• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Primary care physicians' perceptions of social determinants of health recommendations: a qualitative study.初级保健医生对健康建议的社会决定因素的看法:一项定性研究。
BJGP Open. 2023 Mar 21;7(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0129. Print 2023 Mar.
2
Clinical problem solving and social determinants of health: a descriptive study using unannounced standardized patients to directly observe how resident physicians respond to social determinants of health.临床问题解决与健康的社会决定因素:一项描述性研究,使用未事先通知的标准化患者直接观察住院医师如何应对健康的社会决定因素。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 Aug 27;7(3):313-324. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0002.
3
Incorporating social determinants of health into individual care-a multidisciplinary perspective of health professionals who work with people who have type 2 diabetes.将健康的社会决定因素纳入个体护理中——从事 2 型糖尿病患者工作的健康专业人员的多学科视角。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 8;17(8):e0271980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271980. eCollection 2022.
4
Integration of social determinants of health information within the primary care electronic health record: a systematic review of patient perspectives and experiences.将健康信息的社会决定因素整合到基层医疗电子健康记录中:对患者观点和经历的系统评价
BJGP Open. 2024 Apr 25;8(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0155. Print 2024 Apr.
5
Impact of social determinants of health on cancer care: a survey of community oncologists.社会健康决定因素对癌症护理的影响:对社区肿瘤学家的调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 6;11(10):e049259. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049259.
6
Linking Electronic Health Records and In-Depth Interviews to Inform Efforts to Integrate Social Determinants of Health Into Health Care Delivery: Protocol for a Qualitative Research Study.将电子健康记录与深入访谈相联系,为将健康的社会决定因素纳入医疗服务的努力提供信息:一项定性研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 11;11(3):e36201. doi: 10.2196/36201.
7
Raising patient voices in medical education: an assessment of patient perceived effect of social determinants of health conversations and the patient-physician relationship on quality of obstetric care, to inform the development of patient driven medical education curricula.在医学教育中提升患者声音:评估患者对健康社会决定因素对话以及医患关系对产科护理质量的感知影响,以为患者驱动的医学教育课程开发提供参考。
Front Reprod Health. 2024 Feb 15;6:1283390. doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1283390. eCollection 2024.
8
Integrating the Social Determinants of Health into Nursing Practice: Nurses' Perspectives.将健康的社会决定因素融入护理实践:护士的观点。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020 Sep;52(5):497-505. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12584. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
9
Social Determinants of Health and After-Hours Electronic Health Record Documentation: A National Survey of US Physicians.健康的社会决定因素与非工作时间电子健康记录文档:对美国医师的全国性调查。
Popul Health Manag. 2022 Jun;25(3):362-366. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0212. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
10
Inclusion of Social and Structural Determinants of Health to Advance Understanding of their Influence on the Biology of Chronic Disease.纳入健康的社会和结构决定因素以促进对其对慢性病生物学影响的理解。
Curr Protoc. 2022 Oct;2(10):e556. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.556.

引用本文的文献

1
The BJGP Open Top 10 Most Read Research Articles of 2023: an editorial.《英国全科医学杂志·开放版》2023年十大最受关注研究文章:一篇社论
BJGP Open. 2024 Apr 25;8(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0042. Print 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
A report of the social determinants of health workshop: Muddle cleared up in a polylogue.一份关于健康的社会决定因素研讨会的报告:在一场多方对话中理清头绪。
J Gen Fam Med. 2022 Jun 2;23(6):411-412. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.561. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Overwork among resident physicians: national questionnaire survey results.住院医师过度劳累:全国问卷调查结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Oct 20;22(1):729. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03789-7.
3
Experience of residents learning about social determinants of health and an assessment tool: Mixed-methods research.住院医师学习健康的社会决定因素及评估工具的经验:混合方法研究
J Gen Fam Med. 2022 May 15;23(5):319-326. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.559. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Various perspectives of "General Medicine" in Japan-Respect for and cooperation with each other as the same "General Medicine Physicians".日本“全科医学”的多元视角——作为同样的“全科医生”相互尊重与合作。
J Gen Fam Med. 2021 Nov 1;22(6):314-315. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.500. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Should we screen for poverty in primary care?我们应该在初级医疗保健中筛查贫困情况吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Sep 30;71(711):468-469. doi: 10.3399/bjgp21X717317. Print 2021 Oct.
6
Primary care physicians' narratives on COVID-19 responses in Japan: Professional roles evoked under a pandemic.日本基层医疗医生关于应对新冠疫情的叙述:大流行下所发挥的专业角色
J Gen Fam Med. 2021 May 14;22(6):316-326. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.452. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Redesigning Family Medicine Training to Meet the Emerging Health Care Needs of Patients and Communities: Be the Change We Wish to See.重新设计家庭医学培训以满足患者和社区不断涌现的医疗保健需求:成为我们希望看到的改变。
Fam Med. 2021 Jul 7;53(7):499-505. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2021.897904. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
8
Love and breakup letter methodology: A new research technique for medical education.爱的与分手信方法学:医学教育的一种新研究技术。
Med Educ. 2021 Jul;55(7):818-824. doi: 10.1111/medu.14463. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
9
Primary care consultation length by deprivation and multimorbidity in England: an observational study using electronic patient records.英格兰按贫困程度和多重疾病划分的初级保健咨询时长:一项使用电子患者记录的观察性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Feb 25;71(704):e185-e192. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X714029. Print 2021.
10
How medical school alters empathy: Student love and break up letters to empathy for patients.医学院如何改变同理心:学生写给对病人的同理心的情书和分手信。
Med Educ. 2021 Mar;55(3):394-403. doi: 10.1111/medu.14403. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

初级保健医生对健康建议的社会决定因素的看法:一项定性研究。

Primary care physicians' perceptions of social determinants of health recommendations: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Mizumoto Junki, Mitsuyama Toshichika, Eto Masato, Izumiya Masashi, Horita Shoko

机构信息

Department of Medical Education Studies, International Research Center for Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Department of Medical Education Studies, International Research Center for Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

BJGP Open. 2023 Mar 21;7(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0129. Print 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0129
PMID:36693758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10354320/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several organisations have called for primary care professionals to address social determinants of health (SDoH) in clinical settings. For primary care physicians to fulfill their community health responsibilities, the implications of the SDoH recommendations need to be clarified.

AIM

To describe primary care physicians' views about being asked to address SDoH in clinical settings, from both positive and negative perspectives.

DESIGN & SETTING: A qualitative study in Japan. Twenty-one physicians were purposively recruited.

METHOD

'Love and breakup letter' methodology was used to collect qualitative data that contained both positive and negative feelings. Participants wrote love and breakup letters about being asked to address SDoH in a clinical setting, then undertook an in-depth online interview. Data were analysed via thematic analysis using the framework approach.

RESULTS

The following themes were identified: (i) primary care physicians take pride in being expected to address SDoH; (ii) primary care physicians rely on the recommendations as a partner, even in difficult situations; (iii) primary care physicians consider the recommendations to be bothersome, with unreasonable demands and challenges, especially when supportive surroundings are lacking; and (iv) primary care physicians reconstruct the recommendations on the basis of their experience.

CONCLUSION

Primary care physicians felt both sympathy and antipathy towards recommendations asking them to address SDoH in their clinical practice. The recommendations were not followed literally, instead contributing to physicians' clinical mindlines. Professional organisations that plan to develop and publish recommendations about SDoH should consider how their recommendations might be perceived by their target audience.

摘要

背景

多个组织呼吁初级保健专业人员在临床环境中解决健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)。为使初级保健医生履行其社区卫生职责,需要阐明SDoH建议的影响。

目的

从积极和消极两个角度描述初级保健医生对在临床环境中被要求解决SDoH的看法。

设计与背景

在日本进行的一项定性研究。有目的地招募了21名医生。

方法

采用“情书与分手信”方法收集包含积极和消极感受的定性数据。参与者撰写关于在临床环境中被要求解决SDoH的情书和分手信,然后进行深入的在线访谈。使用框架方法通过主题分析对数据进行分析。

结果

确定了以下主题:(i)初级保健医生为被期望解决SDoH而感到自豪;(ii)即使在困难情况下,初级保健医生也将这些建议视为合作伙伴;(iii)初级保健医生认为这些建议麻烦,要求不合理且具有挑战性,尤其是在缺乏支持性环境时;(iv)初级保健医生根据自己的经验对这些建议进行重新构建。

结论

初级保健医生对要求他们在临床实践中解决SDoH的建议既感到同情又反感。这些建议并未被严格遵循,而是有助于医生的临床思路。计划制定和发布关于SDoH建议的专业组织应考虑其目标受众可能如何看待这些建议。