• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为养老院常规健康数据的二次利用建立治理框架:使用定性访谈的开发研究。

Setting up a Governance Framework for Secondary Use of Routine Health Data in Nursing Homes: Development Study Using Qualitative Interviews.

机构信息

Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Tranzo, School of Social Sciences and Behavioural Research, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 25;25:e38929. doi: 10.2196/38929.

DOI:10.2196/38929
PMID:36696162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9909520/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the nursing home sector, reusing routinely recorded data from electronic health records (EHRs) for knowledge development and quality improvement is still in its infancy. Trust in appropriate and responsible reuse is crucial for patients and nursing homes deciding whether to share EHR data for these purposes. A data governance framework determines who may access the data, under what conditions, and for what purposes. This can help obtain that trust. Although increasing attention is being paid to data governance in the health care sector, little guidance is available on development and implementation of a data governance framework in practice.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe the development process of a governance framework for the "Registry Learning from Data in Nursing Homes," a national registry for EHR data on care delivered by nursing home physicians (in Dutch: specialist ouderengeneeskunde) in Dutch nursing homes-to allow data reusage for research and quality improvement of care.

METHODS

Relevant stakeholders representing practices, policies, and research in the nursing home sector were identified. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 people from 14 stakeholder organizations. The main aim of the interviews was to explore stakeholders' perspectives regarding the Registry's aim, data access criteria, and governing bodies' tasks and composition. Interview topics and analyses were guided by 8 principles regarding governance for reusing health data, as described in the literature. Interview results, together with legal advice and consensus discussions by the Registry's consortium partners, were used to shape the rules, regulations, and governing bodies of the governance framework.

RESULTS

Stakeholders valued the involvement of nursing home residents and their representatives, nursing home physicians, nursing homes' boards of directors, and scientists and saw this as a prerequisite for a trustworthy data governance framework. For the Registry, involvement of these groups can be achieved through a procedure in which residents can provide their consent or objection to the reuse of the data, transparency about the decisions made, and providing them a position in a governing body. In addition, a data request approval procedure based on predefined assessment criteria indicates that data reuse by third parties aligns with the aims of the Registry, benefits the nursing home sector, and protects the privacy of data subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

The stakeholders' views, expertise, and knowledge of other frameworks and relevant legislation serve to inform the application of governance principles to the contexts of both the nursing home sector and the Netherlands. Many different stakeholders were involved in the development of the Registry Learning from Data in Nursing Homes' governance framework and will continue to be involved. Engagement of the full range of stakeholders in an early stage of governance framework development is important to generate trust in appropriate and responsible data reuse.

摘要

背景

在养老院领域,对电子健康记录(EHR)中常规记录的数据进行知识开发和质量改进的再利用仍处于起步阶段。患者和养老院是否决定为这些目的共享 EHR 数据,关键在于对适当和负责任的再利用的信任。数据治理框架确定谁可以访问数据、在什么条件下以及出于什么目的访问数据。这有助于获得这种信任。尽管医疗保健领域越来越关注数据治理,但关于实践中数据治理框架的开发和实施几乎没有指导。

目的

本研究旨在描述一个治理框架的开发过程,该治理框架用于“养老院数据学习注册中心”,这是一个针对养老院医生(荷兰语:specialist ouderengeneeskunde)提供的护理 EHR 数据的全国性注册中心,以便对数据进行再利用,用于研究和护理质量改进。

方法

确定了代表养老院领域实践、政策和研究的相关利益相关者。对来自 14 个利益相关者组织的 20 人进行了半结构化访谈。访谈的主要目的是探讨利益相关者对注册中心目标、数据访问标准以及管理机构任务和组成的看法。访谈主题和分析以文献中描述的 8 项关于健康数据再利用的治理原则为指导。访谈结果,以及来自注册中心联盟合作伙伴的法律建议和共识讨论,被用于塑造治理框架的规则、法规和管理机构。

结果

利益相关者重视养老院居民及其代表、养老院医生、养老院董事会以及科学家的参与,并将其视为值得信赖的数据治理框架的前提。对于注册中心来说,可以通过一个程序来实现这些群体的参与,即居民可以对数据的再利用表示同意或反对,对所做的决策保持透明,并在管理机构中为他们提供一个职位。此外,基于预设评估标准的数据请求审批程序表明,第三方对数据的再利用符合注册中心的目标,有利于养老院行业,并保护数据主体的隐私。

结论

利益相关者的意见、专业知识以及对其他框架和相关法规的了解,为将治理原则应用于养老院领域和荷兰的情况提供了信息。许多不同的利益相关者参与了“养老院数据学习注册中心”治理框架的开发,并将继续参与。在治理框架的早期阶段让所有利益相关者参与进来,对于建立对适当和负责任的数据再利用的信任非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f15/9909520/54dbeec4f52e/jmir_v25i1e38929_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f15/9909520/54dbeec4f52e/jmir_v25i1e38929_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f15/9909520/54dbeec4f52e/jmir_v25i1e38929_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Setting up a Governance Framework for Secondary Use of Routine Health Data in Nursing Homes: Development Study Using Qualitative Interviews.为养老院常规健康数据的二次利用建立治理框架:使用定性访谈的开发研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 25;25:e38929. doi: 10.2196/38929.
2
Kenyan health stakeholder views on individual consent, general notification and governance processes for the re-use of hospital inpatient data to support learning on healthcare systems.肯尼亚卫生利益相关者对重新使用医院住院数据以支持医疗系统学习的个人同意、一般通知和治理流程的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jan 8;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0343-9.
3
4
5
Relationships, expertise, incentives, and governance: supporting care home residents' access to health care. An interview study from England.关系、专业知识、激励措施与治理:支持养老院居民获得医疗保健。一项来自英国的访谈研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 May 1;16(5):427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.072. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
6
Care home services at the vanguard: a qualitative study exploring stakeholder views on the development and evaluation of novel, integrated approaches to enhancing healthcare in care homes.处于前沿的养老院服务:一项定性研究,探讨利益相关者对新型综合方法的开发与评估的看法,该方法旨在改善养老院的医疗保健服务。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 25;8(3):e017419. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017419.
7
8
9
Staff perspectives on the usability of electronic patient records for planning and delivering dementia care in nursing homes: a multiple case study.工作人员对电子病历在养老院规划和提供痴呆症护理的可用性的看法:一项多案例研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01160-8.
10
"A Question of Trust" and "a Leap of Faith"-Study Participants' Perspectives on Consent, Privacy, and Trust in Smart Home Research: Qualitative Study.《信任的问题》和《信仰的飞跃》——智能家居研究中参与者对同意、隐私和信任的看法:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 26;9(11):e25227. doi: 10.2196/25227.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Literature on Data Governance in the Health Care of Older Persons: Scoping Review.探索老年人医疗保健数据治理相关文献:范围综述
JMIR Aging. 2025 Jun 27;8:e73625. doi: 10.2196/73625.
2
Ethical and legal considerations governing use of health data for quality improvement and performance management: a scoping review of the perspectives of health professionals and administrators.关于将健康数据用于质量改进和绩效管理的伦理与法律考量:对卫生专业人员和管理人员观点的范围界定审查
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Apr 17;14(2):e003309. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003309.

本文引用的文献

1
Consensus Statement on Public Involvement and Engagement with Data Intensive Health Research.关于公众参与和参与数据密集型健康研究的共识声明。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2019 Feb 12;4(1):586. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.586.
2
Closing the UK care home data gap - methodological challenges and solutions.弥合英国养老院数据缺口——方法学挑战与解决方案
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2021 May 12;5(4):1391. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i4.1391.
3
A systematic literature review of attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on consent.
关于对卫生行政和临床试验数据二次使用与共享态度的系统文献综述:以同意为重点。
Syst Rev. 2021 May 4;10(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01663-z.
4
What can data trusts for health research learn from participatory governance in biobanks?健康研究的数据信托可以从生物库的参与式治理中学到什么?
J Med Ethics. 2022 May;48(5):323-328. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107020. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
5
The Academic Viewpoint on Patient Data Ownership in the Context of Big Data: Scoping Review.大数据背景下患者数据所有权的学术观点:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 18;22(8):e22214. doi: 10.2196/22214.
6
Learning health care systems: Highly needed but challenging.学习型医疗保健系统:急需但具有挑战性。
Learn Health Syst. 2020 Jan 13;4(3):e10211. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10211. eCollection 2020 Jul.
7
An Analysis of the Learning Health System in Its First Decade in Practice: Scoping Review.实践首个十年的学习型健康系统分析:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 19;22(3):e17026. doi: 10.2196/17026.
8
New Horizons in the use of routine data for ageing research.利用常规数据进行老龄化研究的新视野。
Age Ageing. 2020 Aug 24;49(5):716-722. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa018.
9
How should we think about clinical data ownership?我们应该如何看待临床数据所有权?
J Med Ethics. 2020 May;46(5):289-294. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105340. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
10
Patients' and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence.患者和公众对健康数据用于研究的看法和态度:实证证据的叙述性综述。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Jan;48(1):3-13. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105651. Epub 2019 Nov 12.