• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神心理数字健康干预措施在老年急诊患者中实施的障碍和促进因素:系统评价方案。

Barriers and facilitators to implementing psychosocial digital health interventions for older adults presenting to emergency departments: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Global and Women's Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Human Centred Computing, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 12;14(8):e085304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085304.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085304
PMID:39134431
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11331967/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Older adults can face challenges when seeking care from emergency departments (EDs) due to presenting with multiple comorbidities and non-specific symptoms. Psychosocial care is a possible target to help improve ED care for this population. It is possible that digital health technologies can be implemented within emergency settings to improve the provision of psychosocial care. However, it is unclear what the barriers and facilitators are to implementing digital psychosocial interventions for older adults presenting to the ED. Therefore, the scoping review aims to determine what are these barriers and facilitators.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The scoping review will be conducted in line with the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and will use the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. The databases Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Scopus will be searched. The search strategy will be developed in consultation with a specialist research librarian and will cover three key concepts: EDs, digital health technologies and older adults. Additionally, the first 100 hits of a Google Scholar search will be screened for inclusion. We will include both qualitative and quantitative studies that investigate ED digital interventions for psychosocial care where the primary focus is the views, attitudes, experiences and perceptions of patients, families and staff. After extracting all data, analysis and synthesis will follow the 'best-fit framework synthesis' approach and the Theoretical Domains Framework will be used to identify barriers and facilitators.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review since only publicly available data will be analysed and appraised. The findings of the scoping review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

摘要

简介

由于老年人常患有多种合并症且症状不典型,在前往急诊科就诊时可能会面临各种挑战。心理社会护理是改善该人群急诊护理的一个可能目标。在急诊环境中实施数字心理健康技术以改善心理社会护理的提供情况是可行的。但是,对于为前往急诊科就诊的老年人实施数字心理社会干预的障碍和促进因素尚不清楚。因此,本范围综述旨在确定这些障碍和促进因素。

方法和分析

本范围综述将根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的指南进行,并将使用《系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)清单》。将检索 Medline、Embase、PsycINFO 和 Scopus 数据库。检索策略将与专业研究图书馆员协商制定,将涵盖三个关键概念:急诊科、数字健康技术和老年人。此外,还将对 Google Scholar 搜索的前 100 个结果进行筛选,以纳入研究。我们将纳入调查急诊科数字干预心理社会护理的定性和定量研究,其主要重点是患者、家属和工作人员的观点、态度、经验和看法。在提取所有数据后,将根据“最佳拟合框架综合”方法进行分析和综合,并使用理论领域框架来确定障碍和促进因素。

伦理和传播

由于仅分析和评估公开可用的数据,因此本次范围综述不需要伦理批准。范围综述的结果将通过同行评审的出版物和会议报告进行传播。

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to implementing psychosocial digital health interventions for older adults presenting to emergency departments: a scoping review protocol.精神心理数字健康干预措施在老年急诊患者中实施的障碍和促进因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 12;14(8):e085304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085304.
2
Exploring Online Health Information Seeking Behaviour (OHISB) among young adults: A scoping review protocol.探索年轻人的在线健康信息搜索行为(OHISB):一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):e074894. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074894.
3
Digital health interventions and quality of home-based primary care for older adults: A scoping review protocol.数字健康干预措施和家庭初级保健老年人质量:范围综述方案。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;10:1022587. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022587. eCollection 2022.
4
Reporting quality of published reviews of commercial and publicly available mobile health apps (mHealth app reviews): a scoping review protocol.发表的商业和公开可用的移动健康应用程序(移动健康应用程序评论)的评论报告质量:范围综述协议。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 4;14(7):e083364. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083364.
5
Facilitators of and barriers to buprenorphine initiation for people with opioid use disorder in the emergency department: protocol for a scoping review.在急诊科为患有阿片类药物使用障碍的人启动丁丙诺啡的促进因素和障碍:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 27;11(9):e053207. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053207.
6
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.
7
Information and communication technology-based interventions for suicide prevention implemented in clinical settings: a scoping review protocol.基于信息和通信技术的预防自杀临床干预措施:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):e056232. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056232.
8
Facilitators and barriers to using smart TV among older adults in care settings: a scoping review protocol.在照护环境中使用智能电视的促进因素和障碍:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 8;12(7):e061446. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061446.
9
Co-design of Digital Health Interventions for Young Adults: Protocol for a Scoping Review.针对青年成年人的数字健康干预措施的协同设计:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Oct 24;11(10):e38635. doi: 10.2196/38635.
10
Facilitators and barriers to using AI-enabled robots with older adults in long-term care from staff perspective: a scoping review protocol.从工作人员角度来看,在长期护理中使用具有人工智能功能的机器人的促进因素和障碍:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 30;13(10):e075278. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075278.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to and Facilitators of Technology Adoption in Emergency Departments: A Comprehensive Review.急诊科技术应用的障碍与促进因素:一项综合综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 23;22(4):479. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040479.

本文引用的文献

1
Symptoms of depression and risk of emergency department visits among people aged 70 years and over.70岁及以上人群的抑郁症状与急诊科就诊风险
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17794-6.
2
Mobile Integrated Health Interventions for Older Adults: A Systematic Review.针对老年人的移动综合健康干预措施:一项系统综述。
Innov Aging. 2023 Mar 1;7(3):igad017. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad017. eCollection 2023.
3
Evaluating the Usability of an Emergency Department After Visit Summary: Staged Heuristic Evaluation.
评估急诊科就诊后总结的可用性:分阶段启发式评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Mar 9;10:e43729. doi: 10.2196/43729.
4
Digital health interventions for healthy ageing: a qualitative user evaluation and ethical assessment.数字健康干预措施促进健康老龄化:定性用户评估和伦理评估。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jul 2;21(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02338-z.
5
Healthy ageing through internet counselling in the elderly (HATICE): a multinational, randomised controlled trial.通过互联网咨询实现老年人健康老龄化(HATICE):一项多国家、随机对照试验。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Dec;1(8):e424-e434. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30153-0. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
6
Unplanned Hospital Care Use in Older Adults: The Role of Psychological and Social Well-Being.老年人非计划性住院治疗的使用:心理和社会健康的作用。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Feb;68(2):272-280. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16313. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
7
Acceptability of older patients' self-assessment in the Emergency Department (ACCEPTED)-a randomised cross-over pilot trial.老年患者在急诊科自我评估的可接受性(ACCEPTED)-一项随机交叉先导试验。
Age Ageing. 2019 Nov 1;48(6):875-880. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz084.
8
Emergency Department Interventions for Older Adults: A Systematic Review.急诊科干预老年人:系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1516-1525. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15854. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
9
Emergency department visits in older patients: a population-based survey.老年患者的急诊科就诊:一项基于人群的调查。
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Feb 27;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0236-3.
10
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.