Suppr超能文献

[角膜屈光手术后白内障患者人工晶状体屈光度计算中总角膜曲率计与标准角膜曲率计的准确性比较]

[Accuracy comparison of total keratometry and standard keratometry in intraocular lens power calculations for post-corneal refractive surgery cataract patients].

作者信息

Wang X C, Su W J, Ge J J, Huang Y S

机构信息

Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao 266071, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 11;60(8):689-694. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20240301-00090.

Abstract

To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using total keratometry (TK) versus standard keratometry (K) in post-corneal refractive surgery cataract patients. This retrospective case series study included 30 patients (36 eyes) with a history of laser corneal refractive surgery who underwent cataract extraction and IOL implantation at Qingdao Eye Hospital, Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, from September 2022 to December 2023. The cohort comprised 16 males and 14 females, with an average age of (53.6±8.1) years. IOL power was calculated using the K-based Haigis-L and Barrett True-K formulas, as well as the TK-based Haigis and Barrett Universal Ⅱ formulas. Postoperative objective refraction was performed to obtain the actual refractive status of the operated eyes. The refractive prediction error (RPE) was defined as the difference between the actual spherical equivalent and the predicted refraction. The absolute value of the RPE was taken as the refractive absolute error (RAE). Differences in errors calculated by the four formulas were compared. TK showed good consistency with K, with TK being on average 0.50 D lower than K. Analysis of variance revealed statistically significant differences in RPE among the four formulas (<0.001). The RPE for the TK-based Haigis formula was (0.17±0.09) D, and for the Barrett Universal Ⅱ formula, it was (0.21±0.11) D, both significantly better than the K-based Haigis-L formula (-0.61±0.12) D and Barrett True-K formula (-0.57±0.11) D (all <0.001). The percentage of eyes with postoperative RPE<±1.00 D was higher for the TK-based Haigis (92%, 33 eyes) and Barrett Universal Ⅱ (86%, 31 eyes) formulas compared to the TK-based Barrett True-K (75%, 27 eyes) and Haigis-L formulas (67%, 24 eyes), with statistically significant differences (<0.05). Compared with K, TK improves the accuracy of IOL power calculation in post-corneal refractive surgery patients. Both the TK-based Barrett Universal Ⅱ and Haigis formulas demonstrate high accuracy.

摘要

比较角膜屈光手术后白内障患者使用总角膜曲率计(TK)与标准角膜曲率计(K)计算人工晶状体(IOL)度数的准确性。本回顾性病例系列研究纳入了30例(36只眼)有激光角膜屈光手术史的患者,这些患者于2022年9月至2023年12月在山东第一医科大学附属青岛眼科医院接受了白内障摘除及IOL植入术。该队列包括16名男性和14名女性,平均年龄为(53.6±8.1)岁。使用基于K的Haigis-L和Barrett True-K公式以及基于TK的Haigis和Barrett UniversalⅡ公式计算IOL度数。术后进行客观验光以获得手术眼的实际屈光状态。屈光预测误差(RPE)定义为实际等效球镜度与预测屈光之间的差值。RPE的绝对值作为屈光绝对误差(RAE)。比较了四个公式计算的误差差异。TK与K显示出良好的一致性,TK平均比K低0.50D。方差分析显示四个公式之间的RPE存在统计学显著差异(<0.001)。基于TK的Haigis公式的RPE为(0.17±0.09)D,Barrett UniversalⅡ公式的RPE为(0.21±0.11)D,两者均显著优于基于K的Haigis-L公式(-0.61±0.12)D和Barrett True-K公式(-0.57±0.11)D(均<0.001)。与基于TK的Barrett True-K(75%,27只眼)和Haigis-L公式(67%,24只眼)相比。基于TK的Haigis(92%,33只眼)和Barrett UniversalⅡ(86%,31只眼)公式术后RPE<±1.00D的眼的百分比更高,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。与K相比,TK提高了角膜屈光手术后患者IOL度数计算的准确性。基于TK的Barrett UniversalⅡ和Haigis公式均显示出较高的准确性。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验