Zhu Lin, Peng Mingyao, Jiang Luyan, Wang Zhonghua
School of Health Policy & Management, Nanjing Medical University, 211166, Nanjing, China.
Public Health Policy and Management Innovation Research Group, Nanjing Medical University, 211166, Nanjing, China.
Arch Public Health. 2023 Jan 25;81(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-01010-1.
The inequality caused by circumstances is known as "inequality of opportunity" (IOp). Many scholars have studied IOp in the health field, but few studies have quantified contributors to the IOp of health service utilization among middle-aged and elderly people. This study measured the IOp of health service utilization and decomposed the contributors to IOp present among Chinese middle-aged and elderly people.
Data were obtained from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) in 2013, 2015 and 2018. A mean-based regression method was adopted to measure the IOp of health service utilization. Shapley-Shorrocks decomposition was used to analyze the main contributors to IOp seen among the middle-aged and elderly.
Although the absolute IOp of health service utilization decreased over time, IOp still explains the total inequality to a large extent. The absolute IOp and relative IOp were greatest in the areas of self-treatment and inpatient care utilization, respectively. Shapley decomposition results showed that the out-of-pocket (OOP) ratio contributed most to the IOp of outpatient care utilization; and the residence area highly explains the IOp of inpatient service utilization. Meanwhile, social and economic factors such as work status and income contribute more to the IOp of inpatient care utilization than outpatient and self-treatment.
Strategies aimed at achieving equal opportunities remain necessary to ensure the fairness of health service utilization. Policies and measures should further adjust the medical insurance compensation policies, and pay more attention to the middle-aged and elderly residents in rural areas, optimize health resource allocation, improve the social security systems, and narrow the socioeconomic gap between urban and rural areas in China.
由环境导致的不平等被称为“机会不平等”(IOp)。许多学者在健康领域研究了机会不平等,但很少有研究对中老年人健康服务利用机会不平等的影响因素进行量化。本研究测量了中国中老年人健康服务利用的机会不平等,并对其影响因素进行了分解。
数据来源于2013年、2015年和2018年的中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)。采用基于均值的回归方法测量健康服务利用的机会不平等。使用夏普里-肖罗克斯分解法分析中老年人机会不平等的主要影响因素。
尽管健康服务利用的绝对机会不平等随时间下降,但机会不平等在很大程度上仍解释了总体不平等。自我治疗和住院服务利用方面的绝对机会不平等和相对机会不平等分别最大。夏普里分解结果表明,自付比例对门诊服务利用机会不平等的贡献最大;居住地区高度解释了住院服务利用的机会不平等。同时,工作状态和收入等社会经济因素对住院服务利用机会不平等的贡献大于门诊和自我治疗。
旨在实现机会平等的策略对于确保健康服务利用的公平性仍然是必要的。政策和措施应进一步调整医疗保险补偿政策,更加关注农村地区的中老年人居民,优化卫生资源配置,完善社会保障体系,缩小中国城乡之间的社会经济差距。