• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作人员对电子病历在养老院规划和提供痴呆症护理的可用性的看法:一项多案例研究。

Staff perspectives on the usability of electronic patient records for planning and delivering dementia care in nursing homes: a multiple case study.

机构信息

Centre of Expertise in Longevity and Long-Term Care, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01160-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-020-01160-8
PMID:32660474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7359585/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The electronic patient record (EPR) has been introduced into nursing homes in order to facilitate documentation practices such as assessment and care planning, which play an integral role in the provision of dementia care. However, little is known about how the EPR facilitates or hinders these practices from the end-user's perspective. Therefore, the objective of this qualitative study was to explore the usability issues associated with the EPR for assessment and care planning for people with dementia in nursing homes from a staff perspective.

METHODS

An exploratory, qualitative research design with a multiple case study approach was used. Contextual Inquiry was carried out with a variety of staff members (n = 21) who used the EPR in three nursing homes situated in Belgium, Czech Republic and Spain. Thematic analysis was used to code interview data, with codes then sorted into a priori components of the Health Information Technology Evaluation Framework: device, software functionality, organisational support. Two additional themes, structure and content, were also added.

RESULTS

Staff provided numerous examples of the ways in which EPR systems are facilitating and hindering assessment and care planning under each component, particularly for people with dementia, who may have more complex needs in comparison to other residents. The way in which EPR systems were not customisable was a common theme across all three homes. A comparison of organisational policies and practices revealed the importance of training, system support, and access, which may be linked with the successful adoption of the EPR system in nursing homes.

CONCLUSIONS

EPR systems introduced into the nursing home environment should be customisable and reflect best practice guidelines for dementia care, which may lead to improved outcomes and quality of life for people with dementia living in nursing homes. All levels of nursing home staff should be consulted during the development, implementation and evaluation of EPR systems as part of an iterative, user-centred design process.

摘要

背景

为了方便评估和护理计划等文档记录实践,电子病历(EPR)已在养老院中引入,这些实践在提供痴呆症护理方面起着至关重要的作用。然而,从最终用户的角度来看,EPR 如何促进或阻碍这些实践,我们知之甚少。因此,本定性研究的目的是从员工的角度探讨与养老院中痴呆症患者的评估和护理计划相关的 EPR 使用问题。

方法

采用探索性、定性研究设计和多案例研究方法。在比利时、捷克共和国和西班牙的三家养老院中,对使用 EPR 的各种员工(n=21)进行了情境调查。使用主题分析法对访谈数据进行编码,然后将代码分类为健康信息技术评估框架的先验组件:设备、软件功能、组织支持。此外,还添加了两个额外的主题,即结构和内容。

结果

员工提供了许多 EPR 系统在每个组件下促进和阻碍评估和护理计划的方式的例子,特别是对于痴呆症患者,他们可能比其他居民有更复杂的需求。EPR 系统不可定制是这三个养老院的共同主题。对组织政策和实践的比较揭示了培训、系统支持和访问的重要性,这可能与 EPR 系统在养老院中的成功采用有关。

结论

引入养老院环境的 EPR 系统应该是可定制的,并反映痴呆症护理的最佳实践指南,这可能会提高养老院中痴呆症患者的生活质量和生活质量。应在 EPR 系统的开发、实施和评估过程中咨询养老院各级员工,作为迭代的、以用户为中心的设计过程的一部分。

相似文献

1
Staff perspectives on the usability of electronic patient records for planning and delivering dementia care in nursing homes: a multiple case study.工作人员对电子病历在养老院规划和提供痴呆症护理的可用性的看法:一项多案例研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01160-8.
2
Electronic patient records as a tool to facilitate care provision in nursing homes: an integrative review.电子病历作为养老院提供护理服务的工具:一项综合评价。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2019 Sep;44(3):262-277. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2018.1496091. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
3
Staff experiences with implementing a case conferencing care model in nursing homes: a focus group study.养老院工作人员实施病例会诊护理模式的经验:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 27;19(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4034-0.
4
A family carer decision support intervention for people with advanced dementia residing in a nursing home: a study protocol for an international advance care planning intervention (mySupport study).针对居住在养老院的晚期痴呆症患者的家庭护理决策支持干预措施:一项国际预先护理计划干预研究方案(mySupport 研究)。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):822. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03533-2.
5
Nursing home staff's perceptions of barriers and needs in implementing person-centred care for people living with dementia: A qualitative study.养老院工作人员对实施以痴呆患者为中心的护理的障碍和需求的看法:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jul;31(13-14):1896-1906. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15729. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
6
DEMDATA: The Austrian-Czech institutional long term care project - design and protocol of a two-centre cross sectional study.DEMDATA:奥地利-捷克机构长期护理项目——一项两中心横断面研究的设计与方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 20;17(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2244-x.
7
An ethnographic study of strategies to support discussions with family members on end-of-life care for people with advanced dementia in nursing homes.一项关于在养老院中支持与家庭成员就晚期痴呆症患者临终关怀问题进行讨论的策略的人种志研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jul 7;15:55. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0127-2.
8
Reducing unplanned hospital admissions from care homes: a systematic review.减少养老院的非计划性住院:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(18):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KLPW6338.
9
Process evaluation of an implementation study in dementia care (EIT-4-BPSD): stakeholder perspectives.实施研究在痴呆症护理中的过程评估(EIT-4-BPSD):利益相关者的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 23;21(1):1006. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07001-2.
10
Evaluation of the 'Ladder to the Moon, Culture Change Studio Engagement Programme' staff training: Two quasi-experimental case studies.评价“月亮梯,文化变革工作室参与计划”员工培训:两项准实验案例研究。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2017 Sep;12(3). doi: 10.1111/opn.12147. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificially intelligent nursing homes: a scoping review of palliative care interventions.人工智能养老院:姑息治疗干预措施的范围综述
Front Digit Health. 2025 Feb 11;7:1484304. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1484304. eCollection 2025.
2
Best Practices for Implementing Electronic Care Records in Adult Social Care: Rapid Scoping Review.在成人社会护理中实施电子护理记录的最佳实践:快速范围审查。
JMIR Aging. 2025 Feb 14;8:e60107. doi: 10.2196/60107.
3
Assessing the feasibility of measuring residents' quality of life in English care homes and the construct validity and internal consistency of measures completed by staff proxy: a cross-sectional study.评估在英国养老院测量居民生活质量的可行性以及工作人员代理完成的测量工具的结构效度和内部一致性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 29;15(1):e090684. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090684.
4
Using co-design to understand consumer's health information-seeking behaviours and design preferences for a new digital clinical dashboard in aged care.运用协同设计来了解消费者在老年护理中寻求健康信息的行为以及对新型数字临床仪表盘的设计偏好。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):993. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05581-2.
5
What engagement strategies are useful in facilitating the implementation of electronic health records in health care settings? A rapid review of qualitative evidence synthesis using the normalization process theory.哪些参与策略有助于在医疗机构中推动电子健康记录的实施?运用常态化过程理论对定性证据综合进行的快速回顾。
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 3;10:20552076241291286. doi: 10.1177/20552076241291286. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
The acceptability and effectiveness of eHealth interventions to support assessment and decision-making for people with dementia living in care homes: A systematic review.电子健康干预措施对护理院中痴呆患者评估和决策支持的可接受性与有效性:一项系统综述
Front Dement. 2022 Sep 13;1:977561. doi: 10.3389/frdem.2022.977561. eCollection 2022.
7
Factors impacting clinical data and documentation quality in Australian aged care and disability services: a user-centred perspective.影响澳大利亚老年护理和残疾服务临床数据和文档质量的因素:以用户为中心的视角。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04899-1.
8
Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review.老年护理中临床仪表板的可用性与可接受性:系统评价
JMIR Aging. 2023 Jun 19;6:e42274. doi: 10.2196/42274.
9
Workflow interruption and nurses' mental workload in electronic health record tasks: An observational study.电子健康记录任务中的工作流程中断与护士的心理工作量:一项观察性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Mar 9;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01209-9.
10
Optimizing the Quality of Clinical Data in an Australian Aged Care and Disability Service to Improve Care Delivery and Clinical Outcomes: Protocol for an Agile Lean Six Sigma Study.优化澳大利亚老年护理和残疾服务中的临床数据质量以改善护理服务提供和临床结果:敏捷精益六西格玛研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 27;12:e39967. doi: 10.2196/39967.

本文引用的文献

1
Legal challenges for the implementation of advanced clinical digital decision support systems in Europe.欧洲先进临床数字决策支持系统实施中的法律挑战。
J Clin Transl Res. 2018 Aug 18;3(Suppl 3):424-430. eCollection 2018 Dec 17.
2
Electronic patient records as a tool to facilitate care provision in nursing homes: an integrative review.电子病历作为养老院提供护理服务的工具:一项综合评价。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2019 Sep;44(3):262-277. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2018.1496091. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
3
What is a case study?什么是案例研究?
Evid Based Nurs. 2018 Jan;21(1):7-8. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102845. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
4
EHRs: The Challenge of Making Electronic Data Usable and Interoperable.电子健康记录:使电子数据可用且可互操作面临的挑战。
P T. 2017 Sep;42(9):572-575.
5
Evaluation of Health Information Technology - Key Elements in the Framework.健康信息技术评估——框架中的关键要素。
J Nurs Res. 2016 Dec;24(4):283-285. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000192.
6
Developing nursing care plans.制定护理计划。
Nurs Stand. 2016 Feb 24;30(26):51-7; quiz 60. doi: 10.7748/ns.30.26.51.s48.
7
Measuring interoperable EHR adoption and maturity: a Canadian example.衡量可互操作电子健康记录的采用情况与成熟度:以加拿大为例。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jan 25;16:8. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0247-x.
8
Electronic Health Records in Long-Term Care: Staff Perspectives.长期护理中的电子健康记录:工作人员观点
J Appl Gerontol. 2017 Oct;36(10):1175-1196. doi: 10.1177/0733464815608493. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
9
Health Information Technology Evaluation Framework (HITREF) Comprehensiveness as Assessed in Electronic Point-of-Care Documentation Systems Evaluations.电子护理点文档系统评估中所评估的健康信息技术评估框架(HITREF)的全面性
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:406-9.
10
Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.电子健康记录可用性:对十一家电子健康记录供应商以用户为中心的设计过程的分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Nov;22(6):1179-82. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv050. Epub 2015 Jun 6.