Yang Min, Ta Na, Bai Xue, Wei Chengxi, Sun Chengshan, Han Chunjuan
Nursing College, Tongliao City Hospital, Tongliao, Inner Mongolia, China.
Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Mongolian Medicine Pharmacology for Cardio-Cerebral Vascular System, Tongliao, Inner Mongolia, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2023 Jan 16;2023:4689732. doi: 10.1155/2023/4689732. eCollection 2023.
This study aimed to examine the potential effectiveness of personalized nursing interventions on improving the heart-related quality of life of patients with CVDs versus an usual care.
A systematic review and meta-analysis. . The study researched the article between January 2011 and December 2021 from four electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science. . Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to personalized nursing in CVDs population were included. The main variables were analyzed by standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals and heterogeneity was used by the test and value.
Of 734 studies, fourteen articles were eligible for this study. Personalized nursing significantly improved the quality of life [SMD = 0.39, 95% CI (0.29, 0.49)] with obvious heterogeneity ( = 0.000, = 66.1%) which needs to be further subgroup analyzed. The nurse-led intervention was considered the main-related effect to influence the heterogeneity with value of 0.39 (I2 = 66.1%, = 0.000; Group 1: I2 = 48.4%, = 0.071, and Group 2: I2 = 0.0%,. In addition, related results of athletic ability and mental health and follow-up and education in the intervention had higher level of quality of life compared to the control group [SMD = 0.27, 95% CI (0.10, 0.44); SMD = 0.21, 95% CI (0.04, 0.37); SMD = 0.39, 95% CI (0.29, 0.49) and SMD = 0.28, 95% CI (0.11, 0.44)].
Effectiveness studies of personalized care focus on more relevant outcomes have higher health outcomes, whereas evidence of the effectiveness of personalized nursing approach is still limited. Therefore, more and more high-quality RCT are needed.
本研究旨在探讨个性化护理干预措施相较于常规护理,在改善心血管疾病(CVDs)患者心脏相关生活质量方面的潜在效果。
系统评价与荟萃分析。本研究检索了2011年1月至2021年12月期间来自四个电子数据库的文章:PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和科学网。纳入了与心血管疾病人群中个性化护理相关的随机对照试验(RCTs)。主要变量采用标准化均数差及95%置信区间进行分析,异质性采用 检验和 值进行评估。
在734项研究中,有14篇文章符合本研究的纳入标准。个性化护理显著改善了生活质量[标准化均数差(SMD)=0.39,95%置信区间(0.29,0.49)],存在明显异质性( =0.000, =66.1%),需要进一步进行亚组分析。以护士为主导的干预措施被认为是影响异质性的主要相关因素, 值为0.39(I2=66.1%, =0.000;第1组:I2=48.4%, =0.071,第2组:I2=0.0%)。此外,与对照组相比,干预组在运动能力、心理健康以及随访和教育方面的相关结果显示生活质量水平更高[标准化均数差(SMD)=0.27,95%置信区间(0.10,0.44);标准化均数差(SMD)=0.21,95%置信区间(0.04,0.37);标准化均数差(SMD)=0.39,95%置信区间(0.29,0.49)以及标准化均数差(SMD)=0.28,95%置信区间(0.11,0.44)]。
聚焦于更相关结局的个性化护理有效性研究具有更高的健康效益,然而个性化护理方法有效性的证据仍然有限。因此,需要越来越多高质量的随机对照试验。