Landais Mickaël, Nay Mai-Anh, Auchabie Johann, Hubert Noemie, Frerou Aurélien, Yehia Aihem, Mercat Alain, Jonas Maud, Martino Frédéric, Moriconi Mikael, Courte Anne, Robert-Edan Vincent, Conia Alexandre, Bavozet Florent, Egreteau Pierre-Yves, Bruel Cédric, Renault Anne, Huet Olivier, Feller Marc, Chudeau Nicolas, Ferrandiere Martine, Rebion Anne, Robert Alain, Giraudeau Bruno, Reignier Jean, Thille Arnaud W, Tavernier Elsa, Ehrmann Stephan
Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier du Mans, Le Mans, France.
Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, Orléans Cedex 2, France.
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Apr;11(4):319-328. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00413-1. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
BACKGROUND: Fasting is frequently imposed before extubation in patients in intensive care units, with the aim to reduce risk of aspiration. This unevaluated practice might delay extubation, increase workload, and reduce caloric intake. We aimed to compare continued enteral nutrition until extubation with fasting before extubation in patients in the intensive care unit. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, cluster-randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial in 22 intensive care units in France. Patients aged 18 years or older were eligible for enrolment if they had received invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h in the intensive care unit and received prepyloric enteral nutrition for at least 24 h at the time of extubation decision. Centres were randomly assigned (1:1) to continued enteral nutrition until extubation or 6-h fasting with concomitant gastric suctioning before extubation, to be applied for all patients within the unit. Masking was not possible because of the nature of the trial. The primary outcome was extubation failure (composite criteria of reintubation or death) within 7 days after extubation, assessed in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The non-inferiority margin was set at 10%. Pneumonia within 14 days of extubation was a key secondary endpoint. This trial is now complete and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03335345. FINDINGS: Between April 1, 2018, and Oct 31, 2019, 7056 patients receiving enteral nutrition and mechanical ventilation were admitted to the intensive care units and 4198 were assessed for eligibility. 1130 patients were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat population and 1008 were included in the per-protocol population. In the intention-to-treat population, extubation failure occurred in 106 (17·2%) of 617 patients assigned to receive continued enteral nutrition until extubation versus 90 (17·5%) of 513 assigned to fasting, meeting the a priori defined non-inferiority criterion (absolute difference -0·4%, 95% CI -5·2 to 4·5). In the per-protocol population, extubation failure occurred in 101 (17·0%) of 595 patients assigned to receive continued enteral nutrition versus 74 (17·9%) of 413 assigned to fasting (absolute difference -0·9%, 95% CI -5·6 to 3·7). Pneumonia within 14 days of extubation occurred in ten (1·6%) patients assigned to receive continued enteral nutrition and 13 (2·5%) assigned to fasting (rate ratio 0·77, 95% CI 0·22 to 2·69). INTERPRETATION: Continued enteral nutrition until extubation in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit was non-inferior to a 6-h fasting maximum gastric vacuity strategy comprising continuous gastric tube suctioning, in terms of extubation failure within 7 days (a patient-centred outcome), and thus represents a potential alternative in this population. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
背景:重症监护病房的患者在拔管前经常进行禁食,目的是降低误吸风险。这种未经评估的做法可能会延迟拔管、增加工作量并减少热量摄入。我们旨在比较重症监护病房患者在拔管前持续肠内营养与禁食的效果。 方法:我们在法国的22个重症监护病房进行了一项开放标签、整群随机、平行组、非劣效性试验。年龄在18岁及以上、在重症监护病房接受有创机械通气至少48小时且在决定拔管时接受幽门后肠内营养至少24小时的患者符合入组条件。各中心被随机分配(1:1)为拔管前持续肠内营养或拔管前6小时禁食并同时进行胃吸引,适用于该单位内的所有患者。由于试验的性质,无法进行盲法。主要结局是拔管后7天内的拔管失败(重新插管或死亡的综合标准),在意向性分析人群和符合方案人群中均进行评估。非劣效性界值设定为10%。拔管后14天内的肺炎是一个关键次要终点。该试验现已完成,并已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT03335345。 结果:在2018年4月1日至2019年10月31日期间,7056例接受肠内营养和机械通气的患者入住重症监护病房,4198例接受资格评估。1130例患者入组并纳入意向性分析人群,1008例纳入符合方案人群。在意向性分析人群中,分配接受拔管前持续肠内营养的617例患者中有106例(17.2%)拔管失败,而分配接受禁食的513例患者中有90例(17.5%)拔管失败,符合预先定义的非劣效性标准(绝对差异-0.4%,95%CI-5.2至4.5)。在符合方案人群中,分配接受持续肠内营养的595例患者中有101例(17.0%)拔管失败,而分配接受禁食的413例患者中有74例(17.9%)拔管失败(绝对差异-于0.9%,95%CI-5.6至3.7)。拔管后14天内,分配接受持续肠内营养的患者中有10例(1.6%)发生肺炎,分配接受禁食的患者中有13例(2.5%)发生肺炎(率比0.77,95%CI0.22至2.69)。 解读:在重症监护病房的危重症患者中,拔管前持续肠内营养在7天内的拔管失败(以患者为中心的结局)方面不劣于包括持续胃管吸引的6小时禁食最大胃排空策略,因此是该人群的一种潜在替代方案。 资助:法国卫生部。 中文翻译摘要见补充材料部分。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1