义为首次尝试将患者与呼吸机分离,成功撤机定义为拔管后 7 天内无再插管或死亡,撤机资格标准基于呼气末正压、吸入空气氧分数和血管加压素。主要结局为 90 天时成功撤机的患者比例。关键次要结局包括撤机时间、撤机事件的时机、与撤机延迟和撤机失败相关的因素以及住院结局。该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT03255109。

发现

2017 年 10 月 4 日至 2018 年 6 月 25 日,对 10232 名患者进行了筛选,其中 5869 名患者符合入选条件。4523 名(77.1%)患者进行了至少一次分离尝试,3817 名(65.0%)患者在第 90 天成功撤机。237 名(4.0%)患者在进行任何分离尝试之前转科,153 名(2.6%)患者在进行至少一次分离尝试但未成功撤机后转科,1662 名(28.3%)患者在有创通气时死亡。从符合撤机资格标准到首次分离尝试的中位时间为 1 天(IQR 0-4),1013 名(22.4%)患者首次分离延迟 5 天或更长时间。在 4523 名(77.1%)进行分离尝试的患者中,2927 名(64.7%)患者撤机时间较短(≤1 天),457 名(10.1%)患者撤机时间中等(2-6 天),433 名(9.6%)患者撤机时间较长(≥7 天),706 名(15.6%)患者撤机失败。较高的镇静评分与撤机起始延迟独立相关。撤机起始延迟和较高的镇静评分与撤机失败独立相关。5479 名(31.8%)患者在重症监护病房死亡,5465 名(38.3%)患者在医院死亡。

结论

在接受至少 2 天有创机械通气的危重症患者中,只有 65%在 90 天时撤机。更好地了解延迟撤机过程的因素,如撤机起始延迟或过度镇静水平,可能会提高撤机成功率。

资助

欧洲重症监护医学学会、欧洲呼吸学会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验