Suppr超能文献

生态恢复能否缩小收入差距?对 290 个中国地级市的分析。

Could ecological restoration reduce income inequality? An analysis of 290 Chinese prefecture-level cities.

机构信息

Business School, Beijing Normal University, Haidian District, No. 19, Xinjiekouwai Street, Beijing, 100875, People's Republic of China.

School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Haidian District, No. 19, Xinjiekouwai Street, Beijing, 100875, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Ambio. 2023 Apr;52(4):802-812. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01815-y. Epub 2023 Jan 26.

Abstract

Ecosystem degradation and the serious wealth gap caused by rapid economic development have become problems that cannot be neglected during the progress of pursuing sustainable development and reducing income inequality in China. To determine whether ecological restoration such as vegetation cover could affect the income gap, we used data for 290 prefecture-level cities in China from 2007 to 2018 and analyzed the effect of ecological restoration on income inequality in China. In addition, we chose the year 2012 as a boundary and performed heterogeneity analysis to permit a detailed comparison of the variation in the effect over time. We found that ecological restoration can reduce income inequality in general, but this effect was not statistically significant until 2012. However, due to some practical obstacles (e.g., employment opportunities, educational attainment, social discrimination), reducing income inequality through ecological restoration will be a time consuming process and requires constant effort from the Chinese government and local managers such as funding green industries, providing more targeted technical training for the poor and social services for the rural migrant workers.

摘要

生态系统退化和经济快速发展导致的严重贫富差距,已成为中国在追求可持续发展和减少收入不平等进程中不可忽视的问题。为了确定植被覆盖等生态恢复是否会影响收入差距,我们使用了 2007 年至 2018 年中国 290 个地级市的数据,并分析了生态恢复对中国收入不平等的影响。此外,我们选择 2012 年作为一个界限,并进行了异质性分析,以便对随时间变化的效应进行详细比较。我们发现,生态恢复一般可以缩小收入差距,但直到 2012 年,这种效应才具有统计学意义。然而,由于一些实际障碍(例如就业机会、受教育程度、社会歧视),通过生态恢复来缩小收入差距将是一个耗时的过程,需要中国政府和地方管理者(如为绿色产业提供资金、为贫困人口提供更有针对性的技术培训以及为农村外出务工人员提供社会服务)不断努力。

相似文献

8
COVID-19 and Regional Income Inequality in China.新冠疫情与中国地区收入不平等
Front Public Health. 2021 May 11;9:687152. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.687152. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

3
Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis.环境收入与农村生计:全球比较分析
World Dev. 2014 Dec;64(Suppl 1):S12-S28. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
6
Protected areas reduced poverty in Costa Rica and Thailand.保护区减少了哥斯达黎加和泰国的贫困现象。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 1;107(22):9996-10001. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914177107. Epub 2010 May 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验