Suppr超能文献

既往近视性小切口基质透镜切除术患者中使用和不使用全角膜曲率测量及光线追踪的人工晶状体屈光度计算公式的比较

Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas with and without total keratometry and ray tracing in patients with previous myopic SMILE.

作者信息

Meziane Elotmani Anouar, Messerschmidt-Roth Anke, Nehme Alexandra, Müller Hans-Helge, Sekundo Walter

机构信息

From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany (Elotmani, Messerschmidt-Roth, Nehme, Sekundo); Institute of Medical Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany (Müller).

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 May 1;49(5):467-473. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001139.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prediction error (PE) variance and absolute median PE of different intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas including last-generation formulas such as Barrett True-K with K, Okulix and total keratometry (TK)-based calculations with Haigis, and Barrett True-K in a simulation model in post-small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) eyes.

SETTINGS

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

METHODS

Preoperative measurements included IOL power calculation before and after SMILE surgery. The target refraction was set to be the lowest myopic refractive error in pre-SMILE eyes. The IOL power targeting at the lowest myopic refractive error in pre-SMILE eyes was selected for the post-SMILE IOL calculation of the same eye. The difference between the predicted refraction of pre- and post-SMILE eyes with the same IOL power was defined as IOL difference. The refractive change induced by SMILE was defined as the difference between preoperative and postoperative manifest refraction.

RESULTS

98 eyes from 49 patients underwent bilateral myopic SMILE. The PE variance of Okulix was not significantly different compared with Barrett True-K with TK ( P = .471). The SDs of the mean PEs were ±0.413 D (Haigis-TK), ±0.453 D (Okulix), ±0.471 D (Barrett True-K with TK), ±0.556 D (Haigis-L), and ±0.576 D (Barrett True-K with K). The mean absolute PE was 0.340 D, 0.353 D, 0.404 D, 0.511 D, and 0.715 D for Haigis-TK, Okulix, Barrett True-K with TK, Barrett True-K with K, and Haigis-L, respectively. The highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50 D was achieved by Okulix, followed by Haigis-TK, Barrett True-K with TK, Barrett True-K with K, and Haigis-L.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that Haigis in combination with TK, Okulix, and Barrett True-K with and without TK offer good options for accurate IOL power calculation after SMILE. Haigis-L showed a tendency for myopic shift in eyes after previous SMILE.

摘要

目的

在小切口透镜切除术(SMILE)术后眼的模拟模型中,评估不同人工晶状体(IOL)计算公式的预测误差(PE)方差和绝对中位数PE,包括诸如带K值的巴雷特True-K、奥库利克斯等最新一代公式,以及基于总角膜曲率计(TK)的海吉斯计算法和巴雷特True-K。

设置

德国马尔堡大学医院眼科。

设计

前瞻性研究。

方法

术前测量包括SMILE手术前后的IOL屈光度计算。目标屈光不正设定为SMILE术前眼中最低的近视屈光不正。选择以SMILE术前眼中最低近视屈光不正为目标的IOL屈光度用于同一只眼的SMILE术后IOL计算。相同IOL屈光度下SMILE术前和术后眼的预测屈光不正之差定义为IOL差异。SMILE引起的屈光变化定义为术前和术后显验光之间的差异。

结果

49例患者的98只眼接受了双侧近视SMILE手术。奥库利克斯的PE方差与带TK的巴雷特True-K相比无显著差异(P = 0.471)。平均PE的标准差分别为±0.413 D(海吉斯-TK)、±0.453 D(奥库利克斯)、±0.471 D(带TK的巴雷特True-K)、±0.556 D(海吉斯-L)和±0.576 D(带K值的巴雷特True-K)。海吉斯-TK、奥库利克斯、带TK的巴雷特True-K、带K值的巴雷特True-K和海吉斯-L的平均绝对PE分别为0.340 D、0.353 D、0.404 D、0.511 D和0.715 D。奥库利克斯在±0.50 D范围内的眼的百分比最高,其次是海吉斯-TK、带TK的巴雷特True-K、带K值的巴雷特True-K和海吉斯-L。

结论

结果表明,海吉斯与TK结合、奥库利克斯以及带或不带TK的巴雷特True-K为SMILE术后准确计算IOL屈光度提供了良好选择。海吉斯-L在既往SMILE术后眼中有近视性偏移的趋势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验