Chiu Jing Hua, Chong Kwek Yan, Lum Shawn K Y, Wardle David A
Asian School of the Environment Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore.
Singapore Botanic Gardens National Parks Board Singapore Singapore.
Ecol Evol. 2023 Jan 18;13(1):e9690. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9690. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Invasive plants are a growing ecological problem worldwide, but biases and patterns within invasive plant research may affect our understanding of invasive plant ecology. In this study, we analyzed 458 invasive plant papers sampled from the two journals dedicated entirely to the field of invasion biology, i.e., and . From these papers, we collected information on geographic coverage, climate, habitat, taxonomic coverage, plant functional type, and research topic to examine trends across a 21-year time period from 1999 to 2020. Our analysis found that invasive plant research was consistently biased toward temperate grassland and forest ecosystems particularly within the Americas, Europe, and Australia, and toward smaller, herbaceous invasive plant species (i.e., forbs, grasses, and shrubs), with an increase in interest in invasive nitrogen-fixing legumes over time. Our analysis also identified "hot" research topics in invasive plant research at specific time periods, such as a peak in the use of genetic analysis methods in 2014-2015 and a more recent focus on plant physiological and functional traits. While current models, concepts, and understanding of plant invasion ecology are still driven by such biases, this has been partially offset by recent increased research in understudied systems, as well as increasing awareness that plant invasion is heavily affected by their growth types, physiological traits, and soil interactions. As the field of invasion biology becomes ever increasingly important over time, focusing invasive plant research on understudied ecosystems and plant groups will allow us to develop a more holistic understanding of the ecology of invasive plants. In particular, given the outsized importance of the tropics to global biodiversity, the threats they face, and the dearth of studies, it is of critical importance that more invasive plant research is conducted within the tropics to develop a more globally representative understanding of invasive plant ecology.
入侵植物在全球范围内是一个日益严重的生态问题,但入侵植物研究中的偏差和模式可能会影响我们对入侵植物生态学的理解。在本研究中,我们分析了从两本完全专注于入侵生物学领域的期刊中抽取的458篇入侵植物相关论文,即《[期刊名1]》和《[期刊名2]》。从这些论文中,我们收集了有关地理覆盖范围、气候、栖息地、分类覆盖范围、植物功能类型和研究主题的信息,以研究1999年至2020年这21年期间的趋势。我们的分析发现,入侵植物研究一直偏向于温带草原和森林生态系统,特别是在美洲、欧洲和澳大利亚,并且偏向于较小的草本入侵植物物种(即草本植物、禾本科植物和灌木),随着时间的推移,对入侵性固氮豆科植物的兴趣有所增加。我们的分析还确定了入侵植物研究在特定时间段的“热门”研究主题,例如2014 - 2015年遗传分析方法使用的高峰期以及最近对植物生理和功能性状的关注。虽然目前植物入侵生态学的模型、概念和理解仍然受到此类偏差的驱动,但最近对研究不足的系统的研究增加,以及人们越来越意识到植物入侵受到其生长类型、生理性状和土壤相互作用的严重影响,这在一定程度上抵消了这种偏差。随着入侵生物学领域随着时间的推移变得越来越重要,将入侵植物研究重点放在研究不足的生态系统和植物群体上,将使我们能够对入侵植物的生态学有更全面的理解。特别是,鉴于热带地区对全球生物多样性的巨大重要性、它们面临的威胁以及研究的匮乏,在热带地区开展更多的入侵植物研究对于形成更具全球代表性的入侵植物生态学理解至关重要。