Center for Health Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Center for Health Sciences, Postgraduate program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 31;12:1357688. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1357688. eCollection 2024.
Using digital health in primary health care (PHC) contributes to reducing costs and travel time, achieving global development goals, improving access, quality and longitudinality of care, and managing health crises. Its evaluation must go beyond the technical-operational aspects to include patient satisfaction, a key element in assessing the quality of care.
To identify and map patient satisfaction (expectations, desires, cultural values) about the adoption of digital health strategies and assess their impact on the quality of care in PHC.
The review will follow the recommendations proposed by the Joanna's Briggs Institute (JBI) manual, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the methodology proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al. and will be conducted in nine stages. The search will be conducted in health studies databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and BVS), gray literature, and preprint repositories (Google Scholar and MedRxiv). Two reviewers will select the studies, and the third will analyze possible conflicts. The inclusion criteria comprise studies that have been made available in their entirety, whether they are primary studies or short communications, as well as the following materials extracted from the gray literature: preprints, manuals, government documents, books, guidelines, theses and dissertations. Exclusion criteria include literature reviews, abstracts, books, conference archives, letters to the editor, duplicates and opinion articles. Data will be analyzed by content analysis and inferential statistics. This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) under DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/PUJDB.
The study aims to understand aspects related to the expectations, desires, and cultural values of patients from different countries, as well as the strengths and critical nodes of the use of digital health on the quality of care in PHC.
在初级医疗保健(PHC)中使用数字健康有助于降低成本和旅行时间,实现全球发展目标,改善医疗保健的可及性、质量和纵向性,并管理卫生危机。其评估必须超越技术操作层面,包括患者满意度,这是评估医疗保健质量的关键要素。
确定并绘制患者对采用数字健康策略的满意度(期望、愿望、文化价值观),并评估其对 PHC 中医疗质量的影响。
该综述将遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)手册、系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)以及 Arksey 和 O'Malley 以及 Levac 等人提出的方法的建议,并将分九个阶段进行。检索将在健康研究数据库(通过 PubMed 的 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 BVS)、灰色文献和预印本存储库(Google Scholar 和 MedRxiv)中进行。两名审查员将选择研究,第三名审查员将分析可能存在的争议。纳入标准包括已全部提供的研究,无论其是原始研究还是简短通讯,以及从灰色文献中提取的以下材料:预印本、手册、政府文件、书籍、指南、论文和学位论文。排除标准包括文献综述、摘要、书籍、会议档案、给编辑的信、重复和观点文章。数据将通过内容分析和推理统计进行分析。本方案在 Open Science Framework(OSF)上以 DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/PUJDB 注册。
该研究旨在了解来自不同国家的患者的期望、愿望和文化价值观相关方面,以及数字健康在 PHC 中对医疗质量的优势和关键节点。