• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区域负责任研究与创新中的翻译工具和指标。

Translating tools and indicators in territorial RRI.

作者信息

Völker Thomas, Mazzonetto Marzia, Slaattelid Rasmus, Strand Roger

机构信息

Centre for the Study of the Sciences and Humanities, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

BE Participation, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Jan 9;7:1038970. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.1038970. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/frma.2022.1038970
PMID:36700150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9868598/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

By a series of calls within the Horizon 2020 framework programme, the EU funded projects intended to deploy Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) at a territorial level, in regional research and innovation ecosystems. This paper presents efforts to document and evaluate the achievements in TRANSFORM, one of these projects.

METHODS

Evaluative inquiry and theoretical reasoning.

RESULTS

Noting the need for a general principle to be interpreted, adapted and translated in order to be rendered meaningful at a local level, we studied precisely these multiple territorial translations of RRI, the organizational and institutional orderings with which they co-emerge and the challenges that come with these translations. An important shared feature is that RRI work does not start from zero, but rather builds on pre-existing relationships and repertoires of collaboration. The RRI project is hence a way to continue ongoing work and follow pre-set purposes, aims and objectives, as a form of "maintenance work". In this very human sense, RRI is deployed with a logic of care in the regional context, while the Horizon 2020 calls and proposals above all are formulated in a logic of choice, to be assessed by indicators.

DISCUSSION

We warn against undue standardization of RRI by toolification and use of quantitative indicators, and recommend that RRI performance is monitored by methods of evaluative inquiry.

摘要

引言

通过“地平线2020”框架计划中的一系列呼吁,欧盟资助了一些项目,旨在在区域研究与创新生态系统的地域层面上部署负责任的研究与创新(RRI)。本文介绍了对其中一个项目“TRANSFORM”的成果进行记录和评估的工作。

方法

评估性探究与理论推理。

结果

注意到需要对一项通用原则进行解释、调整和转化,以便在地方层面上具有意义,我们精确研究了RRI在地域层面上的这些多重转化、与之共同出现的组织和制度秩序以及这些转化所带来的挑战。一个重要的共同特征是,RRI工作并非从零开始,而是建立在既有的关系和合作模式之上。因此,RRI项目是一种延续正在进行的工作并遵循预先设定的宗旨、目标和目的的方式,是一种“维护工作”形式。从这个非常人性化的意义上讲,RRI是在区域背景下以一种关怀逻辑来部署的,而“地平线2020”的呼吁和提案首先是按照一种选择逻辑制定的,要通过指标进行评估。

讨论

我们警告不要通过工具化和使用定量指标对RRI进行过度标准化,并建议通过评估性探究方法来监测RRI的绩效。

相似文献

1
Translating tools and indicators in territorial RRI.区域负责任研究与创新中的翻译工具和指标。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Jan 9;7:1038970. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.1038970. eCollection 2022.
2
Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences (STARBIOS2): Protocol for a Horizon 2020 Funded European Multicenter Project to Promote Responsible Research and Innovation.实现负责任生物科学的结构转型(STARBIOS2):一项由“地平线2020”资助的欧洲多中心项目促进负责任研究与创新的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 7;8(3):e11745. doi: 10.2196/11745.
3
Contextualizing Security Innovation: Responsible Research and Innovation at the Smart Border?语境化安全创新:智慧边境的负责任研究与创新?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Feb 18;27(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00292-y.
4
Building a responsible innovation toolkit as project legacy.构建一个负责任的创新工具包作为项目遗产。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Mar 13;8:1112106. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1112106. eCollection 2023.
5
Responsible research and innovation training programs: implementation and evaluation of the HEIRRI project.负责任的研究与创新培训项目:HEIRRI 项目的实施与评估
Forensic Sci Res. 2021 Nov 2;6(4):320-330. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2021.1970319. eCollection 2021.
6
Devices of Responsibility: Over a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation Initiatives for Nanotechnologies.责任装置:十余年纳米技术负责任研究与创新倡议
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Dec;24(6):1719-1746. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9978-z. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
7
Global indicators framework for socially responsible research and innovation (RRI): Aligning standards to monitor public and researcher perspectives with the UNESCO Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers.社会责任研究与创新(RRI)全球指标框架:使监测公众和研究人员观点的标准与教科文组织《关于科学和科研人员的建议》保持一致。
Open Res Eur. 2023 Aug 2;2:36. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14232.2. eCollection 2022.
8
A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.一个具有动员作用的概念?剖析负责任的研究与创新的学术表述
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):81-103. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9761-6. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
9
Responsibly shaping technology innovation for the energy transition: an RRI indicator system as a tool.为能源转型负责任地塑造技术创新:作为一种工具的负责任研究与创新(RRI)指标体系
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Jun 29;8:1157218. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1157218. eCollection 2023.
10
Linking policy and practice in monitoring socially responsible research and innovation (RRI): A conceptual framework to evaluate progress through the UNESCO-led Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers.在监测社会责任型研究与创新(RRI)中连接政策与实践:一个通过联合国教科文组织主导的《关于科学和科研人员的建议》来评估进展的概念框架。
Open Res Eur. 2023 Jul 24;2:21. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14263.2. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Responsibly shaping technology innovation for the energy transition: an RRI indicator system as a tool.为能源转型负责任地塑造技术创新:作为一种工具的负责任研究与创新(RRI)指标体系
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Jun 29;8:1157218. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1157218. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.负责任的研究与创新的定义和概念维度:文献综述
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
2
Understanding 'anticipatory governance'.理解“预期治理”。
Soc Stud Sci. 2014 Apr;44(2):218-42. doi: 10.1177/0306312713508669.
3
The politics of buzzwords at the interface of technoscience, market and society: the case of 'public engagement in science'.技术科学、市场和社会界面上的流行语政治:以“公众参与科学”为例。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Apr;23(3):238-53. doi: 10.1177/0963662513515371. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
4
Matters of care in technoscience: assembling neglected things.技术科学中的关怀问题:组装被忽视的事物。
Soc Stud Sci. 2011 Feb;41(1):85-106. doi: 10.1177/0306312710380301.
5
Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science--hitting the notes, but missing the music?公众参与作为恢复公众对科学信任的一种手段——是找准了音调,却没抓住旋律?
Community Genet. 2006;9(3):211-20. doi: 10.1159/000092659.