De Sio Fabio, Imperadore Pamela
Heinrich Heine Universität, Institut für Geschichte, Theorie und Ethik der Medizin, Centre for Health and Society, Medizinische Fakultät, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Department of Biology and Evolution of Marine Organisms, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Napoli, Italy.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023 Jan 9;10:1072382. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1072382. eCollection 2022.
The advent of marine stations in the last quarter of the 19th Century has given biologists the possibility of observing and experimenting upon myriad marine organisms. Among them, cephalopod mollusks have attracted great attention from the onset, thanks to their remarkable adaptability to captivity and a great number of biologically unique features including a sophisticate behavioral repertoire, remarkable body patterning capacities under direct neural control and the complexity of nervous system rivalling vertebrates. Surprisingly, the capacity to regenerate tissues and complex structures, such as appendages, albeit been known for centuries, has been understudied over the decades. Here, we will first review the limited in number, but fundamental studies on the subject published between 1920 and 1970 and discuss what they added to our knowledge of regeneration as a biological phenomenon. We will also speculate on how these relate to their epistemic and disciplinary context, setting the base for the study of regeneration in the taxon. We will then frame the peripherality of cephalopods in regeneration studies in relation with their experimental accessibility, and in comparison, with established models, either simpler (such as planarians), or more promising in terms of translation (urodeles). Last, we will explore the potential and growing relevance of cephalopods as prospective models of regeneration today, in the light of the novel opportunities provided by technological and methodological advances, to reconsider old problems and explore new ones. The recent development of cutting-edge technologies made available for cephalopods, like genome editing, is allowing for a number of important findings and opening the way toward new promising avenues. The contribution offered by cephalopods will increase our knowledge on regenerative mechanisms through cross-species comparison and will lead to a better understanding of the complex cellular and molecular machinery involved, shedding a light on the common pathways but also on the novel strategies different taxa evolved to promote regeneration of tissues and organs. Through the dialogue between biological/experimental and historical/contextual perspectives, this article will stimulate a discussion around the changing relations between availability of animal models and their specificity, technical and methodological developments and scientific trends in contemporary biology and medicine.
19世纪最后25年海洋研究站的出现,使生物学家有机会对无数海洋生物进行观察和实验。其中,头足类软体动物从一开始就备受关注,这得益于它们对圈养环境的显著适应性以及众多独特的生物学特征,包括复杂的行为模式、在直接神经控制下显著的身体图案形成能力以及堪比脊椎动物的神经系统复杂性。令人惊讶的是,尽管头足类动物的组织和复杂结构(如附肢)的再生能力几个世纪以来已为人所知,但在过去几十年中却未得到充分研究。在此,我们首先回顾1920年至1970年间发表的数量有限但具有基础性的相关研究,并讨论这些研究对我们作为一种生物学现象的再生知识有何补充。我们还将推测这些研究如何与它们的认知和学科背景相关联,为该分类群的再生研究奠定基础。然后,我们将根据头足类动物在实验上的可及性,并与已确立的模型(无论是更简单的模型,如涡虫,还是在转化方面更有前景的模型,如蝾螈)进行比较,来阐述头足类动物在再生研究中的边缘性。最后,鉴于技术和方法进步带来的新机遇,我们将探讨头足类动物作为当今再生研究潜在模型的潜力及日益增长的相关性,以重新审视旧问题并探索新问题。为头足类动物提供的前沿技术(如基因组编辑)的最新发展,正在促成一些重要发现,并为新的有前景的研究途径开辟道路。头足类动物的贡献将通过跨物种比较增加我们对再生机制的了解,并有助于更好地理解其中涉及的复杂细胞和分子机制,揭示共同途径以及不同分类群为促进组织和器官再生而进化出的新策略。通过生物学/实验视角与历史/背景视角之间的对话,本文将激发围绕动物模型的可用性与其特异性、技术和方法发展以及当代生物学和医学中的科学趋势之间不断变化的关系展开讨论。