• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人群间疫苗分配策略的比较性能及其在新发传染病中的应用。

Comparative performance of between-population vaccine allocation strategies with applications for emerging pandemics.

机构信息

Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 02115 Boston, MA, USA.

Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 02115 Boston, MA, USA; Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Vassar College, 12604 Poughkeepsie, NY, USA.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2023 Mar 10;41(11):1864-1874. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.053. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.053
PMID:36697312
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10075509/
Abstract

Vaccine allocation decisions during emerging pandemics have proven to be challenging due to competing ethical, practical, and political considerations. Complicating decision making, policy makers need to consider vaccine allocation strategies that balance needs both within and between populations. When vaccine stockpiles are limited, doses should be allocated in locations to maximize their impact. Using a susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered (SEIR) model we examine optimal vaccine allocation decisions across two populations considering the impact of characteristics of the population (e.g., size, underlying immunity, heterogeneous risk structure, interaction), vaccine (e.g., vaccine efficacy), pathogen (e.g., transmissibility), and delivery (e.g., varying speed and timing of rollout). Across a wide range of characteristics considered, we find that vaccine allocation proportional to population size (i.e., pro-rata allocation) performs either better or comparably to nonproportional allocation strategies in minimizing the cumulative number of infections. These results may argue in favor of sharing of vaccines between locations in the context of an epidemic caused by an emerging pathogen, where many epidemiologic characteristics may not be known.

摘要

在新发传染病大流行期间,疫苗分配决策因相互竞争的伦理、实际和政治考虑而变得极具挑战性。由于决策者需要考虑在人群内部和人群之间平衡需求的疫苗分配策略,这使得决策变得更加复杂。当疫苗库存有限时,应在能够最大程度发挥其影响的地方分配疫苗剂量。我们使用易感染-暴露-感染-恢复(SEIR)模型,在考虑人口特征(例如,规模、基础免疫力、异质风险结构、相互作用)、疫苗(例如,疫苗效力)、病原体(例如,传染性)和疫苗接种(例如,推出速度和时间的差异)的影响的情况下,研究了两个群体之间的最佳疫苗分配决策。在考虑的各种特征中,我们发现,疫苗分配与人口规模成正比(即按比例分配),在最大限度地减少累积感染人数方面,其表现要么优于非比例分配策略,要么与非比例分配策略相当。这些结果可能支持在新兴病原体引发的传染病流行期间,在多个地点之间共享疫苗,因为在这种情况下,许多流行病学特征可能并不清楚。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b57/10075509/f8332fe36059/nihms-1869722-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b57/10075509/e81a6b1b0078/nihms-1869722-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b57/10075509/3e2660708f3c/nihms-1869722-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b57/10075509/fda5132c1c6a/nihms-1869722-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b57/10075509/8eb278cbc326/nihms-1869722-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b57/10075509/f8332fe36059/nihms-1869722-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b57/10075509/e81a6b1b0078/nihms-1869722-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b57/10075509/3e2660708f3c/nihms-1869722-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b57/10075509/fda5132c1c6a/nihms-1869722-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b57/10075509/8eb278cbc326/nihms-1869722-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b57/10075509/f8332fe36059/nihms-1869722-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative performance of between-population vaccine allocation strategies with applications for emerging pandemics.人群间疫苗分配策略的比较性能及其在新发传染病中的应用。
Vaccine. 2023 Mar 10;41(11):1864-1874. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.053. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
2
Comparative performance of between-population vaccine allocation strategies with applications for emerging pandemics.群体间疫苗分配策略在新发大流行中的应用及比较性能
medRxiv. 2022 Jul 13:2021.06.18.21259137. doi: 10.1101/2021.06.18.21259137.
3
Comparison of health-oriented cross-regional allocation strategies for the COVID-19 vaccine: a mathematical modelling study.面向健康的 COVID-19 疫苗跨区域分配策略比较:一项数学建模研究。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):941-952. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2060522.
4
Constructing an ethical framework for priority allocation of pandemic vaccines.构建大流行疫苗优先分配的伦理框架。
Vaccine. 2021 Jan 29;39(5):797-804. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.053. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
5
Optimizing two-dose vaccine resource allocation to combat a pandemic in the context of limited supply: The case of COVID-19.优化两剂疫苗资源分配以应对有限供应情况下的大流行:以 COVID-19 为例。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 24;11:1129183. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1129183. eCollection 2023.
6
Multi-feature SEIR model for epidemic analysis and vaccine prioritization.多特征 SEIR 模型在传染病分析和疫苗优先级排序中的应用。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 1;19(3):e0298932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298932. eCollection 2024.
7
A novel mathematical model for prioritization of individuals to receive vaccine considering governmental health protocols.一种考虑政府卫生协议的新型数学模型,用于确定优先接种疫苗的个体。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Jun;24(4):633-646. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01491-5. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
8
Sequential allocation of vaccine to control an infectious disease.疫苗的序贯分配以控制传染病。
Math Biosci. 2022 Sep;351:108879. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2022.108879. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
9
Optimal spatial evaluation of a pro rata vaccine distribution rule for COVID-19.最优的 COVID-19 按比例疫苗分配规则的空间评估。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 7;13(1):2194. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28697-8.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Balancing fairness and efficiency in dynamic vaccine allocation during major infectious disease outbreaks.重大传染病疫情期间动态疫苗分配中公平与效率的平衡
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):1371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84027-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study.全球首例 COVID-19 疫苗接种一年的影响:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Sep;22(9):1293-1302. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00320-6. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
2
Seroprevalence of Infection-Induced SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies - United States, September 2021-February 2022.血清抗体阳性率:美国,2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 2 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Apr 29;71(17):606-608. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7117e3.
3
Evaluation of the United States COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy.
评估美国 COVID-19 疫苗分配策略。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 17;16(11):e0259700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259700. eCollection 2021.
4
Resource allocation for different types of vaccines against COVID-19: Tradeoffs and synergies between efficacy and reach.针对2019冠状病毒病的不同类型疫苗的资源分配:效力与可及性之间的权衡与协同效应
Vaccine. 2021 Nov 16;39(47):6876-6882. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.025. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
5
A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations.一个全球 COVID-19 疫苗接种数据库。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jul;5(7):947-953. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01122-8. Epub 2021 May 10.
6
Modelling optimal vaccination strategy for SARS-CoV-2 in the UK.在英国建立 SARS-CoV-2 的最佳疫苗接种策略模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 May 6;17(5):e1008849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008849. eCollection 2021 May.
7
Dynamic prioritization of COVID-19 vaccines when social distancing is limited for essential workers.在社交距离对基本工人有限时,对 COVID-19 疫苗进行动态优先级排序。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 20;118(16). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2025786118.
8
Vaccine optimization for COVID-19: Who to vaccinate first?2019冠状病毒病疫苗优化:优先接种对象为谁?
Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 3;7(6). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1374. Print 2020 Feb.
9
Age groups that sustain resurging COVID-19 epidemics in the United States.美国再次出现 COVID-19 疫情的年龄段。
Science. 2021 Mar 26;371(6536). doi: 10.1126/science.abe8372. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
10
Model-informed COVID-19 vaccine prioritization strategies by age and serostatus.基于模型的 COVID-19 疫苗优先接种策略,按年龄和血清学状态分层。
Science. 2021 Feb 26;371(6532):916-921. doi: 10.1126/science.abe6959. Epub 2021 Jan 21.