Marino Clara, Leroy Boris, Latombe Guillaume, Bellard Céline
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique et Evolution, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
FRB - CESAB, Montpellier, France.
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Dec;30(12):e17607. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17607.
While biological invasions continue to threaten biodiversity, most of current assessments focus on the sole exposure to invasive alien species (IAS), without considering native species' response to the threat. Here, we address this gap by assessing vertebrates' vulnerability to biological invasions, combining measures of both (i) exposure to 304 identified IAS and (ii) realized sensitivity of 1600 native vertebrates to this threat. We used the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species to identify species threatened by IAS, their distribution, and the species' range characteristics of their associated IAS. We found that 38% of worldwide terrestrial lands are exposed to biological invasions, but exposure alone was insufficient to assess vulnerability since we further found that most of the world hosted native species sensitive to biological invasions. We delineated areas highly vulnerable to biological invasions, that is, combining areas of high exposure and high sensitivity to IAS, located in Australia and coastal states of North America with a high confidence level, but also-depending on the group-in Pacific islands, Southern America, Western Europe, Southern Africa, Eastern Asia, and New-Zealand with a medium confidence level. Assessing the completeness in exposure data, we revealed strong biases in the global description of the well-known invasion hotspots, with limited areas being assessed with a medium to high confidence level. The completeness of sensitivity was overall very high, for the three studied taxonomic groups. We also demonstrated that coldspots of vulnerability to biological invasions were areas of low confidence in terms of data completeness, which coincided with biodiversity hotspots. There is thus a critical need to address these knowledge shortfalls which jeopardize efficient conservation initiatives, regarding the threats to well-known vertebrate taxa.
虽然生物入侵继续威胁生物多样性,但目前大多数评估仅关注对外来入侵物种(IAS)的单一接触,而未考虑本地物种对这种威胁的反应。在此,我们通过评估脊椎动物对生物入侵的脆弱性来填补这一空白,综合考量了以下两方面的指标:(i)对304种已识别的外来入侵物种的接触情况,以及(ii)1600种本地脊椎动物对这种威胁的实际敏感度。我们利用世界自然保护联盟(IUCN)濒危物种红色名录来确定受外来入侵物种威胁的物种、它们的分布以及相关外来入侵物种的分布范围特征。我们发现,全球38%的陆地面临生物入侵,但仅接触情况不足以评估脆弱性,因为我们进一步发现,世界上大部分地区都有对生物入侵敏感的本地物种。我们划定了极易受到生物入侵影响的区域,即高接触度和对入侵物种高敏感度相结合的区域,这些区域高度确定地位于澳大利亚和北美洲沿海各州,但依物种类别而定,中等确定地分布在太平洋岛屿、南美洲、西欧、南部非洲、东亚和新西兰。在评估接触数据的完整性时,我们发现全球对知名入侵热点地区的描述存在严重偏差,只有有限区域得到了中等至高度确定的评估。对于三个研究的分类类群,敏感度数据的完整性总体非常高。我们还证明,生物入侵脆弱性冷点地区在数据完整性方面置信度较低,而这些地区恰好与生物多样性热点地区重合。因此,迫切需要解决这些知识缺口,因为它们危及针对知名脊椎动物类群威胁的有效保护举措。