• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

i-FACTOR 肽增强骨移植物与自体骨移植治疗单节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的随机对照试验 6 年随访结果

Six-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of i-FACTOR Peptide-Enhanced Bone Graft Versus Local Autograft in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

机构信息

Carle Spine Institute, Urbana, Illinois, USA.

Department of Orthopaedics, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2023 Apr 1;92(4):725-733. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002290. Epub 2022 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000002290
PMID:36700705
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous analyses of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Investigational Device Exemption study demonstrated the superiority of i-FACTOR compared with local autograft bone in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) at 12 and 24 months postoperatively in a composite end point of overall success.

OBJECTIVE

To report the final, 6-year clinical and radiological outcomes of the FDA postapproval study.

METHODS

Of the original 319 subjects enrolled in the Investigational Device Exemption study, 220 participated in the postapproval study (106 i-FACTOR and 114 control).

RESULTS

The study met statistical noninferiority success for all 4 coprimary end points. Radiographic fusion was achieved in 99% (103/104) and 98.2% (109/111) in i-FACTOR and local autograft subjects, mean Neck Disability Index improvement from baseline was 28.6 (24.8, 32.3) in the i-FACTOR and 29.2 (25.6, 32.9) in the control group, respectively (noninferiority P < .0001). The neurological success rate at 6 years was 95.9% (70/73) in i-FACTOR subjects and 93.7% (70/75) in local autograft subjects (noninferiority P < .0001). Safety outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Secondary surgery on the same or different cervical levels occurred in 20/106 (18.9%) i-FACTOR subjects and 23/114 (20.2%) local autograft subjects ( P = .866). Secondary outcomes (pain, SF-36 physical component score and mental component score) in i-FACTOR subjects were similar to those in local autograft subjects.

CONCLUSION

i-FACTOR met all 4 FDA-mandated noninferiority success criteria and demonstrated safety and efficacy in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical radiculopathy through 6 years postoperatively. Safety outcomes are acceptable, and the clinical and functional outcomes observed at 12 and 24 months remained at 72 months.

摘要

背景

美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的一项研究显示,在单节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)中,i-FACTOR 组在术后 12 个月和 24 个月的复合终点(总体成功率)上优于自体骨移植。

目的

报告 FDA 批准后研究的最终 6 年临床和影像学结果。

方法

在参加 i-FACTOR 研究的 319 名受试者中,有 220 名参加了批准后研究(i-FACTOR 组 106 例,对照组 114 例)。

结果

研究在所有 4 个主要次要终点均达到了统计学上的非劣效性成功。在 i-FACTOR 组和自体骨移植组中,影像学融合率分别达到 99%(103/104)和 98.2%(109/111),i-FACTOR 组的颈痛残疾指数(NDI)从基线的改善值为 28.6(24.8,32.3),对照组为 29.2(25.6,32.9)(非劣效性 P<0.0001)。6 年时 i-FACTOR 组的神经功能成功率为 95.9%(70/73),对照组为 93.7%(70/75)(非劣效性 P<0.0001)。两组的安全性结果相似。在 i-FACTOR 组中有 20/106(18.9%)的患者和对照组中有 23/114(20.2%)的患者进行了同一或不同颈椎水平的二次手术(P=0.866)。i-FACTOR 组的次要手术结果(疼痛、SF-36 生理成分评分和心理成分评分)与自体骨移植组相似。

结论

i-FACTOR 满足了 FDA 规定的所有 4 项非劣效性成功标准,并在单节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗颈椎神经根病方面显示了安全性和有效性,术后 6 年仍可观察到。安全性结果是可以接受的,在 12 个月和 24 个月观察到的临床和功能结果在 72 个月时仍然存在。

相似文献

1
Six-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of i-FACTOR Peptide-Enhanced Bone Graft Versus Local Autograft in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.i-FACTOR 肽增强骨移植物与自体骨移植治疗单节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的随机对照试验 6 年随访结果
Neurosurgery. 2023 Apr 1;92(4):725-733. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002290. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
2
Efficacy of i-Factor Bone Graft versus Autograft in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results of the Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.i因子骨移植与自体骨移植在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中的疗效:前瞻性、随机、单盲的美国食品药品监督管理局研究器械豁免研究结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jul 1;41(13):1075-1083. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001466.
3
i-Factor™ Bone Graft vs Autograft in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: 2-Year Follow-up of the Randomized Single-Blinded Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.i-Factor™ 骨移植物与自体骨在颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中的比较:随机、单盲、食品和药物管理局研究性设备豁免研究的 2 年随访。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Sep 1;83(3):377-384. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx432.
4
Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months.Prestige LP椎间盘人工颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗双节段病变:一项24个月的前瞻性、多中心随机对照临床试验结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jun;26(6):653-667. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16264. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
5
Prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing M6-C compressible six degrees of freedom cervical disc with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical radiculopathy: 2-year results of an FDA investigational device exemption study.前瞻性、多中心临床试验比较 M6-C 可压缩六自由度颈椎间盘与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗单节段退行性颈椎病:FDA 研究性设备豁免研究的 2 年结果。
Spine J. 2021 Feb;21(2):239-252. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.10.014. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
6
Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.关于ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术与前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗单节段有症状颈椎间盘疾病的前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心食品药品监督管理局研究性器械豁免研究结果。
Spine J. 2009 Apr;9(4):275-86. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Sep 6.
7
Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.颈椎关节置换术与前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较结果:一项前瞻性、随机对照临床试验的四年临床结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Sep 21;93(18):1684-92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00476.
8
Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial.颈椎间盘置换与前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗双节段症状性退行性椎间盘疾病的五年临床结果:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心研究性器械豁免临床试验。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Aug;25(2):213-24. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.SPINE15824. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
9
Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial.颈椎间盘置换术临床试验中(FDA 调查设备豁免)及之外的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后再次手术的影响因素。
Spine J. 2012 May;12(5):372-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
10
Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study.采用PRESTIGE LP椎间盘的颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:一项前瞻性、多中心研究性器械豁免研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Nov;23(5):558-573. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.SPINE14589. Epub 2015 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming spinal surgery with innovations in biologics and additive manufacturing.通过生物制剂和增材制造方面的创新变革脊柱外科手术。
Mater Today Bio. 2025 May 13;32:101853. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101853. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.颈椎前路椎间盘切除术后骨融合的评估:一项系统文献综述和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Apr 25;48(1):386. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03542-w.
3
Biologic Therapies for Discogenic Pain.椎间盘源性疼痛的生物治疗
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Feb 11;29(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01325-4.
4
Clinical efficacy and safety of P-15 peptide enhanced bone graft substitute in surgical bone regenerative procedures in adult maxillofacial, spine, and trauma patients : a systematic literature review.P-15肽增强骨移植替代物在成人颌面、脊柱和创伤患者外科骨再生手术中的临床疗效与安全性:一项系统文献综述
Bone Joint Res. 2025 Feb 4;14(2):77-92. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.142.BJR-2024-0033.R2.
5
Bioactive peptides and proteins for tissue repair: microenvironment modulation, rational delivery, and clinical potential.用于组织修复的生物活性肽和蛋白质:微环境调节、合理递送及临床潜力。
Mil Med Res. 2024 Dec 5;11(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40779-024-00576-x.
6
The Association between High Preoperative MRI-based Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) Score and Titanium Mesh Cage Subsidence after Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion.术前基于 MRI 的椎体骨质量(VBQ)评分与前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术后钛网 cage 下沉的相关性研究。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Feb;16(2):303-311. doi: 10.1111/os.13931. Epub 2023 Nov 17.