Mizumoto Junki, Mitsuyama Toshichika, Eto Masato, Izumiya Masashi, Horita Shoko
Department of Medical Education Studies, International Research Center for Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Medical Education Studies, International Research Center for Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
BJGP Open. 2023 Mar 21;7(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0129. Print 2023 Mar.
Several organisations have called for primary care professionals to address social determinants of health (SDoH) in clinical settings. For primary care physicians to fulfill their community health responsibilities, the implications of the SDoH recommendations need to be clarified.
To describe primary care physicians' views about being asked to address SDoH in clinical settings, from both positive and negative perspectives.
DESIGN & SETTING: A qualitative study in Japan. Twenty-one physicians were purposively recruited.
'Love and breakup letter' methodology was used to collect qualitative data that contained both positive and negative feelings. Participants wrote love and breakup letters about being asked to address SDoH in a clinical setting, then undertook an in-depth online interview. Data were analysed via thematic analysis using the framework approach.
The following themes were identified: (i) primary care physicians take pride in being expected to address SDoH; (ii) primary care physicians rely on the recommendations as a partner, even in difficult situations; (iii) primary care physicians consider the recommendations to be bothersome, with unreasonable demands and challenges, especially when supportive surroundings are lacking; and (iv) primary care physicians reconstruct the recommendations on the basis of their experience.
Primary care physicians felt both sympathy and antipathy towards recommendations asking them to address SDoH in their clinical practice. The recommendations were not followed literally, instead contributing to physicians' clinical mindlines. Professional organisations that plan to develop and publish recommendations about SDoH should consider how their recommendations might be perceived by their target audience.
多个组织呼吁初级保健专业人员在临床环境中解决健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)。为使初级保健医生履行其社区卫生职责,需要阐明SDoH建议的影响。
从积极和消极两个角度描述初级保健医生对在临床环境中被要求解决SDoH的看法。
在日本进行的一项定性研究。有目的地招募了21名医生。
采用“情书与分手信”方法收集包含积极和消极感受的定性数据。参与者撰写关于在临床环境中被要求解决SDoH的情书和分手信,然后进行深入的在线访谈。使用框架方法通过主题分析对数据进行分析。
确定了以下主题:(i)初级保健医生为被期望解决SDoH而感到自豪;(ii)即使在困难情况下,初级保健医生也将这些建议视为合作伙伴;(iii)初级保健医生认为这些建议麻烦,要求不合理且具有挑战性,尤其是在缺乏支持性环境时;(iv)初级保健医生根据自己的经验对这些建议进行重新构建。
初级保健医生对要求他们在临床实践中解决SDoH的建议既感到同情又反感。这些建议并未被严格遵循,而是有助于医生的临床思路。计划制定和发布关于SDoH建议的专业组织应考虑其目标受众可能如何看待这些建议。